If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
New engine build
Hi Poeple
I am quite new to this group so please be kind ! I am planning on building my first engine. I have read loads on the net on how to ... performance this ... lightened fly wheel etc etc. A few times I have come across the statement " but dont do this if its going in a bus" ! So my question is this - what would be a good design, from carb though to exhaust for my new engine. I want not so much power/speed but tough reliable cruising at 70 - 80 MPH. Good MPG would be high on my list to. I have read that a "square engine" ( stroke equal to bore ) is good for fuel econ. Small inlet is good for busses ? Keep your flyweel heavy (180) etc. I will be using a spare 1300 dual port as my donar. Any good sites I might have missed ( for bus engines ). I would prefer type 1 as there doesnt seem to be that much info on type 4 ) Ta Rich 64 1600 split bus daily driver , 68 1300 bay bus, 78 2000 bay bus, 70 1200-70 1300 71 1300 and 72 1300 bugs. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
tricky wrote:
> Hi Poeple > > I am quite new to this group so please be kind ! > > I am planning on building my first engine. I have read loads on the net > on how to ... performance this ... lightened fly wheel etc etc. > > A few times I have come across the statement " but dont do this if its > going in a bus" ! > > So my question is this - what would be a good design, from carb though > to exhaust for my new engine. > > I want not so much power/speed but tough reliable cruising at 70 - 80 > MPH. Good MPG would be high on my list to. > > I have read that a "square engine" ( stroke equal to bore ) is good for > fuel econ. Small inlet is good for busses ? Keep your flyweel heavy > (180) etc. > > I will be using a spare 1300 dual port as my donar. > > Any good sites I might have missed ( for bus engines ). > I would prefer type 1 as there doesnt seem to be that much info on type 4 ) > > Ta > > Rich > > 64 1600 split bus daily driver , 68 1300 bay bus, 78 2000 bay bus, 70 > 1200-70 1300 71 1300 and 72 1300 bugs. > This is going in the '68 Bus ??? Type 1 engines: http://www.type2.com/rvanness/1600saga.htm http://www.geocities.com/Baja/Dunes/9702/engine.html Loads of Type 4 info: http://www.aircooledtech.com/ http://www.bostonengine.com/index.html http://www.dolphinsci.com/typeIV.html http://tunacan.net/t4/ How thick is your wallet?? Speedy Jim http://www.nls.net/mp/volks/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Speedy Jim wrote: > > This is going in the '68 Bus ??? Yes the 68 for now, but if its good I will do one for the 64 too. The 68 has a twin port beetle engine in that pulls better than the 1600 single port in the 64 ! > > Type 1 engines: > http://www.type2.com/rvanness/1600saga.htm > http://www.geocities.com/Baja/Dunes/9702/engine.html > > > Loads of Type 4 info: > http://www.aircooledtech.com/ > http://www.bostonengine.com/index.html > http://www.dolphinsci.com/typeIV.html > http://tunacan.net/t4/ > > How thick is your wallet?? Thats the other thing ! I dont want to spend to much ! Thanks for that - I will have a read. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
70-80 MPH in a 64 Bus? Hope you live where there is absolutely no wind!
"tricky" > wrote in message ... > > > Speedy Jim wrote: >> >> This is going in the '68 Bus ??? > > Yes the 68 for now, but if its good I will do one for the 64 too. > The 68 has a twin port beetle engine in that pulls better than the 1600 > single port in the 64 ! > >> >> Type 1 engines: >> http://www.type2.com/rvanness/1600saga.htm >> http://www.geocities.com/Baja/Dunes/9702/engine.html >> >> >> Loads of Type 4 info: >> http://www.aircooledtech.com/ >> http://www.bostonengine.com/index.html >> http://www.dolphinsci.com/typeIV.html >> http://tunacan.net/t4/ >> >> How thick is your wallet?? > > Thats the other thing ! I dont want to spend to much ! > > Thanks for that - I will have a read. > |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I used to drive my 2000 78 bay at these speeds easily. Has anyone out
there got a stock or mild built type 1 engine they are happy with ( or not! ) they would like to tell me about. I was thinking 1641 pistons and barrels, 1.4:1 rockers, but not sure wether to use a longer stroke crank. Some body must have a real life (ie not theory) view on the ideal engine for a bus !!! Wolfgang wrote: > 70-80 MPH in a 64 Bus? Hope you live where there is absolutely no wind! > > "tricky" > wrote in message > ... > >> >>Speedy Jim wrote: >> >>>This is going in the '68 Bus ??? >> >>Yes the 68 for now, but if its good I will do one for the 64 too. >>The 68 has a twin port beetle engine in that pulls better than the 1600 >>single port in the 64 ! >> >> >>>Type 1 engines: >>>http://www.type2.com/rvanness/1600saga.htm >>>http://www.geocities.com/Baja/Dunes/9702/engine.html >>> >>> >>>Loads of Type 4 info: >>>http://www.aircooledtech.com/ >>>http://www.bostonengine.com/index.html >>>http://www.dolphinsci.com/typeIV.html >>>http://tunacan.net/t4/ >>> >>>How thick is your wallet?? >> >>Thats the other thing ! I dont want to spend to much ! >> >>Thanks for that - I will have a read. >> > > > |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rotary Engine FAQ 0501 | Felix Miata | Driving | 0 | January 1st 05 12:27 PM |
1990 520i engine probs | Work Hard | BMW | 3 | October 28th 04 05:01 PM |
3.3L downshifting by self after replacing Engine | Bob Warmen | Chrysler | 8 | October 12th 04 05:39 PM |