A Cars forum. AutoBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AutoBanter forum » Auto newsgroups » Driving
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Common Cause - Just zis Website



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4  
Old May 27th 05, 04:17 AM
fbloogyudsr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

> Vincent Wilcox wrote:
>> I apologise in advance for the crosspost but would like the input of our
>> esteemed US counterparts in this discussion. I have of course included as
>> closely as I can match the same or similar two groups. It is basically a
>> question of Montana providing the hard evidence that is needed to drop
>> speed limits, below is my initial take on the situation and a repost to
>> the above, this is opinion and I look forward to views.


You don't state your opinion very well, your post is very disorganized
and incoherent. I'm guessing that you want lower speed limits and
want to find statistics that say that lower speed limits save lives. That
is demonstrably not the case, in terms of fatality *RATE*.

>> Montana had a reduction in fatalities from 1995 to 1996 of 11% the year
>> the speed limit was removed. It is noted that the fatalities in the later
>> part of the year are reduced[1], what time in 95 were the restrictions
>> removed?
>>
>> Why did Montana have a 31% increase in fatalities for the period
>> 1996/97[1]?


It was a blip. They immediately went back down the next year. See:
http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/finalr...Fatality_Rates

>> The question is this, is Montana representative of the rest of the world?


No. They are not even representative of the US. Note that the fatality
rate is different for MT than the majority of the US (see my reference.)
Since about 2000 they have had a 75mph limit, with very poor compliance
(I've driven there, and it's more like 85mph, as is Arizona, where the
fatality rate is in line with the US average.)

Please read in the report you posted: the rural (non-interstate)
roads have a very high fatality count and rate. Speeds on interstates
haven't affected the rate, and in fact it is now lower than in the period
before '97, in line with the rest of the US.

Speed limit compliance (especially on interstates - motorways for
you UK guys) in the US is not very good. The WA DOT publishes data
showing that:
http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/finalr...Fatality_Rates

Also, please note the section in the report you mention that talks
about *HOW* speed limits should be set (on page 5: FHWA). There
is no way to align your opinion with demonstrated facts from scientific
studies that support these guidelines.

Floyd

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New car website Terry Mitchell General 1 December 12th 04 07:19 AM
Please visit my brand new Xenon HID Showcase Website today... WENW Honda 0 October 11th 04 02:54 AM
Fix strategy for (common?) broken hood on '71? pgtr Corvette 22 October 9th 04 05:56 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AutoBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.