If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
FWIW Jeep Hi Pro Air Intake.
Just bought a hi performance air intake system for my '04 TJ six. I
figured I'd mention it because it's not K&N or one of those other aftermarket add ons. Made for Jeep labeled MoPar. My dealer says it won't affect my warranty! I keep track of my gas mileage so I'll be able to spot any improvement (or decrease). The slight power increase claimed is pretty subjective and I have no way to really test that. Got a "deal" on the instalation. I had it done in conjunction with my 21K service. No charge for the 21K service. Every little bit helps. :-) -- FRH |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
FWIW Jeep Hi Pro Air Intake.
Hmm, I put a Turbo City intake product, a cat-back exhaust system and some
other goodies on my four cylinder Wrangler some years ago. I definitely noticed an increase in gas mileage, and now is a time to go for that, unless you are rich. ( Earle "Frank_v7.0" > wrote in message ... > Just bought a hi performance air intake system for my '04 TJ six. I > figured I'd mention it because it's not K&N or one of those other > aftermarket add ons. Made for Jeep labeled MoPar. My dealer says it > won't affect my warranty! I keep track of my gas mileage so I'll be able > to spot any improvement (or decrease). The slight power increase claimed > is pretty subjective and I have no way to really test that. Got a "deal" > on the instalation. I had it done in conjunction with my 21K service. No > charge for the 21K service. Every little bit helps. :-) > -- > FRH -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
FWIW Jeep Hi Pro Air Intake.
Earle Horton wrote:
> Hmm, I put a Turbo City intake product, a cat-back exhaust system and some > other goodies on my four cylinder Wrangler some years ago. I definitely > noticed an increase in gas mileage, and now is a time to go for that, unless > you are rich. ( > > Earle > > "Frank_v7.0" > wrote in message > ... >> Just bought a hi performance air intake system for my '04 TJ six. I >> figured I'd mention it because it's not K&N or one of those other >> aftermarket add ons. Made for Jeep labeled MoPar. My dealer says it >> won't affect my warranty! I keep track of my gas mileage so I'll be able >> to spot any improvement (or decrease). The slight power increase claimed >> is pretty subjective and I have no way to really test that. Got a "deal" >> on the instalation. I had it done in conjunction with my 21K service. No >> charge for the 21K service. Every little bit helps. :-) >> -- >> FRH > > > Did it seem to be a little "stronger" as well as increasing the mileage? -- FRH |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
FWIW Jeep Hi Pro Air Intake.
"Frank_v7.0" > wrote in message
... > Earle Horton wrote: > > Hmm, I put a Turbo City intake product, a cat-back exhaust system and > > some other goodies on my four cylinder Wrangler some years ago. > > I definitely noticed an increase in gas mileage, and now is a time to > > go for that, unless you are rich. ( > > > > Earle > > > > "Frank_v7.0" > wrote in message > > ... > >> Just bought a hi performance air intake system for my '04 TJ six. I > >> figured I'd mention it because it's not K&N or one of those other > >> aftermarket add ons. Made for Jeep labeled MoPar. My dealer says it > >> won't affect my warranty! I keep track of my gas mileage so I'll be > >> able to spot any improvement (or decrease). The slight power > >> increase claimed is pretty subjective and I have no way to really > >> test that. Got a "deal" on the instalation. I had it done in conjunction > >> with my 21K service. No charge for the 21K service. Every little > >> bit helps. :-) > >> -- > >> FRH > > > > > > > Did it seem to be a little "stronger" as well as increasing the mileage? > Too close to call. The cat-back helped me keep track of when my daughter came home at night. The mileage increase was real and measurable. Maybe I felt a little "seat of the pants" power increase, maybe not. With the four cylinder, every horsepower helps. I wish I could tell you I was doing wheelies... Earle -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
FWIW Jeep Hi Pro Air Intake.
Earle Horton wrote:
> "Frank_v7.0" > wrote in message > ... >> Earle Horton wrote: >>> Hmm, I put a Turbo City intake product, a cat-back exhaust system and >>> some other goodies on my four cylinder Wrangler some years ago. >>> I definitely noticed an increase in gas mileage, and now is a time to >>> go for that, unless you are rich. ( >>> >>> Earle >>> >>> "Frank_v7.0" > wrote in message >>> ... >>>> Just bought a hi performance air intake system for my '04 TJ six. I >>>> figured I'd mention it because it's not K&N or one of those other >>>> aftermarket add ons. Made for Jeep labeled MoPar. My dealer says it >>>> won't affect my warranty! I keep track of my gas mileage so I'll be >>>> able to spot any improvement (or decrease). The slight power >>>> increase claimed is pretty subjective and I have no way to really >>>> test that. Got a "deal" on the instalation. I had it done in > conjunction >>>> with my 21K service. No charge for the 21K service. Every little >>>> bit helps. :-) >>>> -- >>>> FRH >>> >>> >> Did it seem to be a little "stronger" as well as increasing the mileage? >> > Too close to call. The cat-back helped me keep track of when my daughter > came home at night. The mileage increase was real and measurable. Maybe I > felt a little "seat of the pants" power increase, maybe not. With the four > cylinder, every horsepower helps. I wish I could tell you I was doing > wheelies... > > Earle > > > LMAO! -- FRH |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
FWIW Jeep Hi Pro Air Intake.
Frank_v7.0 wrote:
> Just bought a hi performance air intake system for my '04 TJ six. I > figured I'd mention it because it's not K&N or one of those other > aftermarket add ons. Made for Jeep labeled MoPar. My dealer says it > won't affect my warranty! I keep track of my gas mileage so I'll be able > to spot any improvement (or decrease). The slight power increase claimed > is pretty subjective and I have no way to really test that. Got a "deal" > on the instalation. I had it done in conjunction with my 21K service. No > charge for the 21K service. Every little bit helps. :-) FWIW the stock air plumbing is a well known to be less than ideal for power, this is true of almost ALL fuel injected vehicles intakes. The reason being they are required to meet NOISE regulations and fuel injection is NOISY stuff. so they are plumbed with more bends then needed to bounce the sound waves off of accoustically absorbant rubber, they are longer than needed to get more of the above. They are made out of less than ideal rubber tubing; which doesn't ressonate but which is prone to being sucked together thus constricting the flow; Into an "air box" which holds a filter but also provides a muffler like noise canceler, and a muffler like space for back pressure, into (finally) another bit of tubing often called a "snorkle" which is usually even softer rubber. This is why there's such a big industry around Cold Air induction, which throws that crap out in favor of less bends, metal pipes, and big air filters without a box or snorkle. -- Simon "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
FWIW Jeep Hi Pro Air Intake.
Simon Juncal wrote:
> Frank_v7.0 wrote: >> Just bought a hi performance air intake system for my '04 TJ six. I >> figured I'd mention it because it's not K&N or one of those other >> aftermarket add ons. Made for Jeep labeled MoPar. My dealer says it >> won't affect my warranty! I keep track of my gas mileage so I'll be >> able to spot any improvement (or decrease). The slight power increase >> claimed is pretty subjective and I have no way to really test that. >> Got a "deal" on the instalation. I had it done in conjunction with my >> 21K service. No charge for the 21K service. Every little bit helps. :-) > > FWIW the stock air plumbing is a well known to be less than ideal for > power, this is true of almost ALL fuel injected vehicles intakes. The > reason being they are required to meet NOISE regulations and fuel > injection is NOISY stuff. so they are plumbed with more bends then > needed to bounce the sound waves off of accoustically absorbant rubber, > they are longer than needed to get more of the above. They are made out > of less than ideal rubber tubing; which doesn't ressonate but which is > prone to being sucked together thus constricting the flow; Into an "air > box" which holds a filter but also provides a muffler like noise > canceler, and a muffler like space for back pressure, into (finally) > another bit of tubing often called a "snorkle" which is usually even > softer rubber. > > This is why there's such a big industry around Cold Air induction, which > throws that crap out in favor of less bends, metal pipes, and big air > filters without a box or snorkle. > You called that right. I was looking at the parts taken off and lo and behold snorkle, air box, etc. I don't detect any increased noise and a hill that was a downshift from 5th to 4th is now 5th only. Mileage will take a few more tanks to verify, but I know it didn't drop any. The installation even looks good. Aluminum tube with a big blue "MoPar" on it. Although "Jeep" would have been nice. :-) -- FRH |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
FWIW Jeep Hi Pro Air Intake.
"Simon Juncal" > wrote in message ... > > FWIW the stock air plumbing is a well known to be less than ideal for > power, this is true of almost ALL fuel injected vehicles intakes. The > reason being they are required to meet NOISE regulations and fuel > injection is NOISY stuff. so they are plumbed with more bends then needed > to bounce the sound waves off of accoustically absorbant rubber, they are > longer than needed to get more of the above. They are made out of less > than ideal rubber tubing; which doesn't ressonate but which is prone to > being sucked together thus constricting the flow; Into an "air box" which > holds a filter but also provides a muffler like noise canceler, and a > muffler like space for back pressure, into (finally) another bit of tubing > often called a "snorkle" which is usually even softer rubber. Funny, everything you mention isn't present on a TJ. The intake parts are hard plastic that doesn't deform under vacuum, with a bellows molded in the intake tube to keep engine vibs from transmitting to the body-mounted airbox. The TJ intake is just as long as it needs to be to reach the airbox, which is located in pretty much the only place it could be under the hood. The air box/intake trumpet is designed to acts as more a water-entry protection than a big muffler. > > This is why there's such a big industry around Cold Air induction, which > throws that crap out in favor of less bends, metal pipes, and big air > filters without a box or snorkle. > There's such a big industry because it looks cooler under the hood. If it really increased mileage/power, don't you think the OEM's would be all over it? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
FWIW Jeep Hi Pro Air Intake.
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> Funny, everything you mention isn't present on a TJ. The intake parts are > hard plastic that doesn't deform under vacuum, with a bellows molded in the I've no idea what you're on about... Is it your point that they don't use softer material because you looked under the hood of your TJ and found plastic instead of rubber? Maybe you're trying to prove my point for me? The intake hose on older 4.0's is made out of rubber, I know, I've got one sitting in my drive way. I'm sure they changed to harder plastic on your TJ because they wanted to optimize the HP and fuel economy every bit they could within the confines they have to work under (regulations and industry standards etc). > There's such a big industry because it looks cooler under the hood. Hmmm I guess your point is that they don't work and are only for looks... and that OEM's always optimize for power and never compromise for noise <shrug> I'm not going to try and part you from whatever notions who've got. There are a thousand dyno numbers, and auto industry noise regulations, floating about on the net if you wish to educate yourself. Your starting point should be inquiring as to why many manufacturers call the rubber tubing before an "air box" a "SILENCER" That should get you on the right track. > If it > really increased mileage/power > don't you think the OEM's would be all over > it? Great logic, so by your "reasoning" OEM's always produce and engineer all their components for optimal performance... So would you say a stock mustang GT comes with an optimal exhaust system, engineered with only performance and fuel economy in mind? Let's put it this way, would you trade me your plastic intake for the soft floppy rubber one off my 92 XJ? If the softer one was adequate then why did they change it? -- Simon "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
FWIW Jeep Hi Pro Air Intake.
Simon Juncal wrote:
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote: >> Funny, everything you mention isn't present on a TJ. The intake parts >> are hard plastic that doesn't deform under vacuum, with a bellows >> molded in the > > > I've no idea what you're on about... Is it your point that they don't > use softer material because you looked under the hood of your TJ and > found plastic instead of rubber? > > Maybe you're trying to prove my point for me? The intake hose on older > 4.0's is made out of rubber, I know, I've got one sitting in my drive > way. I'm sure they changed to harder plastic on your TJ because they > wanted to optimize the HP and fuel economy every bit they could within > the confines they have to work under (regulations and industry standards > etc). > >> There's such a big industry because it looks cooler under the hood. > > Hmmm I guess your point is that they don't work and are only for > looks... and that OEM's always optimize for power and never compromise > for noise <shrug> I'm not going to try and part you from whatever > notions who've got. There are a thousand dyno numbers, and auto industry > noise regulations, floating about on the net if you wish to educate > yourself. Your starting point should be inquiring as to why many > manufacturers call the rubber tubing before an "air box" a "SILENCER" > That should get you on the right track. > > > If it > > really increased mileage/power > > don't you think the OEM's would be all over > > it? > > Great logic, so by your "reasoning" OEM's always produce and engineer > all their components for optimal performance... So would you say a stock > mustang GT comes with an optimal exhaust system, engineered with only > performance and fuel economy in mind? > > Let's put it this way, would you trade me your plastic intake for the > soft floppy rubber one off my 92 XJ? If the softer one was adequate then > why did they change it? > Results on first tank: 254.4mi 10.950gal Wheels and tires 235/70x16 on 16x7 steel wheels. This is on an otherwise stock '04 Wrangler X. Mostly (90%) on paved roads running the a/c about half the time. I can live with it :-) -- FRH |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Jeep news from Chrysler | Scott in Baltimore | Jeep | 20 | June 28th 06 01:15 AM |
YJ Breaks down - Bad Triple AAA Experience. | Lou Boncek | Jeep | 9 | December 18th 05 10:55 PM |
Jeep Grand Cherokee 5.7 Hemi in UK | Dori A Schmetterling | Chrysler | 4 | June 2nd 05 10:22 PM |
intake or head gasket bad...need opinion... | scale | Technology | 4 | February 20th 05 10:02 PM |
What is a TJ? | Brian Foster | Jeep | 23 | January 22nd 05 06:06 AM |