If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Ignition question involving use of ballast resistor
HLS > wrote:
>"Scott Dorsey" > wrote in message ... > >> I am not really sure... I think you can look at the cable as a lumped-sum >> anyway. It's pretty much just the resistance of the cable that will >> affect >> how much the coil will ring on the tail end of the pulse, and I think that >> is the big deal. > >The inductance and the capacitance form the resonant circuit. The >resistance >is related to the Q, or quality factor. Yes, but the thing is that the coil inductance and the distributed inductance of the coil are so enormous that the cable doesn't contribute a whole lot. The cable impedance is pretty heavily swamped. Someone mentioned spiral-wound cables for RF suppression... I have never used such a thing, but they could have enough series inductance to change things. The most important part of that is that they will be a low pass filter. >The resonant circuit is responsible for the ringing. > >I believe, anyway>) It is, but the coil resonance itself is so substantial that the cable shouldn't change it TOO much. It would be fun to measure it with a scope, though, and see how changing the cable length alters the waveform. It bet it doesn't do much, but it would be fun to see. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Ignition question involving use of ballast resistor
jim wrote:
> > Jack wrote: > >>>> I checked the engine at idle in a dark area at >>>> night and saw no evidence of arcing. Could the high resistance wires be >>>> the cause? If so, what is the rationale? I can't think of one. > > My guess is the cause is in the primary not the secondary. But if it was due > to a leak in the secondary you would probably have to be looking at it in > the dark while it was happening. > Changing the spark plug wire resistance shouldn't have any effect. Current > doesn't really flow thru the wires until the spark plug starts to arc. The > tail end of the wave form will be affected but not the initial spike. > Getting rid of the resistance won't change the peak voltage in a measurable > way. > > It is not clear how this is going to help with your emissions. If the > mixture ia a bit rich all the spark in the world is going to get the extra > fuel to burn. If it is a tad lean it might help, but it doesn't sound like > that is the case. > > -jim I will find out soon what the emissions are. I just got back from a freeway run and some stop and go driving and the only problem was a sag when I floored it at about 25 to 35 mph, like the accelerator pump was out of adjustment or the power valve was not opening. I tweaked the pump linkage a bit but it wasn't out that much. I checked timing and it is at spec. Checking the power valve will involve tearing into the carb, which I will save for another day. It could be that the main jets are a tad too small, but before I do anything else I will take it to a smog shop for a dry run to see what the emissions are. At least the ignition system seems to be performing okay and that was my main worry. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Ignition question involving use of ballast resistor
On Dec 30, 6:56*pm, Jack > wrote:
> 1987 Dodge Dakota 3.9L carbed > > I recently posted on rec.autos.tech about the problems I was having with > an MSD 5900 Blaster ignition and an MSD 8202 Baster 2 coil. It seems I > could use one or the other with no problem, either the MSD ignition with 2 ppm HC is easy. Retard the timing 2 degrees and it will drop right down... Just to cover the bases... Is the Cat OK? a temp gun should show a hotter outlet than inlet. Does it run hot enough? No 160 TStat? Absolutely no misfires? A dollar bill held up to the exhaust should not vibrate. HTH, Ben |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Ignition question involving use of ballast resistor
ben91932 wrote:
> On Dec 30, 6:56 pm, Jack > wrote: >> 1987 Dodge Dakota 3.9L carbed >> >> I recently posted on rec.autos.tech about the problems I was having with >> an MSD 5900 Blaster ignition and an MSD 8202 Baster 2 coil. It seems I >> could use one or the other with no problem, either the MSD ignition with > > 2 ppm HC is easy. > Retard the timing 2 degrees and it will drop right down... > Just to cover the bases... > Is the Cat OK? a temp gun should show a hotter outlet than inlet. > Does it run hot enough? No 160 TStat? > Absolutely no misfires? A dollar bill held up to the exhaust should > not vibrate. > HTH, > Ben Thanks, Ben, I'll definitely keep that in mind when the time comes. 5 BTDC shouldn't look that much different from 7 BTDC. There has been an annoying misfire at idle for quite some time, although with the current ignition system that I described elsewhere on the thread, the idle seems to have smoothed out considerably. But the smog test I have to take doesn't cover idle. It covers 15 and 25 mph on a dynamometer. Sometime in the next week or two I am going to get a dry run at the smog shop to see what it's reading. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Ignition question involving use of ballast resistor
Scott Dorsey wrote:
> Jack > wrote: >>From this behavior I deduced that, for some reason, the problem was >> being caused by too much ignition voltage. To test out that theory I >> installed a 1 ohm ballast resistor in line with the +12 volts going to >> the coil. Voila, the problem vanished and I was back to strong, smooth >> acceleration from a dead stop. So then I tried a 1/2 ohm ballast >> resistor and the stumble returned, but not as bad, so I went back to the >> 1 ohm resistor. > > The ballast resistor does more than just change the voltage, it can change > the shape of the pulse through the coil as well. > >> Now we get to meat of the my puzzlement. The ignition wires that I have >> on the engine measure about 3000 ohms per foot. For about $45 I can buy >> some MSD Street Fire wires that are only 500 ohms per foot. I know a bit >> about electricity, but not enough to know whether or not these wires >> would enable me to run the MSD ignition and coil without the ballast >> resistor. After all, the point of an MSD ignition upgrade is to get >> longer stronger spark to the plug. > > No, using a wire with a lower resistance will _slightly_ increase the > voltage to the plug. But honestly, the difference is very small because > the voltage is so high and current so low that it takes a lot of resistance > to cause much drop. > >> I don't have a clue as to why the engine stumbles with both the MSD >> ignition and coil installed. From the symptoms it seems to me that it >> must be because of too much voltage at the coil tower, but why that >> might be causing the problem is beyond me. > > What you want is an ignition system analyzer that will let you look at the > signal coming out of the coil on a CRT. This will tell you what is really > happening when you put the ballast resistor in. Ask older shops around town > if they still have an analyzer kicking around. > >> Well that's it. At present, I am more than happy with the ballast >> resistors. The truck runs great. Just curious as hell as to what might >> be going on. > > The scope will tell you, and without the scope you have no real chance of > seeing what is happening. > --scott The modern equipment would be the Snap On Modis or the Snap On Vantage Pro. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Ignition question involving use of ballast resistor
On Jan 1, 12:33*am, Jack > wrote:
> ben91932 wrote: > > On Dec 30, 6:56 pm, Jack > wrote: > >> 1987 Dodge Dakota 3.9L carbed > > >> I recently posted on rec.autos.tech about the problems I was having with > >> an MSD 5900 Blaster ignition and an MSD 8202 Baster 2 coil. It seems I > >> could use one or the other with no problem, either the MSD ignition with > > > 2 ppm HC is easy. > > Retard the timing 2 degrees and it will drop right down... > > Just to cover the bases... > > Is the Cat OK? a temp gun should show a hotter outlet than inlet. > > Does it run hot enough? No 160 TStat? > > Absolutely no misfires? A dollar bill held up to the exhaust should > > not vibrate. > > HTH, > > Ben > > Thanks, Ben, I'll definitely keep that in mind when the time comes. > 5 BTDC shouldn't look that much different from 7 BTDC. > > There has been an annoying misfire at idle for quite some time, although > with the current ignition system that I described elsewhere on the > thread, the idle seems to have smoothed out considerably. But the smog > test I have to take doesn't cover idle. It covers 15 and 25 mph on a > dynamometer. Sometime in the next week or two I am going to get a dry > run at the smog shop to see what it's reading.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Jack, from readin gall the above posts, my GUESS is that the combination taht casues the stumble is for some reason casuing a WEAK spark. As one poster said, it is hardest to develop spark during acceleration when compression is the highest, so I guess there is some interaction in the electronics and the coil such that you have a poor spark at that time. Somehow the 1 Ohm ballast cures the interaction. I would leave the 1 Ohm in the circuit and be happy, but if you want to analyze this further I agree with another postr, you will need a scope or ignition analyzer to look at the SECONDARY waveforms and see just what is going on with and without the ballast. also as far as I know, the purpose of resistance plug wires is to reduce radio interference. They don't really lower or raise the voltage of the spark AT THE PLUG. You are doing a great job at narrowing in on this.. but I think you need a scope to get to the next step. Mark |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Ignition question involving use of ballast resistor
> > Well that's it. At present, I am more than happy with the ballast > resistors. The truck runs great. Just curious as hell as to what might > be going on. > > Jack Jack Read Dans' reply more closely. I would suspect that too much primary current just supersaturates the coil and it doesn't discharge properly, inhibiting the next charge/ discharge cycle. Dan Your post centered aound the ballast resistor selections. And Dans post says it all. Perhaps things would be improved by a RF coil or choke with a resistance of the same ohmage as the ballast resistor you have determined to work well. The secondary voltage is not really effected by the plug and or wire resistance. Perhaps by their construction. The signal at the plugs is really a complex Radio Frequency waveform that without a good scope can not be interpreted. The usual monitor scope found in the garage is not up to this. And finally the manufacturer of your ignition should probably not be in businees at all. They know little if anything about ignition systems. You vehicle manufacturer should be relied on. Contact their high performance folks for advice and guidance. Undoubly the manufacturer maximized the performance of your original ignition. Bob AZ |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Ignition question involving use of ballast resistor
Bob AZ wrote:
>> Well that's it. At present, I am more than happy with the ballast >> resistors. The truck runs great. Just curious as hell as to what might >> be going on. >> >> Jack > > Jack > > Read Dans' reply more closely. > > I would suspect that too much primary current just supersaturates the > coil and it doesn't discharge properly, inhibiting the next charge/ > discharge cycle. > > Dan > > Your post centered aound the ballast resistor selections. And Dans > post says it all. Perhaps things would be improved by a RF coil or > choke with a resistance of the same ohmage as the ballast resistor you > have determined to work well. > > The secondary voltage is not really effected by the plug and or wire > resistance. Perhaps by their construction. The signal at the plugs is > really a complex Radio Frequency waveform that without a good scope > can not be interpreted. The usual monitor scope found in the garage is > not up to this. > > And finally the manufacturer of your ignition should probably not be > in businees at all. They know little if anything about ignition > systems. You vehicle manufacturer should be relied on. Contact their > high performance folks for advice and guidance. The vehicle manufacturer, Chrysler, is the one that stuck me with an electronic feedback carburetor for which I cannot buy a replacement mixture control solenoid. Do you really think they would grace me with advice and guidance? Get real. > Undoubly the > manufacturer maximized the performance of your original ignition. > > Bob AZ > > |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Ignition question involving use of ballast resistor
> > The vehicle manufacturer, Chrysler, is the one that stuck me with an > electronic feedback carburetor for which I cannot buy a replacement > mixture control solenoid. > > Do you really think they would grace me with advice and guidance? > > Get real. > > > > > Undoubly the > > manufacturer maximized the performance of your original ignition. > > > Bob �AZ- Jack All things considered I do believe the manufacturer is a good source. I have contacted Chrysler myself and received good advice. And after a long evening conversation with a Ford Ignition Systems Engineer I am more aware of the choices that the manufactures make. Remember I advised to contact the manufacturers Performance folks. They have a periodic magazine that is available by subscription. I read all the issues at the dealer while getting my car and truck serviced. Chrysler, Ford and GM do make decisions as to whether parts ar available and for how long. I did own a 87 Chrysler 5th avenue for a number of years and I would expect to be able to locate whatever I would need for it. Might take some time but if the demand is there the parts are usually available. In another instance just this past year I needed a fan blade for a 64 Dodge PU and the Chrysler dealer bent over backwards to locate one for me. Took a few days but they called when they had the blade and there was no charge. Bob AZ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ignition question involving use of ballast resistor | Jack[_22_] | Technology | 54 | January 14th 09 03:15 PM |
(old) ignition question | George[_1_] | Technology | 27 | October 24th 06 04:23 AM |
ballast resistor wiring info needed | 66lark | Technology | 5 | April 10th 06 06:43 AM |
Would a bad ballast resistor cause an 86 F250 not to start? | [email protected] | Technology | 17 | December 30th 05 06:22 AM |
internal resistor in coil question | RB | Technology | 8 | December 27th 04 01:33 PM |