2-stroke diesel is the (near) future?

"Sport Pilot" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> HELLO! It's just the friggin usenet! Most of us don't even know who
> we are talking too. Some of us have more important things to do, such
> as correspondance on a 10 million dollor project. You bet that baby
> gets proofread, spell checked, grammer checked, proofread, maybe ask a
> co worker to proofread it, see what I missed, etc.

You want fry's with dat?

Rich S.

Don Stauffer wrote:
> Sport Pilot wrote:
> >
> > The Diesel is not an Otto cycle it is a completly differant cycle.
The
> > Diesel is a constant pressure cycle where the presure is constant
> > through the expansion phase.
> >
>
> I wouldn't say the ENTIRE expansion phase. That would not be that
great
> for efficiency- sort of like a steam engine running with no cutoff.
And
> if one injects fuel into the cylinder at the instant just before BDC,

> that fuel would be pretty much wasted. I was under the impression
that
> the cycle would look something like the steam (Rankine) cycle in that

> the way Diesel envisoned it it would be either constant enthalpy or
> constant pressure of part of the expansion phase, adiabatic during
the
> rest. The point where it changed would correspond to what would be
the
> throttle opening on a steam or SI engine. At full "throttle" the
> changeover would be late in stroke, light load early in stroke.

Where did I say the entire expansion phase? Where did I say there was
a perfect Diesel cycle?

Morgans wrote:
> "Sport Pilot" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
> > So what I often transpose letters. I don't spend time proofreading
> > something as trivial as a usenet messsage.
> >
> Yur lak of ettension tu detale makes ti seam lik yu dounut giv a dam.
Ti si
> knot heard too tack a secant adn pruff reed a poust.
> --
> Jim in NC

As long as I get 90% or so right, I really don't give a damn.

karel wrote:
> "ower" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "Morgans" > skrev i meddelandet
> > ...
> >>
> >> True, but _everyone_ can take the time to re-read their post, and
> >> everyone
> >> can learn basic rules, like their-there, to-too-two. By not doing
that,
> >> people that can't spell _do_ look like morons.
> >>
> >> They should run spell check if'in they know they have a speeling
problem,
> >> also.
> >> --
> >> Jim in NC
> >>
> > So I am a moron if my spelling isnt correct?
>
> I am afraid you did not take the full meaning of the msg.
> It was not said that people who can't spell errorfree are morons.
> Really not!
> What was said is that people who have difficulties with spelling
> (one such difficulty may be dyslexia) will _look like_ morons
> if they don't take the trouble to correct for their weakness.
>
> There's no blame in committing errors, who errs never?
> But we should be humble about them
> and hence try to avoid them
> In this case, by proofreading our msgs
> and correcting the errors we detect.
>
> Karel (closer to SE than to US)


Sooo, why did you get so upset a few posts back there? Like my
misspelling of diesel was sooo important?

wrote:
> On Fri, 13 May 2005 08:52:00 -0500, "MJC" > wrote:
>
> >
> >"Andrew P." > wrote in message
> link.net...
> >> Wandering aimlessly about the Web, I heard Sport Pilot say:
> >> > You have most of it right. Some things you have wrong,
> >> >
> >> > 1. Desiel injection timing is differant than on an Otto engine.
The
> >> > fuel is injected during the intake cycle on the Otto engine and
the
> >> > fuel is injected during the ignition cycle on the Desiel. On
the
> >> > Desiel the fuel injection cycle starts just before TDC and ends
well
> >> > after TDC. The fuel ignites as soon as it hits the hot air.
> >> >
> >> etc., etc. --- SNIP ---
> >>
> >> It's Diesel, not "Desiel".
> >>
> >> --
> >> Andrew P.
> >
> >Well if you're going to get picky, it's "Auto" engine, not "Otto"
engine.
> >
> >MJC
> >
> No, it is OTTO, named after the guy who invented the "otto cycle"
> engine - just like Diesel is named after the guy who invented the
> compression ignition or "diesel cycle" engine.

A compression ignition engine is not always a Diesel engine. Not sure
if Mr. Diesel invented comprssion ignition, but they used to be common
for model aircraft. Though called Diesel's modelers are often reminded
they are not really Diesel's.

"Sport Pilot" > wrote

> Some of us have more important things to do, such
> as correspondance on a 10 million dollor project.

Your attitude makes me wonder why you are in "only usenet." Nice of you to
come and play with us mortals.

Good luck. You will need it, an it won't be from me. Plonk
--
Jim in NC

In article .com>,
"Sport Pilot" > wrote:

> HELLO! It's just the friggin usenet! Most of us don't even know who
> we are talking too. Some of us have more important things to do, such
> as correspondance on a 10 million dollor project. You bet that baby
> gets proofread, spell checked, grammer checked, proofread, maybe ask a
> co worker to proofread it, see what I missed, etc.

Hello? You mean "to," (a preposition and therefore a word with which you
ought not end a sentence, anyway) "correspondence," "dollar," and
"grammar?" I'm not picking on you, particularly, but the pervasive
ignorance of spelling, grammar, punctuation, homonyms, sentence
construction, ad infinitum, makes me ****ing sick. And it isn't just
usenet, it's everywhere, even in your ten million dollar report, because
your computer can't fix everything and your coworkers are as apathetic
as you are. We're becoming a nation of ignorant idiots. I think that's a
bad thing, and a dangerous one. If we knew as little about airplanes as
we did the English language, and flew them as carelessly as we write,
we'd all be dead by now.

"Morgans" > skrev i meddelandet
...
> Good luck. You will need it, an it won't be from me. Plonk
>
About spellig, an it won't. An? And?
Have a nice day Owe from SE

actually, the model (glo-plug) engines are *NOT* Diesel, nor are they
compression ignition... they closely resemble hot-bulb ignition, since
the platinum wire in the glo-plug does remain red-hot during engine
operation...

Sport Pilot wrote:

>
>
> A compression ignition engine is not always a Diesel engine. Not sure
> if Mr. Diesel invented comprssion ignition, but they used to be common
> for model aircraft. Though called Diesel's modelers are often reminded
> they are not really Diesel's.
>

> Actually, it is Otto, as in 4-stroke spark ignition.

Dude, MJC was Joking