photoblocker spray works

Touchy, aren't we.

1) the photo radar is for 'speeding', not red lights.

2) why assume spam ? T1-S conversations aren't spam.....Martin

Martin Jackson wrote:
> Touchy, aren't we.

No. Just intolerant of BS.

> 1) the photo radar is for 'speeding', not red lights.

The spam mentions "around here in California".
Certainly in here Northern California, photographic traffic
enforcement is only common for red light enforcement and
not at all common for speed enforcement.

> 2) why assume spam ? T1-S conversations aren't spam.....Martin

Well this isn't a T1-S conversation, it's spam attempting to
sell a questionable product.

Dana

On 2005-03-11, Martin Jackson > wrote:

> 1) the photo radar is for 'speeding', not red lights.

Huh?

What's "photo radar"?

The scammer was claiming to avoid tickets issued based on being
photographed with a camera. The only times I've ever heard of
cameras used for issuing tickes it was for running red-lights
or toll-booths. I've never heard of cameras used for catching
speeders.

> 2) why assume spam ? T1-S conversations aren't spam.....Martin


--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! OVER the
at underpass! UNDER the
visi.com overpass! Around the FUTURE
and BEYOND REPAIR!!

Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2005-03-11, Martin Jackson > wrote:
>
>
>>1) the photo radar is for 'speeding', not red lights.
>
>
> Huh?
>
> What's "photo radar"?
>
> The scammer was claiming to avoid tickets issued based on being
> photographed with a camera. The only times I've ever heard of
> cameras used for issuing tickes it was for running red-lights
> or toll-booths. I've never heard of cameras used for catching
> speeders.

Photographic enforcement of speed is apparently common
in some parts of the world. Certainly not, however,
in California.

Dana

On 2005-03-11, Dana H. Myers > wrote:

>> What's "photo radar"?
>>
>> The scammer was claiming to avoid tickets issued based on
>> being photographed with a camera. The only times I've ever
>> heard of cameras used for issuing tickes it was for running
>> red-lights or toll-booths. I've never heard of cameras used
>> for catching speeders.
>
> Photographic enforcement of speed is apparently common in some
> parts of the world. Certainly not, however, in California.

After looking around a bit, I have found references to
photo/radar setups for speed enforcement in a couple provinces
in Canada, Washington DC, and Europe (Germany in particular).

In California photo setups seem to be only for red-light
violations.

--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! Look DEEP into the
at OPENINGS!! Do you see any
visi.com ELVES or EDSELS... or a
HIGHBALL??...

Grant Edwards > wrote:

>On 2005-03-11, Dana H. Myers > wrote:
>
>>> What's "photo radar"?
>>>
>>> The scammer was claiming to avoid tickets issued based on
>>> being photographed with a camera. The only times I've ever
>>> heard of cameras used for issuing tickes it was for running
>>> red-lights or toll-booths. I've never heard of cameras used
>>> for catching speeders.
>>
>> Photographic enforcement of speed is apparently common in some
>> parts of the world. Certainly not, however, in California.
>
>After looking around a bit, I have found references to
>photo/radar setups for speed enforcement in a couple provinces
>in Canada, Washington DC, and Europe (Germany in particular).

Yes, I remember them from Holland when I was even younger.

>In California photo setups seem to be only for red-light
>violations.

Anyway, you have to be major naive to believe the evidence
this "woman" (probably posted by the
kindergarten-dropout who runs phantasyplates.com) does *not*
present that the product does anything useful, (except for the
kindergarten dropout's bank account of course.)

Leon

--
Leon van Dommelen Bozo, the White 96 Sebring Miata .)
http://www.dommelen.net/miata
EXIT THE INTERSTATES (Jamie Jensen)

Dana H. Myers wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
> > On 2005-03-11, Martin Jackson > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>1) the photo radar is for 'speeding', not red lights.
> >
> >
> > Huh?
> >
> > What's "photo radar"?
> >
> > The scammer was claiming to avoid tickets issued based on being
> > photographed with a camera. The only times I've ever heard of
> > cameras used for issuing tickes it was for running red-lights
> > or toll-booths. I've never heard of cameras used for catching
> > speeders.
>
> Photographic enforcement of speed is apparently common
> in some parts of the world. Certainly not, however,
> in California.
>
> Dana

I think who you call the scammer makes a whole lot better sense than
any one of you panks who think that there is only a red light and not a
speed light camera. Do your homework and you will be surprised how
many of those that they have installed nationwide now.

uuglyjj wrote:

> I think who you call the scammer makes a whole lot better sense than
> any one of you panks who think that there is only a red light and not a
> speed light camera. Do your homework and you will be surprised how
> many of those that they have installed nationwide now.

Not in California, where I live. You live in California, too?

Dana

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:54:46 -0800, "Dana H. Myers"
> wrote:

>uuglyjj wrote:
>
>> I think who you call the scammer makes a whole lot better sense than
>> any one of you panks who think that there is only a red light and not a
>> speed light camera. Do your homework and you will be surprised how
>> many of those that they have installed nationwide now.
>
>Not in California, where I live. You live in California, too?
>
>Dana
Please see http://www.redlightcases.com/. Also, the Sept 02 issue of
Car and Driver has a good article on how such systems work.

Marcelo