If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Goodyear Wrangler AT/R Expedtion Report
First off - thanks to all those from these forums who answered my
calls for help from strange, faraway places, it's great to be part of a community! I'm now back in London, and I'd like to share this report with you - it may warn people off what I found to be a particularly disappointing tyre. Cheers, Peter ============================================ Camelworld Round-Africa Expedition Report Equipment/Tyres: Brand: Goodyear Wrangler AT/R Description: 235 X 70 R16 Tread: 2 x polyester cord, 2 x steel cord, 2 x nylon cord Sidewall: 2 x polyester cord Manufactured: South Africa Summary: I bought a set of six of the above tyres in Namibia after retiring the Michelin Synchrones, keeping three from the old set a emergency spares (a good move as it later turned out). The cost in local currency was about £100 per tyre. On the easier East African Roads the tyres fared well, and handled they handled the more rugged of the Lesotho passes with ease. My concern at an early stage was that the side walls of these tyres were prone to thorn punctures in terrain that I hadn't expected to challenge their integrity. As part of my planned strategy I saved two new tyres for the Ethiopian Roads North of Addis Abeba. By this time the vehicle was carrying it's lightest load of the expedition as I was travelling alone, and did not need to maintain fuel and water reserves, but even so the Wranglers were woefully inadequate for the road surface, which is sharp stone. In two days both rear tyres were replaced with the standby Michelins, and inspection revealed a total of nine tears along the centre-line of the tyres, where stones had simply pushed through the tread. The inside surface of the tyre seemed remarkably spongy for an all-terrain, and some of the tears were more than three centimetres long, although the softness of the tyre meant that they were able to seal themselves to an extent (i.e. they did not rapidly decompress, even with multiple holes). By contrast the Michelin Synchrones, which had seen between 10,000 and 35,000km of hard all-terrain driving, never caused any problems at all, despite not being classified as AT tyres. In Khartoum, Sudan I inspected the remaining Wranglers and discarded three of the original six, despite their total mileage being between 400km (the two new ones) and from the third 20,000km, of which more than half was on good asphalt. The remaining three Synchrones, by contrast, are still in good condition, and are road legal after taking me a further 20,000 km back to London. Post Expedition: I spoke to Peter Wayte of Goodyear (UK) who apologised for my poor experience with these tyres but would not consider compensating me for their poor performance, as I had discarded the damaged tyres. This is a shame as other suppliers have accepted the reality of this sort of travel and have taken my word for such failures. Peter stated that these tyres were designed to take into account the comfort of asphalt-road drivers who represented the majority of the, and therefore their off-road performance was bound to be compromised. I might read this as an admission that labelling the tyres as AT is a move motivated by their marketing department. Conclusion: I would not recommend these tyres of off-road use. The tyres are simply too soft to cope with stone penetration, and the sidewalls offer surprisingly little resistance to thorn brush. Mud performance was poor, but not unduly so for an AT tyre. Despite 6 ply tread construction compared to the Synchrone's 5 ply, these tyres significantly underperformed the Michelins. I suspect that they have been designed to appeal to the 4x4 driver who want a tyre that looks right, rather than to cope with genuine AT conditions. I will shortly be replacing these tyres with BFG Mud Terrains which were the original Camel Trophy specification tyres for the vehicle. Related Pages: http://www.camelworld.com/diary_ethiopia.htm http://www.camelworld.com/vehicle_tyres.htm |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you, the site was very informative and interesting. Great
pictures! Carl "Peter Strong" > wrote in message om... > First off - thanks to all those from these forums who answered my > calls for help from strange, faraway places, it's great to be part of > a community! > > I'm now back in London, and I'd like to share this report with you - > it may warn people off what I found to be a particularly disappointing > tyre. > > Cheers, > > Peter > > ============================================ > Camelworld Round-Africa Expedition Report > > Equipment/Tyres: > > Brand: Goodyear Wrangler AT/R > > Description: > 235 X 70 R16 > Tread: 2 x polyester cord, 2 x steel cord, 2 x nylon cord > Sidewall: 2 x polyester cord > Manufactured: South Africa > > Summary: > I bought a set of six of the above tyres in Namibia after retiring the > Michelin Synchrones, keeping three from the old set a emergency spares > (a good move as it later turned out). > > The cost in local currency was about £100 per tyre. > > On the easier East African Roads the tyres fared well, and handled > they handled the more rugged of the Lesotho passes with ease. My > concern at an early stage was that the side walls of these tyres were > prone to thorn punctures in terrain that I hadn't expected to > challenge their integrity. > > As part of my planned strategy I saved two new tyres for the Ethiopian > Roads North of Addis Abeba. By this time the vehicle was carrying it's > lightest load of the expedition as I was travelling alone, and did not > need to maintain fuel and water reserves, but even so the Wranglers > were woefully inadequate for the road surface, which is sharp stone. > In two days both rear tyres were replaced with the standby Michelins, > and inspection revealed a total of nine tears along the centre-line of > the tyres, where stones had simply pushed through the tread. The > inside surface of the tyre seemed remarkably spongy for an > all-terrain, and some of the tears were more than three centimetres > long, although the softness of the tyre meant that they were able to > seal themselves to an extent (i.e. they did not rapidly decompress, > even with multiple holes). > > By contrast the Michelin Synchrones, which had seen between 10,000 and > 35,000km of hard all-terrain driving, never caused any problems at > all, despite not being classified as AT tyres. > > In Khartoum, Sudan I inspected the remaining Wranglers and discarded > three of the original six, despite their total mileage being between > 400km (the two new ones) and from the third 20,000km, of which more > than half was on good asphalt. The remaining three Synchrones, by > contrast, are still in good condition, and are road legal after taking > me a further 20,000 km back to London. > > Post Expedition: > I spoke to Peter Wayte of Goodyear (UK) who apologised for my poor > experience with these tyres but would not consider compensating me for > their poor performance, as I had discarded the damaged tyres. This is > a shame as other suppliers have accepted the reality of this sort of > travel and have taken my word for such failures. Peter stated that > these tyres were designed to take into account the comfort of > asphalt-road drivers who represented the majority of the, and > therefore their off-road performance was bound to be compromised. I > might read this as an admission that labelling the tyres as AT is a > move motivated by their marketing department. > > Conclusion: > I would not recommend these tyres of off-road use. The tyres are > simply too soft to cope with stone penetration, and the sidewalls > offer surprisingly little resistance to thorn brush. Mud performance > was poor, but not unduly so for an AT tyre. Despite 6 ply tread > construction compared to the Synchrone's 5 ply, these tyres > significantly underperformed the Michelins. I suspect that they have > been designed to appeal to the 4x4 driver who want a tyre that looks > right, rather than to cope with genuine AT conditions. I will shortly > be replacing these tyres with BFG Mud Terrains which were the original > Camel Trophy specification tyres for the vehicle. > > Related Pages: > http://www.camelworld.com/diary_ethiopia.htm > http://www.camelworld.com/vehicle_tyres.htm |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
In article >, Peter
Strong > writes >First off - thanks to all those from these forums who answered my >calls for help from strange, faraway places, it's great to be part of >a community! Big snip. Interesting I have a customer in Nigeria who has just specifically ordered that tyre (in a different size). Infact they have ordered 80 of them. I am sure they will tell me if they are not up to scratch. The price you paid seems very steep considering they are of "local" manufacture. I know what I would be selling them for in the UK and after sending them back to Africa. They would be cheaper than that. -- Marc Draper Forsale Landrover Defender 90 300tdi county hardtop 1996 72K Landrover Discovery comercial 300tdi S reg 70k Landrover Discovery Comercial 300tdi R reg 62k Toyota Hilux surf 2.4 AW/AC/EW/SR Super winch X9 + genuine Landrover fitting kits for 200 Disco. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Goodyear Wrangler F1 | Mike Green | 4x4 | 0 | December 16th 03 04:38 AM |