1986 Pace For Sale

Hi everyone. I just reduced the price on my car from $13,900.00 to
$10,900.00 Do you people think I am too high? I am shocked at all the
lookers and no takers. Thanks.
http://usedcorvettesforsale.com/1986...tte-12641.html

Thats quite a drop in price you made ; could be the market is a bit
soft right now, although your Vette seems a good deal based on what it
has on it and its condition.

Thanks everyone. My car sold a couple of days ago. I let it go for
$10,000. Guy that bought it has never owned a Vette. I am certain he did
not appreciate what he is getting. He lives in the same town and I told him
to let me know of any questions he may have. I think he got a very good
deal.
Mike.

"ZombyWoof" > wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 20:01:39 GMT, "Mike Cenni" >
> wrote something wonderfully witty:
>
>> Do you people think I am too high?
>>
> I dunno. How much dope did ya smoke?
>
> All kidding aside, the market is a little soft right now. New car
> dealers are damn near giving away leftovers, cutting free interest
> deals for up to 72 months and ever DC is doing a "Try it for 30-Days"
> and if ya don't like it bring it back program. Kind of hard to
> compete against that.
>
> Retail ranges from $7,178 - $14,905 and you are about in the middle of
> that range so I guess you're going to have to wait.
>
> One of the big mistakes you made was pricing it to high in the first
> place. A lot of those original lookers might have bought at $11k, but
> passed at $14k. Of course just my opinion. Once I look at a used car
> and pass on it, I usually never go back for a second look just because
> the price has been dropped. If I couldn't work a deal first time
> around, doubtful I will the second time at bat.
> --
>
> Axiom #1:
> "The Usenet is not the real world. The Usenet usually does not even
> resemble the real world."
> Corollary #1:
> "Attempts to change the real world by altering the structure
> of the Usenet is an attempt to work sympathetic magic -- electronic
> voodoo."
> Corollary #2:
> "Arguing about the significance of newsgroup names and their
> relation to the way people really think is equivalent to arguing
> whether it is better to read tea leaves or chicken entrails to
> divine the future."
>
> 1987 - Gene Spafford