If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#291
|
|||
|
|||
Andy Turner wrote:
>>>>>>> Until next time eh, Mary - perhaps you'll be able to answer a >>>>>>> question properly then instead of evading. I doubt it though. >>>>>> >>>>>>I felt it was a perfectly decent response to the question. >>>>> >>>>> Well of course you would, since avoiding the question is what you >>>>> wanted to do <doh>! >>>> >>>>No, I don't think it is actually. >>> >>> So you were just inept then. >> >>No, I don't think I was actually. > > How do you explain it all then? Explain what? >>> Well done, Mary - uk.misc suits you down to the ground. >> >>Well, *I* like it here. > > That's good. You're amongst peers there. I do hope so. Some of them can walk and chew gum all at the same time. Sadly, not Pidge yet, but we're working on him. -- Happy, sad, cross and concentrating. |
Ads |
#292
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:37:32 GMT, Mary Pegg
> wrote: >Andy Turner wrote: > >>>>>>>> Until next time eh, Mary - perhaps you'll be able to answer a >>>>>>>> question properly then instead of evading. I doubt it though. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I felt it was a perfectly decent response to the question. >>>>>> >>>>>> Well of course you would, since avoiding the question is what you >>>>>> wanted to do <doh>! >>>>> >>>>>No, I don't think it is actually. >>>> >>>> So you were just inept then. >>> >>>No, I don't think I was actually. >> >> How do you explain it all then? > >Explain what? Exactly. I was right about inept. And anyone's supposed to take notice of any of your opinions on top posting when you act like a 12-year old troll? >>>> Well done, Mary - uk.misc suits you down to the ground. >>> >>>Well, *I* like it here. >> >> That's good. You're amongst peers there. > >I do hope so. Some of them can walk and chew gum all at the same time. >Sadly, not Pidge yet, but we're working on him. Enjoy Mike Corley too - you all deserve him. andyt |
#293
|
|||
|
|||
Andy Turner wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Until next time eh, Mary - perhaps you'll be able to answer a >>>>>>>>> question properly then instead of evading. I doubt it though. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I felt it was a perfectly decent response to the question. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well of course you would, since avoiding the question is what you >>>>>>> wanted to do <doh>! >>>>>> >>>>>>No, I don't think it is actually. >>>>> >>>>> So you were just inept then. >>>> >>>>No, I don't think I was actually. >>> >>> How do you explain it all then? >> >>Explain what? > > Exactly. I was right about inept. And anyone's supposed to take notice > of any of your opinions on top posting when you act like a 12-year old > troll? Avoiding the question, Andy? -- Happy, sad, cross and concentrating. |
#294
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 23:20:40 GMT, Mary Pegg
> wrote: >Andy Turner wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Until next time eh, Mary - perhaps you'll be able to answer a >>>>>>>>>> question properly then instead of evading. I doubt it though. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I felt it was a perfectly decent response to the question. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Well of course you would, since avoiding the question is what you >>>>>>>> wanted to do <doh>! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>No, I don't think it is actually. >>>>>> >>>>>> So you were just inept then. >>>>> >>>>>No, I don't think I was actually. >>>> >>>> How do you explain it all then? >>> >>>Explain what? >> >> Exactly. I was right about inept. And anyone's supposed to take notice >> of any of your opinions on top posting when you act like a 12-year old >> troll? > >Avoiding the question, Andy? Which question? andyt |
#295
|
|||
|
|||
Andy Turner wrote:
> Which question? What am I supposed to explain? -- Happy, sad, cross and concentrating. |
#296
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:17:32 GMT, Mary Pegg
> wrote: >Andy Turner wrote: > >> Which question? > >What am I supposed to explain? I already have. andyt |
#297
|
|||
|
|||
Andy Turner wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:17:32 GMT, Mary Pegg > > wrote: > >>Andy Turner wrote: >> >>> Which question? >> >>What am I supposed to explain? > > I already have. Have what? Anyway, you said something about "explain it all" and I just wanted some clarification of "it", because I know how much you like precision. -- Happy, sad, cross and concentrating. |
#298
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:59:38 GMT, Mary Pegg
> wrote: >Andy Turner wrote: > >> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:17:32 GMT, Mary Pegg >> > wrote: >> >>>Andy Turner wrote: >>> >>>> Which question? >>> >>>What am I supposed to explain? >> >> I already have. > >Have what? I don't know, you tell me! Anyway, what are trying to explain? Spit it out fella! >Anyway, you said something about "explain it all" and I just >wanted some clarification of "it", because I know how much you >like precision. Maybe I *did* want you to explain it *all*. Start from the top. andyt |
#299
|
|||
|
|||
Andy Turner wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:59:38 GMT, Mary Pegg > > wrote: > >>Andy Turner wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:17:32 GMT, Mary Pegg >>> > wrote: >>> >>>>Andy Turner wrote: >>>> >>>>> Which question? >>>> >>>>What am I supposed to explain? >>> >>> I already have. >> >>Have what? > > I don't know, you tell me! How am *I* supposed to know what you meant? > Anyway, what are trying to explain? Spit it > out fella! That's what I'm asking! >>Anyway, you said something about "explain it all" and I just >>wanted some clarification of "it", because I know how much you >>like precision. > > Maybe I *did* want you to explain it *all*. Start from the top. Is electrons a good place to start? Perhaps we can skip that bit and move on to NNTP? RFC 1036? -- Happy, sad, cross and concentrating. |
#300
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:39:03 GMT, Mary Pegg
> wrote: >Andy Turner wrote: > >> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:59:38 GMT, Mary Pegg >> > wrote: >> >>>Andy Turner wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:17:32 GMT, Mary Pegg >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>>Andy Turner wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Which question? >>>>> >>>>>What am I supposed to explain? >>>> >>>> I already have. >>> >>>Have what? >> >> I don't know, you tell me! > >How am *I* supposed to know what you meant? Perhaps you should try a metaphor? >> Anyway, what are trying to explain? Spit it >> out fella! > >That's what I'm asking! I've no idea what you think you're trying to explain. Why don't you try explaining that metaphor. Or perhaps why you call yourself Mary. >>>Anyway, you said something about "explain it all" and I just >>>wanted some clarification of "it", because I know how much you >>>like precision. >> >> Maybe I *did* want you to explain it *all*. Start from the top. > >Is electrons a good place to start? Perhaps we can skip that bit >and move on to NNTP? RFC 1036? Big bang I think is the place, unless you're of a religious persuasion. T-0 I think they call it. andyt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WANT TO BUT A SPYDER......? | Bagger | Chrysler | 0 | January 13th 05 06:22 PM |