If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
New Mustang Cobra rear suspension
Anyone know if the new Mustang Cobra will have a solid or independent rear
axle? If it ever comes out Al |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
supposedly it will be solid
no irs "Big Al" > wrote in message ... > Anyone know if the new Mustang Cobra will have a solid or independent rear > axle? If it ever comes out > > Al > > |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:51:33 -0700, "Big Al" >
wrote: >Anyone know if the new Mustang Cobra will have a solid or independent rear >axle? If it ever comes out > >Al > **** ford uses CHEAP suspension in all their products cheap tooooooo u cant even get 30k on balljoints in a f450 fords idea: sell the same part in all cars make them so they dont last btw if you seen what other auto manufactures use ford has blown it they are miles behind in this area hurc ast |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Big Al wrote:
> Anyone know if the new Mustang Cobra will have a solid or independent rear > axle? If it ever comes out Al, It's going to be a solid axle. According to Ford, most Mustang enthusiasts like to drag race and there's nothing better than a solid axle for that. Plus, Ford says a solid axle helps keep the price down by a couple grand. Personally, I like both reasons. Patrick '93 Cobra |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Brent P wrote:
> In article . com>, wrote: > >>Big Al wrote: >> >>>Anyone know if the new Mustang Cobra will have a solid or independent >> >>rear >> >>>axle? If it ever comes out >> >>Al, >> >>It's going to be a solid axle. According to Ford, most Mustang >>enthusiasts like to drag race and there's nothing better than a solid >>axle for that. Plus, Ford says a solid axle helps keep the price down >>by a couple grand. >> >>Personally, I like both reasons. > > > It's just ford bull****. They can put an IRS in a simple base level family > sedan in austrailia. Ford can also build one that can hold up to drag > racing just fine. They simply choose not to do so with the mustang > because most buyers in the USA won't notice. Then they can pocket the > money they don't spend on development. And I doubt it keeps the price > down to us any. The price is what they think the market will bare and > not a penny less. > > The top mustang here in the USA doesn't even get the same consideration as a > grocery getter in another country. In the USA it's all about marketing > and getting away with cheapening the product in any way they can. That grocery getter isn't sporting a 5.4L, DOHC, four valve head, fordged rotating assembly engine topped with a twin screw blower either. Nothing is perfect but, IMHO, the GT500 is damn close. In the real world I bet the difference in performance between the new solid axle design and an IRS setup is minimal at best. > Will I put up with this? If it's the only definency, the price is really > $40K, they really do build it to demand so I can just order one, there > are aftermarket corrective actions I can install myself, and I haven't > said 'the hell with it' and bought something else by the time it > comes out. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
In article >, Michael Johnson, PE wrote:
> Brent P wrote: >> It's just ford bull****. They can put an IRS in a simple base level family >> sedan in austrailia. Ford can also build one that can hold up to drag >> racing just fine. They simply choose not to do so with the mustang >> because most buyers in the USA won't notice. Then they can pocket the >> money they don't spend on development. And I doubt it keeps the price >> down to us any. The price is what they think the market will bare and >> not a penny less. >> >> The top mustang here in the USA doesn't even get the same consideration as a >> grocery getter in another country. In the USA it's all about marketing >> and getting away with cheapening the product in any way they can. > > That grocery getter isn't sporting a 5.4L, DOHC, four valve head, > fordged rotating assembly engine topped with a twin screw blower either. > Nothing is perfect but, IMHO, the GT500 is damn close. In the real > world I bet the difference in performance between the new solid axle > design and an IRS setup is minimal at best. So you are going to tell me ford engineers are morons? Come on. They can do it. In fact, that 'grocery getter' has high performance models as well. http://www.fpv.com.au/ 388hp from the boss 290 V8... If ford engineers can't make a proper IRS, then I doubt their ability to design the rest of the car. That's what makes it a matter of marketeer and bean-counter will, not one of 'too much horsepower'. Because if they can't do an IRS, they couldn't do the engine or transmission either. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2007 Shelby GT500 Mustang | Dan | Ford Mustang | 30 | March 25th 05 12:35 AM |
FORD TO INCREASE MUSTANG PRODUCTION TO MEET RUNAWAY CONSUMER DEMAND | Grover C. McCoury III | Ford Mustang | 1 | March 23rd 05 11:08 PM |
21st Century Goat vs Mustang Shootout | [email protected] | Ford Mustang | 1 | January 15th 05 06:09 PM |
NEWSFLASH!! John Coletti, SVT Head, "Retires" | [email protected] | Ford Mustang | 1 | December 13th 04 05:48 PM |
New *FREE* Corvette Discussion Forum | JLA ENTERPRISES TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATION | Corvette | 12 | November 30th 04 06:36 PM |