134a Refrigerant

"Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message =
...
> "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message=20
> .. .
> > Look, Stonewall, I'm not going anywhere
>=20
> just as well, i needed a play-toy. :-)

Look, Stonewall, I'm not going anywhere, so you
can just get used to me.

So how about that NOAA stuff? Pretty conclusive,
eh?
__
Steve
..

"L.W. (=DFill) Hughes III" > wrote in message =
...
> Same here.=20

'mee, too... bye!'
__
Steve
..

"L.W. (=DFill) Hughes III" > wrote in message =
...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >=20
> > Water is easily taken apart with electricity... and
> > burning something with hydrogen in it (like your
> > car's gasoline) creates what you could term 'new
> > water'. However, the quote I gave is referring to
> > how long the water has been in the ground.
> >=20
> > Perhaps you're thinking of 'atoms'... the same
> > hydrogen and oxygen atoms are still running
> > around, just in different configurations. New
> > atoms are normally made from bigger, radioactive
> > ones, by decay. Fusion makes bigger atoms from
> > smaller ones... happens in the Sun, in hydrogen
> > bombs, and now (recently!) on a small scale in
> > the laboratory.

> There is nothing new under the sun.=20

Still a flat-earther? We can learn...=20
__
Steve
..

"L.W. (=DFill) Hughes III" > wrote in message =
...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >=20
> > Bill, those liberal search engines will just get you
> > into trouble! Take a guess what salt is made from...
> > the whole point is, Freon can carry chlorine up high,
> > where only a *big* volcano can normally put it.

EPA, Bill..... eeeeeeeppppppaaaaaa..... nniiiiiixxxxooonnnn.
__
Steve
..

"Jeff Olsen" > wrote in message
...
> OK... straw poll... Bill= informative, appreciated, and energetic, but for
> sure right wing zealot. Steve= doing an OK job of holding down the
> left-wing (not that there is one) fort: providing links, argueing nicely,
> calling spades spades.
>
> Advantage: Steve. The right is drunk with power right now and spouting
> nonsensical lines fed to them by Rush et al.


Drunk with power? Hardly. It's just Bill being nonsensical because he is so
fed up. Life and the universe has Order, liberals would upset the Order if
given free rein, and this is just as nonsensical to Bill as Bill is to you.

If asked to lean left or right, I'm definately a leaner to the right, so I
am firmly in Bill's camp on most of the issues, even if I think Bill is
overboard. At least he's overboard in the right direction. Frankly, I could
get along with anybody, no matter which side of the boat they are on, but
when they go overboard, I'm more sympathetic to those that go over from my
side than from the other side.

Example. Howard Dean. This guy is doing more for my party than anybody the
Dems have trotted out in a very long time. He is helping us more than Ted
Kennedy, so it should be no wonder that I am not standing at the railing
tossing the life preservers off the side.





Pretty lame. The left is
> cowering and shell-shocked and stunned that the SOB got re-elected but is
> starting to prove that they are demonstratably correct on issues of the
> enviroment and Iraq, not that reality seems to matter to conservatives.
> Nonetheless, the truth is the truth.
>
> The left has no balls.

No balls? They have muy grande juevos my friend, putting Howard Dean in
charge. This is not the act of a party with no balls.

"Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message
. ..
> Look, Stonewall, I'm not going anywhere

look liberal, i dont want you to go anywhere. i like having a sock puppet.
:-)

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

"Jeff Strickland" > wrote in message
...
> Example. Howard Dean. This guy is doing more for my party than anybody the
> Dems have trotted out in a very long time.

lol aint it the truth!

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

"Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message =
...
> "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message=20
> . ..
> > Look, Stonewall, I'm not going anywhere
>=20
> look liberal, i dont want you to go anywhere. i like having a sock =
puppet.=20
> :-)

That's funny! What else don't you know
about the web?
__
Steve
..

"Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message
. ..
> That's funny! What else don't you know about the web?

depends. what would you like to know?

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

"Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message =
...
> "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message=20
> . ..
> > That's funny! What else don't you know about the web?
>=20
> depends. what would you like to know?

Well, let's start with the definition of 'sock puppet'...
__
Steve
..