Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________==___ utivro

> Take into consideration the efforts of Clinton to decrease
> funding for intelligence-gathering agencies. Also, consider the
> efforts by Jamie Gorelick (who was also on the 9/11 Commission)
> who mandated that the FBI and CIA could not, legally, share
> information. I don't think it's reasonable to expect Bush to
> get US intelligence back on its feet in the few months he was
> in office before 9/11.
>
Nice call again Brian. You're right, 9/11 occurred because of
Clinton not Bush. Clinton spent his eight years wiping out
our intelligence gathering ability. After all, the cold war was over,
what was there to be afraid of?
>>>Mike

"K5" > wrote in message
...
> "Brian Talley" > wrote in message
> .. .
> > The military is presently kicking the bejesus out of terrorists in
> Falujah.
> In other good news today, arafat is dead again, oil is down to $48 a
barrel,
> democrats still on suicide watch.
>
>

Those may all be inter-related!

On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 23:45:10 GMT, "Mike64Bug" <mfkoch
> wrote:

>> Take into consideration the efforts of Clinton to decrease
>> funding for intelligence-gathering agencies. Also, consider the
>> efforts by Jamie Gorelick (who was also on the 9/11 Commission)
>> who mandated that the FBI and CIA could not, legally, share
>> information. I don't think it's reasonable to expect Bush to
>> get US intelligence back on its feet in the few months he was
>> in office before 9/11.
>>
>Nice call again Brian. You're right, 9/11 occurred because of
>Clinton not Bush. Clinton spent his eight years wiping out
>our intelligence gathering ability. After all, the cold war was over,
>what was there to be afraid of?
>>>>Mike
>
Nah, 9/11 happened because a bunch of sand ******s don't like America
and decided to fly planes into buildings. Trying to blame it on past
and present presidents is a misappropriation of blame. Blame it on the
****ty kook religion the terrorists believe in and *their* leaders who
actively encourage that behavior.

Wrong! Yusef,
There were plenty of ties found between Hussein, Al Quaeda, and Bin Laden.
There were no ties found which coupled Hussein to 9/11.
"David Gravereaux" > wrote in message
...
> Brian Talley > wrote:
>
>>3) We know Hussein hated the U.S., that he had ties with terrorists
>>in general and al Qaeda in particular.
>>
>>Do the math.
>
> Untrue. No ties to Bin Ladden were found.
>
> All in all the specifics for WMDs that Bush told the public were false.
> He has yet to make good on those mistakes.
> --
> David Gravereaux >
> [species: human; planet: earth,milkyway(western spiral arm),alpha sector]

Wrong DAWg! There were no substantive ties between Saddam Hussein and Bin
Laden or Al Qaeda--other than a fatwa declared by Bin Laden to overthrow
Saddam because he was too secular. It's hard to work with someone who has
worked for your downfall. Prior to that Bin Laden once tried to arrange a
partnership, but he was ignored. That's it. That's all the "ties"--they are
lies--just like the WMD.

--
Prophetic Words: "On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land
will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned
by a downright moron." - H.L. Mencken


"DAW" > wrote in message
...
> Wrong! Yusef,
> There were plenty of ties found between Hussein, Al Quaeda, and Bin Laden.
> There were no ties found which coupled Hussein to 9/11.
> "David Gravereaux" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Brian Talley > wrote:
>>
>>>3) We know Hussein hated the U.S., that he had ties with terrorists
>>>in general and al Qaeda in particular.
>>>
>>>Do the math.
>>
>> Untrue. No ties to Bin Ladden were found.
>>
>> All in all the specifics for WMDs that Bush told the public were false.
>> He has yet to make good on those mistakes.
>> --
>> David Gravereaux >
>> [species: human; planet: earth,milkyway(western spiral arm),alpha sector]
>
>