If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
'04 ZJ opinions/experience
Thinking about a low mileage(21K) 2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.0
Selectrac. Has DC fixed many of the problems common to late '90s ZJs I.e. leaks, axle problems, trans problems, or have there been new ones? I did notice different trans cooler line fittings, an external fuel filter(fuel pump??), and larger front brake calibers. The old 4 link rear suspension with track bar has been replaced by a triangular upper link attached to the top of the differential - is this an improvement or just a way to lower cost? Have there been any major recalls on these? An '03 would also be an option, were they better or worse than the '04's? Thanx |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
'04 ZJ opinions/experience
The nomenclature for an 2004 Grand Cherokee is WJ. And as far as I
know none have any problems. None are off road capable, so I would pass this "triangular" control arm modification. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O http://www.billhughes.com/ Al J wrote: > > Thinking about a low mileage(21K) 2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.0 > Selectrac. Has DC fixed many of the problems common to late '90s ZJs > I.e. leaks, axle problems, trans problems, or have there been new ones? > I did notice different trans cooler line fittings, an external fuel > filter(fuel pump??), and larger front brake calibers. The old 4 link > rear suspension with track bar has been replaced by a triangular upper > link attached to the top of the differential - is this an improvement or > just a way to lower cost? Have there been any major recalls on these? An > '03 would also be an option, were they better or worse than the '04's? > > Thanx |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
'04 ZJ opinions/experience
WJs off-road
http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2105516192 "L.W.(Bill) Hughes III" > wrote in message ... > The nomenclature for an 2004 Grand Cherokee is WJ. And as far as I > know none have any problems. > None are off road capable, so I would pass this "triangular" > control arm modification. > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > http://www.billhughes.com/ > > Al J wrote: >> >> Thinking about a low mileage(21K) 2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.0 >> Selectrac. Has DC fixed many of the problems common to late '90s ZJs >> I.e. leaks, axle problems, trans problems, or have there been new ones? >> I did notice different trans cooler line fittings, an external fuel >> filter(fuel pump??), and larger front brake calibers. The old 4 link >> rear suspension with track bar has been replaced by a triangular upper >> link attached to the top of the differential - is this an improvement or >> just a way to lower cost? Have there been any major recalls on these? An >> '03 would also be an option, were they better or worse than the '04's? >> >> Thanx |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
'04 ZJ opinions/experience
I could have backed off a rock and staged my '89 Thunderbird to
look more capable. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O http://www.billhughes.com/ billy ray wrote: > > WJs off-road > > http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2105516192 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
'04 ZJ opinions/experience
"Al J" > wrote in message ... > > The revised rear upper control arm setup made me wonder if it was the > fix for all the problems with rear axle carrier bearings, since this > would seem to take some of the loading off the axle tube to differential > case. The new Liberty's have a similar setup, which made me wonder if DC > was just sharing parts to save $$$ ;-) Weight load is still on the axle tubes, the links only serve to locate the axles, the load is taken by the springs. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rust ate my dash (need opinions/experience) | brianc | Jeep | 2 | October 16th 05 08:09 PM |