If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
> wrote in message ... > Since large vehicles are safer for the occupants, would > it not make more sense to get rid of the more dangerous smaller > cars? > > > mike hunt > Of course not. Fewer people = less pollution. - |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
> wrote in message ... > Since large vehicles are safer for the occupants, would > it not make more sense to get rid of the more dangerous smaller > cars? > > > mike hunt > Of course not. Fewer people = less pollution. - |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
George Conklin wrote: > > wrote in message > ... > > Since large vehicles are safer for the occupants, would > > it not make more sense to get rid of the more dangerous smaller > > cars? > > > > > > mike hunt > > > Of course not. Fewer people = less pollution. - Do you think a Dutch riding a bicycle does the same damage as a mental midget driving a 10MPG SUV? It's not fewer people, but fewer of the wrong kind of people. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
George Conklin wrote: > > wrote in message > ... > > Since large vehicles are safer for the occupants, would > > it not make more sense to get rid of the more dangerous smaller > > cars? > > > > > > mike hunt > > > Of course not. Fewer people = less pollution. - Do you think a Dutch riding a bicycle does the same damage as a mental midget driving a 10MPG SUV? It's not fewer people, but fewer of the wrong kind of people. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
"DonQuixote-v-Windmills" > wrote in message oups.com... > > wrote: > > Since large vehicles are safer for the occupants, would > > it not make more sense to get rid of the more dangerous smaller > > cars? > > OK, then we need government-subsidized SUVs for all. Even the poor > ought to have one! > They do. Older ones. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
"DonQuixote-v-Windmills" > wrote in message oups.com... > > wrote: > > Since large vehicles are safer for the occupants, would > > it not make more sense to get rid of the more dangerous smaller > > cars? > > OK, then we need government-subsidized SUVs for all. Even the poor > ought to have one! > They do. Older ones. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
"DonQuixote-v-Windmills" > wrote in message oups.com... > > George Conklin wrote: > > > wrote in message > > ... > > > Since large vehicles are safer for the occupants, would > > > it not make more sense to get rid of the more dangerous smaller > > > cars? > > > > > > > > > mike hunt > > > > > Of course not. Fewer people = less pollution. - > > Do you think a Dutch riding a bicycle does the same damage as a mental > midget driving a 10MPG SUV? It's not fewer people, but fewer of the > wrong kind of people. > Here we go again: bicycle riders are morally superior. I guess when all else fails, you just claim moral superiority. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
"DonQuixote-v-Windmills" > wrote in message oups.com... > > George Conklin wrote: > > > wrote in message > > ... > > > Since large vehicles are safer for the occupants, would > > > it not make more sense to get rid of the more dangerous smaller > > > cars? > > > > > > > > > mike hunt > > > > > Of course not. Fewer people = less pollution. - > > Do you think a Dutch riding a bicycle does the same damage as a mental > midget driving a 10MPG SUV? It's not fewer people, but fewer of the > wrong kind of people. > Here we go again: bicycle riders are morally superior. I guess when all else fails, you just claim moral superiority. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Only in your small mind is that an option.
mike hunt DonQuixote-v-Windmills wrote: > > wrote: > > Since large vehicles are safer for the occupants, would > > it not make more sense to get rid of the more dangerous smaller > > cars? > > OK, then we need government-subsidized SUVs for all. Even the poor > ought to have one! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|