The Justic system, the courts

Motorhead Lawyer wrote:
> wrote:
> > Motorhead Lawyer wrote:
> > > wrote:
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Who here thinks our Justic system is fair and "just"?
> > > >
> > > > Looks like everyone is 100% satisfied with the system than.
> Either
> > > > that or they are just too ignorant of the fact to actually have
> > > > anything intelligent to say.
> > >
> > > Option Number Three: Don't Feed Trolls.
> >
> >
> > You just shot yourself in the leg with that remark. Just because
> your
> > a Liar, I mean lawyer.
>
> You obviously have a very limited understanding of the concept of
> defamation. Terming someone a liar, without proof, is libel or
slander
> per se. However, since your net worth is likely close to the value
of
> your opinions, it's not worth suing you over it.
>
> > You have no buisness posting that **** and obviously you have
nothing
> > intelligent to add to the thread.
>
> Well, since I violated my own rule (Don't Feed The Trolls), I guess
> it's my own fault. G'bye!
> <PLONK>
> --
> C.R. Krieger
> (Been there; done that - fast)



No you're a liar more than you're a lawyer. And you have nothing
intelligent to add to the thread except for your off topic **** that
you are so full of.

wrote:

> No you're a liar more than you're a lawyer. And you have nothing
> intelligent to add to the thread except for your off topic **** that
> you are so full of.

When you fell on your head, did you feel your brain getting damaged?

wrote:

> No you're a liar more than you're a lawyer. And you have nothing
> intelligent to add to the thread except for your off topic **** that
> you are so full of.

When you fell on your head, did you feel your brain getting damaged?

wrote:
> wrote:
> > Who here thinks our Justic system is fair and "just"? Who here
> doesn't
> > agree?
> >
> > For example from what I have observed. Why would the family cour
> > hearing use no Jury? All I saw was a Judge "partialness
> questionable",
> > Defendant, Prosecutor, no visitors (but myslef) lawyers (liars), a
> > social service worker, steinographer, and of course the Bailiff.
> >
> > I thought the whole thing was totally unjust and very very sloppy.
> Why
> > no Jury? Isn't it always up to the jury to decide rather than a
> Judge
> > who is supposed to remain impartial? There were hand gesters and
> > whispering. Both of which seemed really upsetting.
> >
> > Why was there no audio recording much less video taping of the
trial?
> > Why wasn't each person given a microphone that way there will be no
> > dispute about what was said later?
> >
> > After what I have seen I have lost all faith in the Justice system
> and
> > I would be very hellbent to ever need one once the time ever comes.
> > (crosses fingers) I can not truth our Justice system to protect me
> if
> > the need ever arrises.
> >
> > And Traffic Court is another story altogether. Many lawyers
(liars)
> > agree to just pay the ticket or if need by go to court and just
pray
> > that you get off on a technicality. That is the only way to do it
as
> > there is not only NO Jury but NO prosecutor as well. Just a bias
> Judge
> > that will only belive every word that the arresting officer says
and
> > will disregaurd everything the defendant has to say in her
testimony.
> > The Judge also refuses to give the defendant the right to
> > cross-reference the prosecuting officer. Is anyone hearing this
> with
> > first hand experience?
> > Justice system = Oxymoron
> >
> > Hope I never need it...
>
>
>
> Looks like everyone is 100% satisfied with the system than. Either
> that or they are just too ignorant of the fact to actually have
> anything intelligent to say.



A justice system isn't just if it's courts do not allow the right to a
prosecutor as well as a Jury and a lawyer for those who are not
financially able to apoint one themselves.

wrote:
> wrote:
> > Who here thinks our Justic system is fair and "just"? Who here
> doesn't
> > agree?
> >
> > For example from what I have observed. Why would the family cour
> > hearing use no Jury? All I saw was a Judge "partialness
> questionable",
> > Defendant, Prosecutor, no visitors (but myslef) lawyers (liars), a
> > social service worker, steinographer, and of course the Bailiff.
> >
> > I thought the whole thing was totally unjust and very very sloppy.
> Why
> > no Jury? Isn't it always up to the jury to decide rather than a
> Judge
> > who is supposed to remain impartial? There were hand gesters and
> > whispering. Both of which seemed really upsetting.
> >
> > Why was there no audio recording much less video taping of the
trial?
> > Why wasn't each person given a microphone that way there will be no
> > dispute about what was said later?
> >
> > After what I have seen I have lost all faith in the Justice system
> and
> > I would be very hellbent to ever need one once the time ever comes.
> > (crosses fingers) I can not truth our Justice system to protect me
> if
> > the need ever arrises.
> >
> > And Traffic Court is another story altogether. Many lawyers
(liars)
> > agree to just pay the ticket or if need by go to court and just
pray
> > that you get off on a technicality. That is the only way to do it
as
> > there is not only NO Jury but NO prosecutor as well. Just a bias
> Judge
> > that will only belive every word that the arresting officer says
and
> > will disregaurd everything the defendant has to say in her
testimony.
> > The Judge also refuses to give the defendant the right to
> > cross-reference the prosecuting officer. Is anyone hearing this
> with
> > first hand experience?
> > Justice system = Oxymoron
> >
> > Hope I never need it...
>
>
>
> Looks like everyone is 100% satisfied with the system than. Either
> that or they are just too ignorant of the fact to actually have
> anything intelligent to say.



A justice system isn't just if it's courts do not allow the right to a
prosecutor as well as a Jury and a lawyer for those who are not
financially able to apoint one themselves.

> wrote in message
oups.com...
> Who here thinks our Justic system is fair and "just"?

Off hand, I think our resident troll/SFB*, "LBMHB," probablly does
(especially the traffic courts)...

> For example from what I have observed. Why would the family cour
> hearing use no Jury? All I saw was a Judge "partialness
questionable",
> Defendant, Prosecutor, no visitors (but myslef) lawyers (liars), a
> social service worker, steinographer, and of course the Bailiff.
>
> I thought the whole thing was totally unjust and very very sloppy.
Why
> no Jury? Isn't it always up to the jury to decide rather than a Judge
> who is supposed to remain impartial? There were hand gesters and
> whispering. Both of which seemed really upsetting.

Not all trials/courts require a jury (thank God) otherwise all the rest
of us would get in the mail would be summons for jury duty...

> Why was there no audio recording much less video taping of the trial?
> Why wasn't each person given a microphone that way there will be no
> dispute about what was said later?

Illegal in that juristiction, perhaps?

> After what I have seen I have lost all faith in the Justice system and
> I would be very hellbent to ever need one once the time ever comes.
> (crosses fingers) I can not truth our Justice system to protect me if
> the need ever arrises.

Hell, I lost faith in the justice system the day that OJ got away with
it...

<snip>

> Hope I never need it...

Me too...


* SFB = **** For Brains

> wrote in message
oups.com...
> Who here thinks our Justic system is fair and "just"?

Off hand, I think our resident troll/SFB*, "LBMHB," probablly does
(especially the traffic courts)...

> For example from what I have observed. Why would the family cour
> hearing use no Jury? All I saw was a Judge "partialness
questionable",
> Defendant, Prosecutor, no visitors (but myslef) lawyers (liars), a
> social service worker, steinographer, and of course the Bailiff.
>
> I thought the whole thing was totally unjust and very very sloppy.
Why
> no Jury? Isn't it always up to the jury to decide rather than a Judge
> who is supposed to remain impartial? There were hand gesters and
> whispering. Both of which seemed really upsetting.

Not all trials/courts require a jury (thank God) otherwise all the rest
of us would get in the mail would be summons for jury duty...

> Why was there no audio recording much less video taping of the trial?
> Why wasn't each person given a microphone that way there will be no
> dispute about what was said later?

Illegal in that juristiction, perhaps?

> After what I have seen I have lost all faith in the Justice system and
> I would be very hellbent to ever need one once the time ever comes.
> (crosses fingers) I can not truth our Justice system to protect me if
> the need ever arrises.

Hell, I lost faith in the justice system the day that OJ got away with
it...

<snip>

> Hope I never need it...

Me too...


* SFB = **** For Brains