If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
2008 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study: Porsche, Honda, Chevroletamong big winners
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...study_car_news
Porsche, Honda, Chevrolet Among Big Winners in 2008 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study - Car News GM and Ford do well, but Chrysler winds up near the bottom. BY JOSEPH SZCZESNY June 2008 For the third year in a row, Porsche came out on top in the J.D. Power and Associates closely watched annual Initial Quality Survey (IQS) of vehicles sold in the U.S. by three dozen top automotive brands. (The complete rankings can be found on the next page of this article. Click here.) Porsche, which makes its home in Stuttgart, Germany, came out as the top automaker in the annual quality survey, while the Mercedes-Benz plant in Sindelfingen just outside of Stuttgart was named the top assembly plant. Porsche's Stuttgart plant, where the 911 cabriolet and coupe are built, came away with a "Silver" award as one of the best assembly plants in Europe, just ahead of BMW's Regensburg assembly plant. Overall, Mercedes-Benz moved up one place against last year from fifth to fourth in the brand-level ranking, and three Mercedes-Benz models were among the top three of their respective segments. However, vehicles from General Motors, Ford, Toyota, Honda, and Nissan also did well in the survey. For consumers, the survey is considered a good predictor of ownership experience throughout the life of a vehicle, even though it measures buyer satisfaction after a vehicle has been owned for just 90 days, officials from J.D. Power noted. David Sargent, vice president of automotive research at J.D. Power's vehicle group, said the 2008 results reflected a steady "democratization of quality" across the industry. Japanese brands no longer dominate key vehicle categories, noted Sargent, echoing arguments domestic carmakers have been trying to make with only limited success. "All of the manufacturers are doing a really good job," Sargent said as he presented the 2008 survey results to the Automotive Press Association in Detroit. Individual Vehicle Accolades and Overall Improvement The survey also highlights the best vehicle in 17 different segments, ranging from subcompact passenger cars to full-size vans. No manufacturer was tops in more than three categories, Sargent said. However, Honda, which seems to be on a roll this spring, won in the critical subcompact and compact car categories with the Fit and Civic and in the compact activity vehicle with the CR-V. In addition, the Chevrolet Malibu came away with top honors in the highly competitive mid-size car category, much to the satisfaction of General Motors. "Initial quality in the automotive industry has improved significantly in 2008, with substantial gains demonstrated by nearly three-fourths of the 36 ranked nameplates," Sargent noted. Overall quality improved to 118 problems per 100 vehicles in 2008, down from 125 registered in 2007, added Sargent, who noted more than 81,000 consumers participated in the poll. "Due to some strong new-vehicle launches, in addition to a continued reduction in the level of defects and malfunctions, overall quality improved by six percent in 2008, compared with 2007," Sargent said. "This gain is driven not only by strong advances from many of the high- volume brands such as Chevrolet, Ford, and Toyota, but also by very significant improvements by many other automakers.” Sargent added that the industry-wide improvement was driven by automakers’ efforts to listen better to customer opinions and observations and to integrate the feedback into designing, engineering, and manufacturing better vehicles. Flaws Now Blamed More on Initial Engineering, Less on Assembly Where assembly plants used to get a bad rap in earlier surveys, many of the items buyers now find unappealing are design flaws that have to be fixed upstream in the vehicle development process rather than factory defects that are relatively easy to fix, Sargent said. "Considerable work is needed in design quality," around the industry, he said. The introduction of new technology into a vehicle also is a challenge, he said. There are a lot of complaints about the integration of sound system and navigation screens. Manufacturers have to be aware of the challenges as they offer the new technology, he said. Tom Wilkinson, GM spokesman, said the IQS results generally indicate GM's efforts to upgrade the company's models are working. "The Malibu was the fourth-best car in the entire survey," even though it was a brand new model, Wilkinson noted. Meanwhile, Ford moved up to eighth place from tenth, while Mercury moved up two spots to sixth place, just ahead of the Honda brand, noted Ford officials. "For customers who make their purchase decision based on quality, Ford, Lincoln, and Mercury vehicles must be on their shopping lists," said Bennie Fowler, Ford group vice president, Global Quality. "It is gratifying to see our commitment to quality paying off in such recognition by J.D. Power and Associates," he said. The one company that slipped, however, was Chrysler. Chrysler did have the top vehicle in two different segments—the Durango and Dakota topped their segments—but the Chrysler, Dodge, and Jeep brands were in the bottom quarter overall among the 36 brands surveyed. The Jeep brand, in fact, was dead last. The bottom tier also included brands such as MINI, Land Rover, Saturn, Suzuki, and Saab. Chrysler spokesman Ed Saenz acknowledged Chrysler needed to raise the quality scores. "We're not satisfied," he said. "We know we need to do better." |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
2008 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study: Porsche, Honda, Chevroletamong big winners
But the difference between the best to the worst is still only 0.8
problem per car. (Jeep's 167 - Porsche's 87) / 100 > http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ing/latest_new... > > Porsche, Honda, Chevrolet Among Big Winners in 2008 J.D. Power Initial > Quality Study - Car News > > GM and Ford do well, but Chrysler winds up near the bottom. > > BY JOSEPH SZCZESNY > June 2008 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
2008 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study: Porsche, Honda, Chevroletamong big winners
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
2008 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study: Porsche, Honda, Chevrolet among big winners
Consider most Porsche owners are somewhat fanatical about ownership of these
cars and hesitate to complain about mundane issues like the rest of us might. > wrote in message ... http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...study_car_news Porsche, Honda, Chevrolet Among Big Winners in 2008 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study - Car News GM and Ford do well, but Chrysler winds up near the bottom. BY JOSEPH SZCZESNY June 2008 For the third year in a row, Porsche came out on top in the J.D. Power and Associates closely watched annual Initial Quality Survey (IQS) of vehicles sold in the U.S. by three dozen top automotive brands. (The complete rankings can be found on the next page of this article. Click here.) Porsche, which makes its home in Stuttgart, Germany, came out as the top automaker in the annual quality survey, while the Mercedes-Benz plant in Sindelfingen just outside of Stuttgart was named the top assembly plant. Porsche's Stuttgart plant, where the 911 cabriolet and coupe are built, came away with a "Silver" award as one of the best assembly plants in Europe, just ahead of BMW's Regensburg assembly plant. Overall, Mercedes-Benz moved up one place against last year from fifth to fourth in the brand-level ranking, and three Mercedes-Benz models were among the top three of their respective segments. However, vehicles from General Motors, Ford, Toyota, Honda, and Nissan also did well in the survey. For consumers, the survey is considered a good predictor of ownership experience throughout the life of a vehicle, even though it measures buyer satisfaction after a vehicle has been owned for just 90 days, officials from J.D. Power noted. David Sargent, vice president of automotive research at J.D. Power's vehicle group, said the 2008 results reflected a steady "democratization of quality" across the industry. Japanese brands no longer dominate key vehicle categories, noted Sargent, echoing arguments domestic carmakers have been trying to make with only limited success. "All of the manufacturers are doing a really good job," Sargent said as he presented the 2008 survey results to the Automotive Press Association in Detroit. Individual Vehicle Accolades and Overall Improvement The survey also highlights the best vehicle in 17 different segments, ranging from subcompact passenger cars to full-size vans. No manufacturer was tops in more than three categories, Sargent said. However, Honda, which seems to be on a roll this spring, won in the critical subcompact and compact car categories with the Fit and Civic and in the compact activity vehicle with the CR-V. In addition, the Chevrolet Malibu came away with top honors in the highly competitive mid-size car category, much to the satisfaction of General Motors. "Initial quality in the automotive industry has improved significantly in 2008, with substantial gains demonstrated by nearly three-fourths of the 36 ranked nameplates," Sargent noted. Overall quality improved to 118 problems per 100 vehicles in 2008, down from 125 registered in 2007, added Sargent, who noted more than 81,000 consumers participated in the poll. "Due to some strong new-vehicle launches, in addition to a continued reduction in the level of defects and malfunctions, overall quality improved by six percent in 2008, compared with 2007," Sargent said. "This gain is driven not only by strong advances from many of the high- volume brands such as Chevrolet, Ford, and Toyota, but also by very significant improvements by many other automakers.” Sargent added that the industry-wide improvement was driven by automakers’ efforts to listen better to customer opinions and observations and to integrate the feedback into designing, engineering, and manufacturing better vehicles. Flaws Now Blamed More on Initial Engineering, Less on Assembly Where assembly plants used to get a bad rap in earlier surveys, many of the items buyers now find unappealing are design flaws that have to be fixed upstream in the vehicle development process rather than factory defects that are relatively easy to fix, Sargent said. "Considerable work is needed in design quality," around the industry, he said. The introduction of new technology into a vehicle also is a challenge, he said. There are a lot of complaints about the integration of sound system and navigation screens. Manufacturers have to be aware of the challenges as they offer the new technology, he said. Tom Wilkinson, GM spokesman, said the IQS results generally indicate GM's efforts to upgrade the company's models are working. "The Malibu was the fourth-best car in the entire survey," even though it was a brand new model, Wilkinson noted. Meanwhile, Ford moved up to eighth place from tenth, while Mercury moved up two spots to sixth place, just ahead of the Honda brand, noted Ford officials. "For customers who make their purchase decision based on quality, Ford, Lincoln, and Mercury vehicles must be on their shopping lists," said Bennie Fowler, Ford group vice president, Global Quality. "It is gratifying to see our commitment to quality paying off in such recognition by J.D. Power and Associates," he said. The one company that slipped, however, was Chrysler. Chrysler did have the top vehicle in two different segments—the Durango and Dakota topped their segments—but the Chrysler, Dodge, and Jeep brands were in the bottom quarter overall among the 36 brands surveyed. The Jeep brand, in fact, was dead last. The bottom tier also included brands such as MINI, Land Rover, Saturn, Suzuki, and Saab. Chrysler spokesman Ed Saenz acknowledged Chrysler needed to raise the quality scores. "We're not satisfied," he said. "We know we need to do better." ----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
2008 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study: Porsche, Honda, Chevrolet among big winners
"Shep" > wrote in message ... > Consider most Porsche owners are somewhat fanatical about ownership of > these cars and hesitate to complain about mundane issues like the rest of > us might. I'd guess just the reverse is true. When a car fanatic spends the big (ultrabig!) bucks for a Porsche, I'd bet he'd head to the dealership if there was a click in the windshield wiper, or a slightly crooked something or other that bugged him, whereas joe sixpack would ignore it. I used to be the roommate of a Porsche owner, and he wanted perfection at all times in any weather and was not about to put up with any imperfections. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
2008 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study: Porsche, Honda, Chevrolet among big winners
Great discussion, the mentality is just like Corvette owner's choice of
this " world" renowned car makes them less likely to voice dissatisfaction with their purchase. The initial quality survey is sent to owners who check off boxes related to quality. If the survey was done off warranty records, the result may be different. My friend has a Z06, which has had a number of complex driveability issues, he still loves the car. "mack" > wrote in message ... > > "Shep" > wrote in message > ... >> Consider most Porsche owners are somewhat fanatical about ownership of >> these cars and hesitate to complain about mundane issues like the rest of >> us might. > I'd guess just the reverse is true. When a car fanatic spends the big > (ultrabig!) bucks for a Porsche, I'd bet he'd head to the dealership if > there was a click in the windshield wiper, or a slightly crooked something > or other that bugged him, whereas joe sixpack would ignore it. I used to > be the roommate of a Porsche owner, and he wanted perfection at all > times in any weather and was not about to put up with any imperfections. > > ----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
2008 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study: Porsche, Honda, Chevrolet among big winners
> wrote in message ... > But the difference between the best to the worst is still only 0.8 > problem per car. (Jeep's 167 - Porsche's 87) / 100 > > > >> http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ing/latest_new... >> >> Porsche, Honda, Chevrolet Among Big Winners in 2008 J.D. Power Initial >> Quality Study - Car News >> >> GM and Ford do well, but Chrysler winds up near the bottom. >> >> BY JOSEPH SZCZESNY >> June 2008 But doesn't that also mean, on average, every Jeep has almost two problems for Porsche's one? That's not so minor. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
2008 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study: Porsche, Honda, Chevroletamong big winners
wrote:
> However, vehicles from General Motors, Ford, Toyota, Honda, and Nissan > also did well in the survey. For consumers, the survey is considered a > good predictor of ownership experience throughout the life of a > vehicle, even though it measures buyer satisfaction after a vehicle ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ > has been owned for just 90 days, officials from J.D. Power noted. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This is why I can't possibly see how J.D. Power surveys are useful in determining anything other than initial quality which is what they are designed to measure. And I actually am a big believer in Porsches, I just don't think that J.D. Power results mean squat to anyone who's going to keep their car after the warranty runs out. nate -- replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply. http://members.cox.net/njnagel |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
2008 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study: Porsche, Honda, Chevroletamong big winners
mack wrote:
> "Shep" > wrote in message ... > >>Consider most Porsche owners are somewhat fanatical about ownership of >>these cars and hesitate to complain about mundane issues like the rest of >>us might. > > I'd guess just the reverse is true. When a car fanatic spends the big > (ultrabig!) bucks for a Porsche, I'd bet he'd head to the dealership if > there was a click in the windshield wiper, or a slightly crooked something > or other that bugged him, whereas joe sixpack would ignore it. I used to be > the roommate of a Porsche owner, and he wanted perfection at all times in > any weather and was not about to put up with any imperfections. > > Absolutely. If I paid that much $$$ for a new car I'd expect it to be damn perfect. You're not spending all that money to look cool (hopefully) you are spending it because you appreciate engineering excellence. nate -- replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply. http://members.cox.net/njnagel |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
All hale teh krlrgrz, for he hace much Gratness!!1!! (was WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, January 2008 | Archie Leach[_13_] | Driving | 22 | February 12th 08 03:32 PM |
Honda CRV quality? | Herpster1966 | Honda | 16 | February 20th 06 06:58 PM |
honda quality parts advice | Rob B | Honda | 33 | January 25th 06 04:36 PM |
2005 Grand Caravan Initial Poor Quality - Body Control Electronics Module Failure | michaelcjeep | Chrysler | 6 | August 18th 05 09:36 PM |