If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
I leave the lights on all the time on my car. They go off when I kill
the ignition and open the door; they go back on when I start the car. I feel it increases my conspicuity, and it hurts nothing. I'm happy. I do about 30,000 miles a year in that car. My wife's car, which I drive rarely, does not handle the lights like that, so I've been known to drive in the rain without lights. I usually remember, but not every single time. Steve will say that my brain is separated from reality at the time, and that might be true, but habit is a powerful force. Yet, some people run around with this brain-reality separation a large percentage of the time. I also agree with HLS -- many people just don't give a damn. Would switching the lights on with the wipers make people stupid? I don't think they would any more than automatic tranmissions, anti-lock brakes, safety glass, air bags, seat belts, or any of the other built-in safety or convenience devices already in use. What they would do is ensure that the lights go on with the wipers whether the A-hole behind the wheel wants them on or not. |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
I also leave my lights on all the time. Following shutting off the
engine, the lights turn off automatically when I open the door (2003 Mitsu). Even if I left them in the high beam position, when the car re-starts they turn on in low beam, probably the case with most newer cars. If the automatics are re-illuminating in high beam, it's bad design. Automatic dimming is also a possibility. Would it be great if the human moron quotient weren't so high, and people just took such things seriously? Of course, but such is not the case. The idiots who tick me off even more than the high-beam-in-your-face pinheads are the ones who drive at what they consider "dusk" and other low-light conditions with their parking lights on. PARKING lights. PARKING. Get it??? Dan HLS wrote: > "Steve" > wrote in message > ... > >>Frank wrote: >> >>>A simple switch that would turn the lights on with the wipers would >>>help. It wouldn't be perfect, but at least most people in those >>>vehicles wouldn't keep driving around in heavy rainstorms without >>>lights. >>> >> >>No, a simple connection between the driver's brain and reality is what >>would help. >> >>Turning on headlamps with wipers would cause the same stupidity I see >>already with ambient-light based automatic headlamps: the idiot driver >>doesn't pay ANY attention to his headlamps, so when they come on at dusk >>they often are on high-beam (last used the night before) and the idiot >>keeps driving around blinding everyone while not even aware that his >>lights are on. > > > AMEN!! > > |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 09:20:08 -0400, Dan
> wrote: >I also leave my lights on all the time. Following shutting off the >engine, the lights turn off automatically when I open the door (2003 >Mitsu). Even if I left them in the high beam position, when the car >re-starts they turn on in low beam, probably the case with most newer >cars. If the automatics are re-illuminating in high beam, it's bad >design. Automatic dimming is also a possibility. Would it be great if >the human moron quotient weren't so high, and people just took such >things seriously? Of course, but such is not the case. > >The idiots who tick me off even more than the high-beam-in-your-face >pinheads are the ones who drive at what they consider "dusk" and other >low-light conditions with their parking lights on. PARKING lights. >PARKING. Get it??? in france, in the city, that's what they do. actually, i found it better. no bright lights in your face. as with bicycles, there is a difference betwen "seeing" and "being seen". here in North America we have dumbed down this point so far that we now have DRL. ....thehick |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
"HLS" > wrote in message .. . > > "Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message > n.umich.edu... > > On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, HLS wrote: > > > > > DRL's are, IMHO, better than nothing at all, even if the tail lights do > > > not activate, but if would be better if the systems were fully > > > automatic. > > > > No, it would be better if the systems were designed to optimize the DRL > > function and encourage proper, rather than improper, driver operation of > > vehicle lighting systems. > > > > DS > > And what, in your opinion, would the ideal system consist of? Maybe you missed this, Daniel... I respect your opinions and knowledge on lighting. What should the ideal system be, considering the driver as part of the equation? |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Actually Dodge had an automatic headlight system on the Caravans that I
really liked. It turned on ALL the lights when you started the engine, just like you turned on the switch. No need to touch the switch unless you needed lights on with ignition off. You could also switch the headlights off by twisting the switch back momentarily. -- Steve Williams "James C. Reeves" > wrote in message ... > > "HLS" > wrote in message > ... > >I more or less agree, Daniel. > > > > I dont know if you are speaking to Canadian law, or whether those points > > apply in the USA as well. > > > > DRL's are, IMHO, better than nothing at all, > > According to insurance loss data over several years, they appear to have no > benefit. > > > even if the tail lights do not > > activate, > > but if would be better if the systems were fully automatic. > > And how would one make them *fully* automatic? In daytime snow/fog > conditions when *all* lights are required in most states, there has not been > a "auto" system made yet that works reliably. Even those that use BOTH a > ambient light level sensor AND wiper use as the light "activation triggers". > Often when the snow is dry or it's foggy, wipers aren't always required. So > they can't trigger the lights to come on. Also, if it's daylight, it > *might* be dark enough to trigger then lights, but often it isn't. So what > other mechanism could "activate" the real lights *reliably* in those > situations (except a manual switch controlled by the driver)? If you have a > idea, let the car companies know. So far thay haven't found a "auto" system > that actually works properly yet. > > > > > So many idiots ignore the law here in Texas which says that you should > > activate your headlights in rain, after legal dark, etc. Many never do it > > except in darkest night.. > > That's because many actually think that they're "auto" headlight system > really works (because the salesman told them so...gee wiz!) and they don't > turn their light on themselves (probably never do)...yet it only works > reliably in the "darkness of night". There you have it. > > > > > There are kits available which reduce the current to the headlights and > > turn > > on lights whenever the key is on, BUT I don't think these activate > > taillights. > > > > I was thinking about homebrewing a system, but will continue to just turn > > on > > my headlights manually for the time being. > > > > > > ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Frank wrote:
> I leave the lights on all the time on my car. They go off when I kill > the ignition and open the door; they go back on when I start the car. > I feel it increases my conspicuity, and it hurts nothing. I'm happy. > I do about 30,000 miles a year in that car. > > My wife's car, which I drive rarely, does not handle the lights like > that, so I've been known to drive in the rain without lights. I > usually remember, but not every single time. Steve will say that my > brain is separated from reality at the time, and that might be true, > but habit is a powerful force. > > Yet, some people run around with this brain-reality separation a large > percentage of the time. I also agree with HLS -- many people just > don't give a damn. Would switching the lights on with the wipers make > people stupid? I don't think they would any more than automatic > tranmissions, anti-lock brakes, safety glass, air bags, seat belts, or > any of the other built-in safety or convenience devices already in use. > What they would do is ensure that the lights go on with the wipers > whether the A-hole behind the wheel wants them on or not. > So if the A-hole behind the wheel uses Rain-X and never turns on his wipers, then what? What about when a driver turns his wipers on to clean the windshield, but (oops!) had his high-beams on last night and so now he blinds everyone driving toward him in total blissful ignorance? Increasing automation only aggravates the problem, and no I don't see it as the same as autmoatic transmissions or (for heaven's sake!) safety glass at all. None of the things you mentioned relieve the driver of the basic requirements of operating the vehicle properly. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
HLS wrote:
> > "Steve" > wrote in message > ... > > Frank wrote: > > > A simple switch that would turn the lights on with the wipers would > > > help. It wouldn't be perfect, but at least most people in those > > > vehicles wouldn't keep driving around in heavy rainstorms without > > > lights. > > > > > > > No, a simple connection between the driver's brain and reality is what > > would help. > > > > Turning on headlamps with wipers would cause the same stupidity I see > > already with ambient-light based automatic headlamps: the idiot driver > > doesn't pay ANY attention to his headlamps, so when they come on at dusk > > they often are on high-beam (last used the night before) and the idiot > > keeps driving around blinding everyone while not even aware that his > > lights are on. > I seem to recall a dimmer switch design that operated as follows: The dimmer switch, a stalk to the right of the steering wheel was a momentary contact device. Push it forward and it engaged a latching relay to select high beams. Pull it back and it released the latch. When the headlights were turned off, the latching relay (powered from the same source) dropped into the low beam position. This was many years ago on some European car and I've never seen this setup since. Too bad. If one needs tactile feedback from the position of the dimmer switch, it shouldn't be too much trouble to incorporate an electromagnetic latch to hold the dimmer switch position. -- Paul Hovnanian ------------------------------------------------------------------ Big business never pays a nickel in taxes, according to Ralph Nader, who represents a big consumer organization that never pays a nickel in taxes. -- Dave Barry |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
flat towing instructions | [email protected] | Jeep | 44 | February 7th 05 06:51 AM |
New *FREE* Corvette Discussion Forum | JLA ENTERPRISES TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATION | Corvette | 12 | November 30th 04 06:36 PM |
VW Golf 3 rear fog lights | Joseph Meehan | VW water cooled | 6 | October 30th 04 02:14 AM |
E30 Rear lights check relay | jack morantz | BMW | 0 | October 28th 04 11:31 PM |
BMW service lights in the UK | spammy | BMW | 3 | September 18th 04 06:55 PM |