If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Smart cars coming to the US
Eeyore > wrote in
: > > > Jim Yanik wrote: > >> Eeyore > wrote in >> : >> >> >> > Erik Meltzer wrote: >> > >> >> most cars have more wheelbase than a Smart is long, even here >> > >> > There's a reason for that. >> > >> > The Smart car has such a short wheelbase that *any* side impact is >> > guaranteed to hit at least one axle. This distributes the forces >> > and makes it much better equipped than most cars in a side impact. >> > Lower chance of cabin intrusion. >> > >> > Graham >> >> How reassuring. > > It's a damn sight Smarter than having the cabin speared ! In short, > the Smart car has far better side impact durability by Smart design. > > Graham > I noted on one Smart site that for the US,the car must be lengthened 7 inches,made heavier,among other changes. -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
Ads |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Smart cars coming to the US
"Scott en Aztlán" wrote: > On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 03:31:10 +0100, Eeyore > > wrote: > > >Jim Yanik wrote: > > > >> Eeyore > wrote in > >> : > >> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> Jim Yanik > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >Get a typical "driver" behind the wheel on the freeway,and they > >> >> >"lose control" and that Smart car is going to roll over quicker than > >> >> >a cheap ho on a Saturday night "date". > >> >> > >> >> are you sure abt this? > >> > > >> > It's just typical naysaying. > >> > > >> > Graham > >> > >> No,short wheelbase autos are far more sensitive to steering inputs than > >> cars with longer wheelbases. > > > >Like go-karts ? > > The go-karts I drove as a kid all had a center of gravity > approximately 12 inches off the ground, making them almost impossible > to flip. Exactly ! > The same cannot be said of the Smart. The Smart car has a very low CG compared to most cars. > Also, go-karts are > typically driven at very low speeds - not at 80 MPH in freeway > traffic. Go-karts also don't have a protective cage ! > >> That makes them more vulnerable to driver > >> error,and harder to recover from an error,particularly at higher speeds > >> such as on freeways. It's plain physics. > > > >It's plain driver skill. > > I agree that, as the vehicle's center of gravity goes up, the easier > it is to flip and the more driver skill it requires to keep it from > flipping. So look at the CG ! Graham |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Smart cars coming to the US
Jim Yanik wrote: > I noted on one Smart site that for the US,the car must be lengthened 7 > inches,made heavier,among other changes. So ? Your country insists on daft measures that don't relate to real safety ? Please elaborate. Graham |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Smart cars coming to the US
On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 18:49:01 +0100, Eeyore
> wrote: > > >"Scott en Aztlán" wrote: > >> On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 03:31:10 +0100, Eeyore >> > wrote: >> >> >Jim Yanik wrote: >> > >> >> Eeyore > wrote in >> >> : >> >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Jim Yanik > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >Get a typical "driver" behind the wheel on the freeway,and they >> >> >> >"lose control" and that Smart car is going to roll over quicker than >> >> >> >a cheap ho on a Saturday night "date". >> >> >> >> >> >> are you sure abt this? >> >> > >> >> > It's just typical naysaying. >> >> > >> >> > Graham >> >> >> >> No,short wheelbase autos are far more sensitive to steering inputs than >> >> cars with longer wheelbases. >> > >> >Like go-karts ? >> >> The go-karts I drove as a kid all had a center of gravity >> approximately 12 inches off the ground, making them almost impossible >> to flip. > >Exactly ! > > >> The same cannot be said of the Smart. > >The Smart car has a very low CG compared to most cars. > > >> Also, go-karts are >> typically driven at very low speeds - not at 80 MPH in freeway >> traffic. > >Go-karts also don't have a protective cage ! Some of the karts I drove in the 60's did 90 mph, and still didn't have a roll cage. DPH > > >> >> That makes them more vulnerable to driver >> >> error,and harder to recover from an error,particularly at higher speeds >> >> such as on freeways. It's plain physics. >> > >> >It's plain driver skill. >> >> I agree that, as the vehicle's center of gravity goes up, the easier >> it is to flip and the more driver skill it requires to keep it from >> flipping. > >So look at the CG ! > >Graham |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Smart cars coming to the US
Dave Head > wrote in
: > On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 18:49:01 +0100, Eeyore m> wrote: > >> >> >>"Scott en Aztlán" wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 03:31:10 +0100, Eeyore >>> > wrote: >>> >>> >Jim Yanik wrote: >>> > >>> >> Eeyore > wrote >>> >> in : >>> >> >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> >> Jim Yanik > wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >Get a typical "driver" behind the wheel on the freeway,and >>> >> >> >they "lose control" and that Smart car is going to roll over >>> >> >> >quicker than a cheap ho on a Saturday night "date". >>> >> >> >>> >> >> are you sure abt this? >>> >> > >>> >> > It's just typical naysaying. >>> >> > >>> >> > Graham >>> >> >>> >> No,short wheelbase autos are far more sensitive to steering >>> >> inputs than cars with longer wheelbases. >>> > >>> >Like go-karts ? >>> >>> The go-karts I drove as a kid all had a center of gravity >>> approximately 12 inches off the ground, making them almost >>> impossible to flip. >> >>Exactly ! >> >> >>> The same cannot be said of the Smart. >> >>The Smart car has a very low CG compared to most cars. >> >> >>> Also, go-karts are >>> typically driven at very low speeds - not at 80 MPH in freeway >>> traffic. >> >>Go-karts also don't have a protective cage ! > > Some of the karts I drove in the 60's did 90 mph, and still didn't > have a roll cage. > > DPH Shifter karts used in racing do not have a roll cage,except perhaps for young children's classes.They also hit up to 100 MPH,depending on the track length.They also spin out,flip or cartwheel spectacularly,when limits are exceeded. But the point is,in racing,the drivers pay intense attention to their driving,while ordinary people on the highways do NOT pay such close attention. The point is,short wheelbase autos are far more sensitive to steering inputs and have less leeway for error,and that is what's going to matter on the freeways,with real people doing the driving.(not racers or experts) I also note that the Smart is higher than it is wide,and the occupants sit up higher.So it may NOT have a "low" COG....with people in it. -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Smart cars coming to the US
Jim Yanik wrote: > I also note that the Smart is higher than it is wide,and the occupants sit > up higher.So it may NOT have a "low" COG....with people in it. It'll still be a heck of a lot better than any SUV ! Graham |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Smart cars coming to the US
Jim Yanik wrote: > I noted on one Smart site that for the US,the car must be lengthened 7 > inches,made heavier,among other changes. All that tells you is how backward US regulations are. Graham |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Smart cars coming to the US
Erik Meltzer wrote: > Hi! > > N8N wrote: [snip] >> I'd consider the Mini far more practical than a Smart, > > Only in that it seats four. And there are plenty of more > practical -- and inexpensive -- cars to do that than a Mini. > > Yours, > Erik. My experience in MINI is that it's actually two-seater car when two slightly tall guys sit in the front. All of legroom vanished when they pulled the seats all the way back to accommodate our long legs. A person would have to sit transversely in the rear seat or none if we are carrying luggage. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Smart cars coming to the US
Jim Yanik wrote:
> > I noted on one Smart site that for the US, the car must be lengthened 7 > inches, made heavier, among other changes. Nope, it's common for the manufacturers to 'enlarge' their vehicles slightly with each generation. It is due to increasing consumer demand for more and more features as well as increasing requirements for stronger safety features. They add weight considerably. One example is the new EU regulations for pedestrian safety which forced many manufacturers to lengthen or raise the bonnet as to give more 'cushion' space between bonnet and motor. Look at Peugeot 407 with its awkward-looking front overhang. That is not the reason why Smart car has to be lengthened for US market. For example, the new Mercedes-Benz S-Class (W221 body type) is substantially larger than the outgoing model (W220) it replaced. It's also true for Volkswagen Golf Mk5 which is much larger than the original Golf Mk1. The new MINI is much bigger than the original Mini because of different safety requirements to-day. Canada has similar safety regulations as US with minor variations in lighting and labelling requirement, and Smart cars have been selling there for about a year now. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Smart cars coming to the US
OM > wrote in :
> Jim Yanik wrote: >> >> I noted on one Smart site that for the US, the car must be lengthened 7 >> inches, made heavier, among other changes. > > Nope, it's common for the manufacturers to 'enlarge' their vehicles > slightly with each generation. It is due to increasing consumer demand > for more and more features as well as increasing requirements for > stronger safety features. They add weight considerably. No,this is a REQUIREMENT of the US before the auto may be imported into the US. It's not any manufacturing change;Mercedes would prefer to bring the cars in as they are currently made. > > One example is the new EU regulations for pedestrian safety which forced > many manufacturers to lengthen or raise the bonnet as to give more > 'cushion' space between bonnet and motor. Look at Peugeot 407 with its > awkward-looking front overhang. That is not the reason why Smart car has > to be lengthened for US market. the site I checked did not give a specific reason for the lengthening. It just said US regs required it. -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
50 Fastest Muscle Cars Showdown -- an Update | [email protected] | Ford Mustang | 4 | June 25th 06 12:45 AM |
Thank An Enviromentalist / Democrat | Dave Head | Driving | 80 | May 14th 06 01:37 AM |
8 foot long Smart Cars coming to america. | cLIeNUX user | Driving | 0 | July 24th 05 05:45 AM |
European Cars Least Reliable | Richard Schulman | VW water cooled | 3 | November 11th 04 09:41 AM |