If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Radar invisible car???
For the last couple of weeks there's been a roadside radar in my
neighborhood. I've driven by it about 5 times and it COMPLETELY is incorrect in reading my vette. It reads 18-20 MPH when I'm going 35-40. I'm certainly not complaining, but wondering if radar is inheriently bad at reading a low profile car like mine. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Larry Bud" > wrote in message oups.com... > For the last couple of weeks there's been a roadside radar in my > neighborhood. I've driven by it about 5 times and it COMPLETELY is > incorrect in reading my vette. It reads 18-20 MPH when I'm going > 35-40. > > I'm certainly not complaining, but wondering if radar is inheriently > bad at reading a low profile car like mine. > About a year ago, I was walking down a street in Central MA (forget the town, but Northeast of Southboro). As I passed a radar trailer with NO automobile traffic on the road, it flashed me as "38". Remember, I was walking, and I wasn't even walking at a brisk pace, probably 3MPH at best. Several months ago, I passed a radar trailer on I-90W driving a Ford Ranger (about as UN-low profile as you can get). I believe I was still in NY state at the time. I had the cruise control set on 72, and my speed was pretty close to that, according to my speedometer. According to the radar trailer, I was driving 86MPH. (I don't THINK so!!!) Yeah, the speedometer could have been a little off, but not that far. At 60MPH in the same vehicle, it takes 60 seconds to travel one mile. (I did this test to double-check it) It's not your car. Radar is very inaccurate. In fact, it probably shouldn't be used for speed measurement at all. -Dave |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Scott en Aztl=E1n wrote: > On 31 May 2005 05:57:45 -0700, "Larry Bud" > > wrote: > > >For the last couple of weeks there's been a roadside radar in my > >neighborhood. I've driven by it about 5 times and it COMPLETELY is > >incorrect in reading my vette. It reads 18-20 MPH when I'm going > >35-40. > > > >I'm certainly not complaining, but wondering if radar is inheriently > >bad at reading a low profile car like mine. > > Don't I wish! > > Despite the plastic body, low profile, and HID projector headlamps > (which lack the huge reflectors of older types of headlights) I've > driven past those signs and they have shown an accurate reading on my > C6. > > I think that sign is just on the fritz. It seemed to be reading accurately on the cars that were in front of me, however. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Larry Bud" > wrote in
oups.com: > For the last couple of weeks there's been a roadside radar in my > neighborhood. I've driven by it about 5 times and it COMPLETELY is > incorrect in reading my vette. It reads 18-20 MPH when I'm going > 35-40. > > I'm certainly not complaining, but wondering if radar is inheriently > bad at reading a low profile car like mine. > > Vettes have a fiberglas body,a radiator that leans downward,thus creating a low radar profile. I read that in a Car and Driver mag several years ago. -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
In article >,
Scott en Aztlán <newsgroup> wrote: >On 31 May 2005 05:57:45 -0700, "Larry Bud" > >wrote: > >>For the last couple of weeks there's been a roadside radar in my >>neighborhood. I've driven by it about 5 times and it COMPLETELY is >>incorrect in reading my vette. It reads 18-20 MPH when I'm going >>35-40. >> >>I'm certainly not complaining, but wondering if radar is inheriently >>bad at reading a low profile car like mine. > >Don't I wish! > >Despite the plastic body, low profile, and HID projector headlamps >(which lack the huge reflectors of older types of headlights) I've >driven past those signs and they have shown an accurate reading on my >C6. > >I think that sign is just on the fritz. The radar trailer that sometimes appears on my street gives rapidly varying readouts most of the time. It can lock onto a very nearby car. -- John Carr ) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Jim Yanik wrote: > "Larry Bud" > wrote in > oups.com: > > > For the last couple of weeks there's been a roadside radar in my > > neighborhood. I've driven by it about 5 times and it COMPLETELY is > > incorrect in reading my vette. It reads 18-20 MPH when I'm going > > 35-40. > > > > I'm certainly not complaining, but wondering if radar is inheriently > > bad at reading a low profile car like mine. > > > > > > Vettes have a fiberglas body,a radiator that leans downward,thus creating a > low radar profile. I read that in a Car and Driver mag several years ago. The radiator in a C4 is not slanted at all. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
>>It's not your car. Radar is very inaccurate. In fact, it probably >>shouldn't be used for speed measurement at all. -Dave > > Radar is actually very accurate. What is inaccurate is the interpretation > of the readings. Traffic radar does not tell you what object is causing > the > reading, so you have to guess. The guessing part is where most mistakes > are > made. But if you are the only moving object in the area and the reading is wrong, that means that the radar is inaccurate, and there is nothing to interpret. It is not uncommon for a radar reading to be WAY OFF, even if it is reading the only moving object in front of it. -Dave |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Larry Bud" > wrote in
oups.com: > > > Jim Yanik wrote: >> "Larry Bud" > wrote in >> oups.com: >> >> > For the last couple of weeks there's been a roadside radar in my >> > neighborhood. I've driven by it about 5 times and it COMPLETELY is >> > incorrect in reading my vette. It reads 18-20 MPH when I'm going >> > 35-40. >> > >> > I'm certainly not complaining, but wondering if radar is >> > inheriently bad at reading a low profile car like mine. >> > >> > >> >> Vettes have a fiberglas body,a radiator that leans downward,thus >> creating a low radar profile. I read that in a Car and Driver mag >> several years ago. > > The radiator in a C4 is not slanted at all. > > Note I was referring to an article SEVERAL YEARS AGO. Forgive me for trying to help you. -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
LIDAR Trial this Week | [email protected] | Driving | 17 | April 9th 06 02:44 AM |
Valentine 1 - Radar Miracles | [email protected] | Driving | 14 | January 5th 05 06:14 PM |
Where to get Official Speed Limit Info | [email protected] | Driving | 40 | January 3rd 05 07:10 AM |
Invisible License Plates | aRKay | Corvette | 12 | September 14th 04 03:32 AM |