If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Gas station economics lesson
Truck needed fuel, so I waited for the witching hour (10pm) when gas
prices drop for an hour around here. Drove past a Shell offering Regular at 89.9¢, but I have a beef with Shell at the moment, and I try to buy Esso when possible, for their fuel has the lowest Sulphur content of any available in this market. I pulled onto the forecourt of the nearest Esso and stopped at a pump. I got out, and noticed a professionally-printed, laminated sign affixed to each pump: the sign indicated that they had sold out of regular, and so were selling high-test at the price of regular. The price? 88.5¢, a relative bargain in this market lately. As I filled the truck's big tank, it occurred to me that something's fishy here. Usually you get three grades of gasoline. Regular low-test and premium high-test are stored in separate underground tanks. Mid-test is made by means of the pump blending regular with high-test. The unit price difference between regular and mid-test, and between mid-test and high-test is generally a dime, give or take a few pennies. So, at this particular Esso, that would've been 88.5¢ for regular, 98.5¢ for mid-test, and $1.085 for high-test. And yet, there they were, selling the high-test for 88.5¢. The last time I saw high-test for 88.5¢, regular was 68.5¢ or thereabouts. That they could keep the station open, pay the power bill and pay the employee with the unit price of high-test slashed 20¢ (an 18.4% price cut) tells us something about the fat profit margins the oil companies swear up and down don't exist. If those margins didn't exist, then this evening's pricing would've been a red-ink experience and they'd've simply closed the station, at least for gasoline sales. DS |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Gas station economics lesson
Daniel J. Stern wrote: <brevity snip>
> That they could keep the station open, pay the power bill and pay the > employee with the unit price of high-test slashed 20? (an 18.4% price cut) > tells us something about the fat profit margins the oil companies swear up > and down don't exist. ----- Oil companies are publicly owned. Their profits are a matter of public record. None deny their profits and they shouldn't have to. As long as consumers create demand exceeding supply profits will remain exactly as you and I would like if we owned oil company stock. If you find the profits of petroleum comapnies objectionable don't buy, or reduce your consumption of, petroleum related products. That's capitalism at work, baby... ----- - gpsman |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Gas station economics lesson
Daniel J. Stern wrote:
> Truck needed fuel, so I waited for the witching hour (10pm) when gas > prices drop for an hour around here. Drove past a Shell offering Regular > at 89.9?, but I have a beef with Shell at the moment, and I try to buy > Esso when possible, for their fuel has the lowest Sulphur content of any > available in this market. As can be seen at http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/envision/air/sig/2004.htm ..... > The unit price > difference between regular and mid-test, and between mid-test and > high-test is generally a dime, give or take a few pennies. So, at this > particular Esso, that would've been 88.5? for regular, 98.5? for mid-test, > and $1.085 for high-test. When premium unleaded became available in Toronto, back in the '80s, premium was 1 or 2 cents/litre more. Gas prices were around 40-50 cents/litre for regular, as I recall. (I recall one small independent station in Kingston which charged the same price for regular or premium!) Petro-Canada introduced mid-grade gasoline somewhere around 1990. Their nifty marketing concept was three grades, and the price difference between each grade was the same as the generally-accepted difference between regular and premium. As I recall, the original price gaps Petro-Canada posted were 1.5 cents/litre. Base price per litre in the early '90s went up some due to the first gulf war--as high as 60-70 cents/litre for regular. > And yet, there they were, selling the high-test for 88.5?. The last time I > saw high-test for 88.5?, regular was 68.5? or thereabouts. > > That they could keep the station open, pay the power bill and pay the > employee with the unit price of high-test slashed 20? (an 18.4% price cut) > tells us something about the fat profit margins the oil companies swear up > and down don't exist. If those margins didn't exist, then this evening's > pricing would've been a red-ink experience and they'd've simply closed the > station, at least for gasoline sales. So in 1990, you could have bough regular/midgrade/premium for say 50.0/51.5/53.0. Today, you can buy regular/midgrade/premium for 90.0/100.0/110.0. The gas station may or may not be making a profit selling premium for 20 cents off. I bet they would lose a lot of money selling regular for 20 cents off. Conclusion: the fat profits come from those folks who prefer, or are required, to use premium gasoline. (And the ones who buy "special deals" of pop and a candy bar for $2.22....) By the way, a lot of your postings, including this one I'm replying to, are showing up with a border which I think is trn-speak for "HTML-format posting" They mostly are not multi-part mime, though.. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Gas station economics lesson
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Gas station economics lesson
In article ch.edu>, Daniel J. Stern wrote:
> Yep. And yet the oil companies carry on bitching and moaning about their > almost-nonexistent profit margins at the gas pump (even as they post > record billion-dollar quarterly profits...) and the government carries on > making periodic lackadaisical "investigations" into gas prices, never > finding any evidence of funny business. Supposedly, the station owners don't make much on the sale of gasoline. However, I don't understand how that is. But then again, there is a station not far from me that has had their car wash open but the pumps shut down for about a year or more now as they reconfigure the layout of the place. They seem to be in no rush to get the pumps operating again. However little or much the station owners make doesn't have any bearing on the actual profits of the oil company. Since the oil company profits are in the wholesale price. If you read some the alternative media, you'll find that in the 1990s when gasoline prices were very low it was due to over capacity, over supply. Too much refined gasoline. Big oil companies then decided to start buying up independent refineries and then closing them. This reduced capacity and supply and has increased profits. Thanks to environmental regulations and more importantly the political climate, capitialism cannot correct the situation by new players being brought in attracted by the high prices and potentional profits to undercut big oil. Big oil will tell us they closed refineries etc because of the environmental regulations. I believe this is a big lie. Oil companies are using the regulations, NIMBY, etc as market protections. It protects them from competition. > Ummm...that's odd, because I'm using a mailreader (PINE) that's about as > far from an HTML-generator as it's possible to get. Your posts are often coming up in MIME and a bit munged by it |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Gas station economics lesson
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Mike T. wrote:
>> And yet the oil companies carry on bitching and moaning about their >> almost-nonexistent profit margins at the gas pump (even as they post >> record billion-dollar quarterly profits...) and the government carries >> on making periodic lackadaisical "investigations" into gas prices, >> never finding any evidence of funny business. > Ever notice how when the investigations start, prices drop like a rock > for a while. And then when the investigation is dropped, we are back to > (pre-investigation) prices within a week or two? ....and, the *instant* the price of a barrel of crude goes up by five cents, gas prices zoom skyward. "We have to cover our raw-material costs", is the explanation. When crude prices drop by four bucks a barrel, gas prices remain high. "We can't lower prices until we've sold off all the gasoline made with higher-priced raw materials", is the explanation. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Gas station economics lesson
> When premium unleaded became available in Toronto, back in the '80s, > premium was 1 or 2 cents/litre more. Gas prices were around 40-50 > cents/litre for regular, as I recall. (I recall one small independent > station in Kingston which charged the same price for regular or > premium. Back in the '80's I owned one of them Hyundia Pony's, It cost $14.00 (canadian) to fill er up and that would last nearly 500 km's. The unleaded gas I bought was around .44 - 49 cents per litre out in the "country", now those same country gas stations are in new urban areas.. The regular gas of the day (still had leaded) cost about 38 cents/litre. > The gas station may or may not be making a profit selling premium for > 20 cents off. I bet they would lose a lot of money selling regular for > 20 cents off. I have seen that a few times, were the station runs out (out= really low since the tank design prevents them from being pumped dry) of regular fuel and offers the mid grade fuel for the same price, since the mark up between reguklar and midgrade is very small and the mark up on regular to begin with is about 20-28% the station will still make its profit on the volume of fuel they sell, the larger the tank being filled the more profit for the station. Seeing how many stations get a discount for large volume buys, the closer their tanks are to empty when the tanker comes the cheaper they (the stations) get the fuel for. > Conclusion: the fat profits come from those folks who prefer, or are > required, to use premium gasoline. (And the ones who buy "special > deals" of pop and a candy bar for $2.22....) Don't forget the 6 pack of water for $10 or the $5 bundle of firewood. as well as the $4 litre of oil. Snow |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Gas station economics lesson
Brent P wrote:
> In article ch.edu>, > Daniel J. Stern wrote: [multipart MIME messages] > > Ummm...that's odd, because I'm using a mailreader (PINE) that's about as > > far from an HTML-generator as it's possible to get. > Your posts are often coming up in MIME and a bit munged by it I've noticed that when Daniel attempts to quote one of the extended ascii characters in messages like: ¢ ± ² ³. I don't know if PINE has the option of sending messages with raw 8-bit characters without having to resort to 'quoted printable' MIME encoding. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Gas station economics lesson
In article ich.edu>, Daniel J. Stern wrote:
> ...and, the *instant* the price of a barrel of crude goes up by five > cents, gas prices zoom skyward. "We have to cover our raw-material costs", > is the explanation. When crude prices drop by four bucks a barrel, gas > prices remain high. "We can't lower prices until we've sold off all the > gasoline made with higher-priced raw materials", is the explanation. What I would like to know is what it actually costs these oil companies per bbl. I doubt it's the actual "market" price since they will have agreements or own the oil fields. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
BUSH IS HELPING THE OIL CARTELS GETTING RICHER | Rudiallo | Driving | 63 | November 7th 05 07:54 PM |
Station Wagon Recommendations Needed | crazyjeff | Driving | 1 | April 6th 05 03:04 AM |
Subaru station wagon beats most BMW's?! | Ted Johnson | BMW | 21 | October 26th 04 02:42 PM |
AVOID SMOG CHECK at Ocean Ave 76 station in San Francisco, California, SMOG check in SF, CA | Me | General | 0 | May 18th 04 06:04 AM |