If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#171
|
|||
|
|||
"Harry K" > wrote in message
oups.com... > > Jim Yanik wrote: >> At first you were saying FIVE mph.Now you've changed it to 10 mph. > > You want to go back and show where I ever said 5mph?? It was I who said 5 mph, not Harry. |
Ads |
#172
|
|||
|
|||
Jim Yanik wrote:
> Even if they are driving the speed limit, they can be LLB's. > Driving the speed limit does not entitle one to block the passing lane. Exactly. And what we need are large signs posted periodically along with the speed limit signs, and LE officers willing to write tickets for it. Yeah, that will happen! -- Cheers, Bev -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- "I love to go down to the schoolyard and watch all the little children jump up and down and run around yelling and screaming...They don't know I'm only using blanks." --Emo |
#173
|
|||
|
|||
Scott en Aztlán > wrote in
: > On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:37:04 GMT, DYM > wrote: > >>>>The easiest way to do that without having to wait >>>>for a long time is to either match or exceed the speed of the vehicle >>>>behind you. Then, after completing your pass, slow down to your >>>>previous cruising speed. >>> >>> As simple as this is to do, there are people out there who flat out >>> refuse to touch their gas pedal. They set their cruise control and >>> that's it. I don't understand what the objection is, but it's obvious >>> that it exists. >> >>Maybe they don't want to exceed the speed limit? > > I saw an old geezer in a Mercedes once set his cruise control at 70MPH > in a 75 MPH speed zone; when the speed limit dropped to 65 MPH, the > oblivious old cuss was still going 70 MPH. > And?... You asked a question, and posted a possible reason. I get a very hostal vibe from you, Scott. I'll stay out of your way, but you gotta meet me half way and stay out of mine. DYM |
#174
|
|||
|
|||
"Harry K" > wrote in
oups.com: > > Jim Yanik wrote: >> "Harry K" > wrote in >> ups.com: >> >> > >> ><more snippo> >> > >> >> > Huh?? YOU claim STKR applies while I am pssing. Up up to YOU to >> >> > provide the cite if you need one. >> >> > >> >> > Harry K >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> copied from above text; >> >> >> >> HK; >> >> STKR does not >> >> apply while I am passing >> >> > >> >> >> JY; >> >> SAYS WHO? It applies ALL the time. >> >> Let's see a cite on that. >> >> >> >> So,YOU made the assertion that it does not apply while you are >> > passing,so >> >> YOU need to provide a cite to support it. >> >> >> >> sloth passing is just another form of LLBing. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Jim Yanik >> >> jyanik >> >> at >> >> kua.net >> > >> > Jim, you are getting too desperate to continue this. Nice twist, > you >> > insist STKR applies. Using your logic, persons in the right lane > can >> > never >> >> "never"??? >> >> > pass and Since when is passing with a 10mph differential 'sloth >> > passing'? >> >> At first you were saying FIVE mph.Now you've changed it to 10 mph. > > You want to go back and show where I ever said 5mph?? > > Answer the question > > Harry K > AGAIN; You still need to provide that cite to support your own statement; "STKR does not apply while I am passing". You can't,because it is NOT TRUE. -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
#175
|
|||
|
|||
Jim Yanik wrote: > "Harry K" > wrote in > oups.com: > > > > > Jim Yanik wrote: > >> "Harry K" > wrote in > >> ups.com: > >> > >> > > >> ><more snippo> > >> > > >> >> > Huh?? YOU claim STKR applies while I am pssing. Up up to YOU to > >> >> > provide the cite if you need one. > >> >> > > >> >> > Harry K > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> copied from above text; > >> >> > >> >> HK; > >> >> STKR does not > >> >> apply while I am passing > >> >> > >> > >> >> JY; > >> >> SAYS WHO? It applies ALL the time. > >> >> Let's see a cite on that. > >> >> > >> >> So,YOU made the assertion that it does not apply while you are > >> > passing,so > >> >> YOU need to provide a cite to support it. > >> >> > >> >> sloth passing is just another form of LLBing. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Jim Yanik > >> >> jyanik > >> >> at > >> >> kua.net > >> > > >> > Jim, you are getting too desperate to continue this. Nice twist, > > you > >> > insist STKR applies. Using your logic, persons in the right lane > > can > >> > never > >> > >> "never"??? > >> > >> > pass and Since when is passing with a 10mph differential 'sloth > >> > passing'? > >> > >> At first you were saying FIVE mph.Now you've changed it to 10 mph. > > > > You want to go back and show where I ever said 5mph?? > > > > Answer the question > > > > Harry K > > > > > AGAIN; > You still need to provide that cite to support your own statement; > "STKR does not apply while I am passing". > > You can't,because it is NOT TRUE. > > > -- > Jim Yanik > jyanik > at > kua.net Not man enough to admit you made a mistake eh?? Harry K |
#176
|
|||
|
|||
"Harry K" > wrote in
oups.com: > > Jim Yanik wrote: >> "Harry K" > wrote in >> oups.com: >> >> > >> > Jim Yanik wrote: >> >> "Harry K" > wrote in >> >> ups.com: >> >> >> >> > >> >> ><more snippo> >> >> > >> >> >> > Huh?? YOU claim STKR applies while I am pssing. Up up to YOU > to >> >> >> > provide the cite if you need one. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Harry K >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> copied from above text; >> >> >> >> >> >> HK; >> >> >> STKR does not >> >> >> apply while I am passing >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> JY; >> >> >> SAYS WHO? It applies ALL the time. >> >> >> Let's see a cite on that. >> >> >> >> >> >> So,YOU made the assertion that it does not apply while you are >> >> > passing,so >> >> >> YOU need to provide a cite to support it. >> >> >> >> >> >> sloth passing is just another form of LLBing. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Jim Yanik >> >> >> jyanik >> >> >> at >> >> >> kua.net >> >> > >> >> > Jim, you are getting too desperate to continue this. Nice twist, >> > you >> >> > insist STKR applies. Using your logic, persons in the right > lane >> > can >> >> > never >> >> >> >> "never"??? >> >> >> >> > pass and Since when is passing with a 10mph differential 'sloth >> >> > passing'? >> >> >> >> At first you were saying FIVE mph.Now you've changed it to 10 mph. >> > >> > You want to go back and show where I ever said 5mph?? >> > >> > Answer the question >> > >> > Harry K >> > >> >> >> AGAIN; >> You still need to provide that cite to support your own statement; >> "STKR does not apply while I am passing". >> >> You can't,because it is NOT TRUE. >> >> >> -- >> Jim Yanik >> jyanik >> at >> kua.net > > Not man enough to admit you made a mistake eh?? > > Harry K > > Lets see your cite,Harry;back up your assertion. That's the REAL question here. -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
#177
|
|||
|
|||
"Jim Yanik" .> wrote in message .. . > "Harry K" > wrote in > oups.com: >> Not man enough to admit you made a mistake eh?? >> >> Harry K > Lets see your cite,Harry;back up your assertion. > That's the REAL question here. Here's the cite, Jim: it was in one of my own posts that I mentioned passing at 5 mph, not Harry. It was me. So by saying Harry wrote that, you made a mistake. |
#178
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bill wrote:
> See, here's a great example of what I'm saying. > You obviously haven't read what you yourself wrote. > You said "such as", which does not limit actions to your above > examples. Neither Scott nor Nate had a problem properly interpreting the sentence I wrote. Why are you having a problem? I wrote the sentence, and I certainly am in a position to clarify its meaning. Here's a clarification for you. Any action that requires you to yield to other traffic before making a maneuver fits the criteria of a maneuver you should not undertake unless it will not affect the speed and direction of other traffic that could possibly interact with you. This does not apply to traffic behind you in the same lane that have to slow down if you yourself are yielding. |
#179
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bill wrote:
> Maybe I haver a problem understanding what yiou mean because I read > what you wrote. The fact is that 2 people had no problem understanding what I wrote the first time and required no further clarification. You, OTOH, continue to purposefully sidetrack the discussion due to your inability to understand what I actually meant even after multiple clarifications. Either you're doing it on purpose as a form of entertainment, or you're mentally handicapped. |
#180
|
|||
|
|||
Skip Elliott Bowman wrote:
> "Arif Khokar" > wrote: >>>But maybe conditions don't allow me to pass faster than 5 mph; conditions >>>that may include but not be limited to that speed trap 1/4 ahead that I >>>know about and you don't. >>If I knew about a speed trap Ľ mile ahead, I'd just remain in the right >>lane. > Arif, did you notice the last three words of my post up there? Skip, did you notice the first eleven words of your post up there? IOW, if I know there's a speed trap up ahead, I don't initiate a pass. On a similar note, if I'm in the right lane behind someone going 60 mph, I don't initiate a pass if the left lane is covered in 3 inches of snow/slush. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Left lane blocking illegal in Wyoming effective July 1 | John F. Carr | Driving | 14 | March 17th 05 10:30 PM |
legal question about left lane use by malfunctioning auto | Richard | Driving | 4 | February 20th 05 04:54 PM |
*** Fighting a minor ticket ( Making left turn from center lane AZ) | abbygale | Driving | 8 | February 4th 05 10:41 PM |
Left lane slow pokes now illegal in Illinois! | Diode | Corvette | 60 | September 21st 04 12:26 PM |