If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is this consistent with a failing coolant temperature sensor?
My car has an analog temperature gauge. The reading is below 100F when
the engine is cold, then climbs as I drive, but doesn't go much above 160F. Bad thermostat? But I have a receipt from the previous owner for thermostat replacement five months ago. I just got the car. Is the behavior of the gauge as I describe it above consistent with a failing coolant temperature sensor?---namely that it works partially but is inaccurate---reads 35 degrees F lower than the actual temp or tops out at 160F? I am seeing other symptoms that seem to be consistent with a too-cool engine though. 1995 Park Avenue Ultra 3800 supercharged V6 |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is this consistent with a failing coolant temperature sensor?
In article >,
Matt > wrote: > My car has an analog temperature gauge. The reading is below 100F when > the engine is cold, then climbs as I drive, but doesn't go much above > 160F. > > Bad thermostat? But I have a receipt from the previous owner for > thermostat replacement five months ago. I just got the car. > > Is the behavior of the gauge as I describe it above consistent with a > failing coolant temperature sensor?---namely that it works partially but > is inaccurate---reads 35 degrees F lower than the actual temp or tops > out at 160F? > > I am seeing other symptoms that seem to be consistent with a too-cool > engine though. > > 1995 Park Avenue Ultra > 3800 supercharged V6 I bet the past owner put in a 160°F thermostat. It's probably supposed to be a 192°F. A quick IR thermometer reading off the thermostat housing (once the engine is fully warm) will tell the story... the receipt from the past owner may even have info on the thermostat installed. The computer will never go closed loop running that cold... Erik |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Is this consistent with a failing coolant temperature sensor?
Matt > wrote:
>My car has an analog temperature gauge. The reading is below 100F when >the engine is cold, then climbs as I drive, but doesn't go much above >160F. > >Bad thermostat? But I have a receipt from the previous owner for >thermostat replacement five months ago. I just got the car. Maybe. Maybe they used a cheap one that broke open. Maybe they used the wrong one, that is set for too low a tempeature. The first thing I would do is to measure the temperature at the radiator and compare it to what the shop manual says it should be. The second thing I would do would be to get a known-good thermostat (NOT a cheapie from a chain store) and replace it. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Is this consistent with a failing coolant temperature sensor?
Erik wrote:
> In article >, > Matt > wrote: > >> My car has an analog temperature gauge. The reading is below 100F when >> the engine is cold, then climbs as I drive, but doesn't go much above >> 160F. >> >> Bad thermostat? But I have a receipt from the previous owner for >> thermostat replacement five months ago. I just got the car. >> >> Is the behavior of the gauge as I describe it above consistent with a >> failing coolant temperature sensor?---namely that it works partially but >> is inaccurate---reads 35 degrees F lower than the actual temp or tops >> out at 160F? >> >> I am seeing other symptoms that seem to be consistent with a too-cool >> engine though. >> >> 1995 Park Avenue Ultra >> 3800 supercharged V6 > > I bet the past owner put in a 160°F thermostat. It's probably supposed > to be a 192°F. I was thinking that myself. But the past owner was not a technical guy, and 160 F seems rather extreme. When I look for thermostats for my make and model at advanceautoparts.com, they offer only 180 F and 195 F. The owner's manual lists 195 F for the stock thermostat. Maybe the shop (Car-X) had a 160 F thermostat laying around and didn't notice or just wanted to get rid of it. Or would there be some reason to put in such a cool one? The repair was done in Minnesota. The problem was that the heater wasn't working. Could the choice of 160 F be related to the coolant leaks that this engine is prone to? There was a class action settlement lately for that problem. Maybe they promote cool thermostats so the customer's engine will be cool sooner when they need to work on it so they can get you in and out sooner. > A quick IR thermometer reading off the thermostat housing (once the > engine is fully warm) will tell the story... Aha. Maybe I'll drop by some service station and ask them to check it. I would buy an IR thermometer if they're $20. > the receipt from the past > owner may even have info on the thermostat installed. no > The computer will never go closed loop running that cold... I don't know which loop you mean. Explain? The other running-too-cool symptoms I hinted at we 1) the oil looks brown and not too clear, even though it was changed only about 300 miles ago, and 2) the oil level is about 2/3 qt. too high on the dipstick. I expect most of the high level is simply from overfilling, but could the oil pick up that much blow-by in 300 miles at 160 F? Maybe I should check the PCV valve too? My impulse is to put in a stock (195 F) thermostat, but if there is a reason to go with 180 F instead, I would be happy to listen. I don't know much of the pros and cons about using a non-stock thermostat. The car has 160K miles in case that matters. > > Erik |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Is this consistent with a failing coolant temperature sensor?
Matt wrote: > > > The computer will never go closed loop running that cold... > > I don't know which loop you mean. Explain? > The computer relies on the info from the coolant temperature sensor. That is different from the sending unit for the dash gauge. Does the coolant fan come on in stop and go traffic on a hot day? If it does that would be a good indication your gauge is off. > The other running-too-cool symptoms I hinted at we > > 1) the oil looks brown and not too clear, even though it was changed > only about 300 miles ago, and This could be related to the engine not being hot enough but it is much more likely you need to change the oil a little more frequently to get rid of accumulated grime that is probably simply due to not changing the oil often. After a couple of frequent changes it will probably not get dirty so fast. > > 2) the oil level is about 2/3 qt. too high on the dipstick. > > I expect most of the high level is simply from overfilling, but could > the oil pick up that much blow-by in 300 miles at 160 F? Maybe I should > check the PCV valve too? If the oil is overfilled and stays overfilled I don't understand how you conclude that means there is excess blow-by? Checking the PCV and the hose is certainly worth doing. Is the oil milky brown or just brown? The oil will pick up whatever excess grime is inside the engine. In theory the oil keeps the grime suspended and gets eliminated with an oil change, but if you don't change the oil often enough then it will start to deposit the grime inside the engine and that can be why fresh oil gets dirty fast. > > My impulse is to put in a stock (195 F) thermostat, but if there is a > reason to go with 180 F instead, I would be happy to listen. I don't > know much of the pros and cons about using a non-stock thermostat. The > car has 160K miles in case that matters. If the reason the t-stat was replaced was to get the heater working it probably already is 195° t-stat. If that is the case, that would suggest the temp gauge just reads low. If your cooling fan comes on, it is unlikely that it is running too cold. Get the temperature checked. If the temperature gauge is not reading accurately I wouldn't worry too much. It should still do it's job. It will tell you how long it takes to warm up and if the engine starts to overheat you should see the needle move upwards. -jim > > > > > Erik ----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Is this consistent with a failing coolant temperature sensor?
jim wrote:
> > Matt wrote: >> 2) the oil level is about 2/3 qt. too high on the dipstick. >> >> I expect most of the high level is simply from overfilling, but could >> the oil pick up that much blow-by in 300 miles at 160 F? Maybe I should >> check the PCV valve too? > > If the oil is overfilled and stays overfilled I don't understand how you > conclude that means there is excess blow-by? I wasn't clear. I mean maybe the full condition is all or partly due to blow-by condensing in the oil rather than being overfilled at the last oil change. Could the oil level rise 2/3 qt in 300 miles assuming 160 F t-stat and a PCV problem? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Is this consistent with a failing coolant temperature sensor?
Matt wrote:
> jim wrote: >> >> Matt wrote: > >>> 2) the oil level is about 2/3 qt. too high on the dipstick. >>> >>> I expect most of the high level is simply from overfilling, but could >>> the oil pick up that much blow-by in 300 miles at 160 F? Maybe I should >>> check the PCV valve too? >> >> If the oil is overfilled and stays overfilled I don't understand how >> you >> conclude that means there is excess blow-by? > > > I wasn't clear. I mean maybe the full condition is all or partly due to > blow-by condensing in the oil rather than being overfilled at the last > oil change. Could the oil level rise 2/3 qt in 300 miles assuming 160 F > t-stat and a PCV problem? I'll try again. Could the overfull condition be all or partly due to blow-by condensing in the oil rather than due to being overfilled at the last oil change? Could the oil level rise 2/3 qt in 300 miles assuming 160 F t-stat and a PCV problem? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Is this consistent with a failing coolant temperature sensor?
jim wrote:
> > Matt wrote: > >>> The computer will never go closed loop running that cold... >> I don't know which loop you mean. Explain? >> > > The computer relies on the info from the coolant temperature sensor. That is > different from the sending unit for the dash gauge. That is surprising---not that I would know. In the intake manifold I found two devices other than the injectors. One is toward the rear of the car, (on the side with the even-numbered bank of cylinders). When I unplug it, the gauge stops working. The other is on the end of the manifold beneath the throttle body. When I unplug that one, the gauge is unaffected. Your post seems to imply that that one gives input to the computer. Which one controls the warning light? I'm thinking that if one sending unit is bad, maybe the other is too. Mileage is 160K. Maybe I should get somebody to hook the car to a computer for general diagnostics. Presumably a bad temperature-sending unit would be detectable. Should I go to the GM dealer for the diagnostic---or would a large repair shop have the right equipment? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Is this consistent with a failing coolant temperature sensor?
On Jul 2, 12:23*pm, Matt > wrote:
> Erik wrote: > > In article >, > > *Matt > wrote: > > >> My car has an analog temperature gauge. *The reading is below 100F when > >> the engine is cold, then climbs as I drive, but doesn't go much above > >> 160F. > > >> Bad thermostat? *But I have a receipt from the previous owner for > >> thermostat replacement five months ago. *I just got the car. > > >> Is the behavior of the gauge as I describe it above consistent with a > >> failing coolant temperature sensor?---namely that it works partially but > >> is inaccurate---reads 35 degrees F lower than the actual temp or tops > >> out at 160F? > > >> I am seeing other symptoms that seem to be consistent with a too-cool > >> engine though. > > >> 1995 Park Avenue Ultra > >> 3800 supercharged V6 > > > I bet the past owner put in a 160°F thermostat. It's probably supposed > > to be a 192°F. > > I was thinking that myself. *But the past owner was not a technical guy, > and 160 F seems rather extreme. *When I look for thermostats for my make > and model at advanceautoparts.com, they offer only 180 F and 195 F. *The > owner's manual lists 195 F for the stock thermostat. > > Maybe the shop (Car-X) had a 160 F thermostat laying around and didn't > notice or just wanted to get rid of it. *Or would there be some reason > to put in such a cool one? *The repair was done in Minnesota. *The > problem was that the heater wasn't working. *Could the choice of 160 F > be related to the coolant leaks that this engine is prone to? *There was > a class action settlement lately for that problem. *Maybe they promote > cool thermostats so the customer's engine will be cool sooner when they > need to work on it so they can get you in and out sooner. > > > A quick IR thermometer reading off the thermostat housing (once the > > engine is fully warm) will tell the story... > > Aha. *Maybe I'll drop by some service station and ask them to check it. > * I would buy an IR thermometer if they're $20. > is $30 too much? http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000FJR0SG it's a cool tool, I was just looking for mine this past weekend (trying to calibrate temp gauge on my '55 Stude) nate |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to remove a coolant temperature sensor on a 98 corolla? | mdmtber | Technology | 2 | August 23rd 06 07:17 PM |
How to remove a coolant temperature sensor on a 98 corolla? | mdmtber | Technology | 0 | August 23rd 06 05:31 PM |
Coolant Temperature Sensor location | stinknugget | Saturn | 5 | November 1st 05 07:34 PM |
Coolant temperature sensor on 95 town and country | Pdigmking | Chrysler | 2 | July 23rd 05 05:53 PM |
Marquis Engine Coolant Temperature Sensor | Harpo | Technology | 0 | April 27th 05 07:30 PM |