Running to rich please help!

Hello everybody,

I have a Explrer 2000 that I haved checked with
my OB2 scanner it's say that is running to rich, can enybody tell me what is
the problem and where to look ti fix it? I will appreciate all the help.

"Jay Cotty" <u24752@uwe> wrote

> Hello everybody,
>
> I have a Explrer 2000 that I haved checked with
> my OB2 scanner it's say that is running to rich,
> can enybody tell me what is the problem and
> where to look ti fix it? I will appreciate all the help.

My scanner says your proof-reading adjustment
is set too low.

CWLee wrote:
>"Jay Cotty" <u24752@uwe> wrote
>
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> I have a Explrer 2000 that I haved checked with
>> my OB2 scanner it's say that is running to rich,
>> can enybody tell me what is the problem and
>> where to look ti fix it? I will appreciate all the help.
>
>My scanner says your proof-reading adjustment
>is set too low.

Hi CWLee, whayt you mean with that? I can't get it.

--
My Best Regards,
Jay Cotty*
Catch me if you can!

"Jay Cotty" <u24752@uwe> wrote:

> Hi CWLee, whayt you mean with that? I can't get it.

I was trying to suggest, with humor, that your original
posting would have been understood better, and that
it have would have triggered more responsive replies,
if you had proofread it first, and corrected all the errors.

For example,

if you had said "Explorer" instead of "Explrer",
if you had said "have" instead of "haved",
if you had inserted a period after "scanner" and
then started a new sentence, saying "It says ... "
instead of "it's say ... ",
if you had written "... that it is running too rich.",
instead of "... that is running to rich,"
If you had then started another sentence
with "Can anybody tell me what the problem is ... "
instead of "can enybody tell me what is the problem ...
"

I'll leave the rest of your original post for you to
inspect for similar possibilities.

Remember, the way you express yourself does
cause others to form opinions of your education,
intelligence, attention to detail, and other things
about you.

I'm sure what I have said tells you something about me.

=======================


> CWLee wrote:
> >"Jay Cotty" <u24752@uwe> wrote
> >
> >> Hello everybody,
> >>
> >> I have a Explrer 2000 that I haved checked with
> >> my OB2 scanner it's say that is running to rich,
> >> can enybody tell me what is the problem and
> >> where to look ti fix it? I will appreciate all the
help.
> >
> >My scanner says your proof-reading adjustment
> >is set too low.
>
> Hi CWLee, whayt you mean with that? I can't get it.
>
> --
> My Best Regards,
> Jay Cotty*
> Catch me if you can!
>

In addition to what CWL has stated... post the code you have retrieved, any
symptoms or running concerns you have and any other pertinent
information.... Mixture codes are generally symptomatic rather than
causal... some logical diagnostic steps are required to avoid un-needed
expense.

FWIW.... the number of concerns that will deliver a "lean" code are many....
there are relatively few that will deliver a rich code..... None the less,
if you want help, post the exact code retrieved...

If it was this easy, I'd be on welfare....


"Jay Cotty" <u24752@uwe> wrote in message news:6418b11dfd6c4@uwe...
> Hello everybody,
>
> I have a Explrer 2000 that I haved checked
> with
> my OB2 scanner it's say that is running to rich, can enybody tell me what
> is
> the problem and where to look ti fix it? I will appreciate all the help.
>

Ooops! LOL,LOL, you are something else CW, anyway, thanks for your good humor,
but, when you start to have a couple beers! well, I guess you know the rest.

For you Jim, the codes are P0172 (Bank 1) and P0175 (Bank 2) if you know
where can I start, I will appreciate all the help that I can get from you
guys, BTW I'm new here and I like all the info. and most, the sence of humor.
;-)

CWLee wrote:
>> Hi CWLee, whayt you mean with that? I can't get it.
>
>I was trying to suggest, with humor, that your original
>posting would have been understood better, and that
>it have would have triggered more responsive replies,
>if you had proofread it first, and corrected all the errors.
>
>For example,
>
>if you had said "Explorer" instead of "Explrer",
>if you had said "have" instead of "haved",
>if you had inserted a period after "scanner" and
> then started a new sentence, saying "It says ... "
> instead of "it's say ... ",
>if you had written "... that it is running too rich.",
> instead of "... that is running to rich,"
>If you had then started another sentence
> with "Can anybody tell me what the problem is ... "
> instead of "can enybody tell me what is the problem ...
>"
>
>I'll leave the rest of your original post for you to
>inspect for similar possibilities.
>
>Remember, the way you express yourself does
>cause others to form opinions of your education,
>intelligence, attention to detail, and other things
>about you.
>
>I'm sure what I have said tells you something about me.
>
>=======================
>
>> >> Hello everybody,
>> >>
>[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>
>> Hi CWLee, whayt you mean with that? I can't get it.

--
Message posted via http://www.carkb.com