If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Best MPG : 5-speed vs. auto?
« Paul » <"« Paul > wrote in article >... > SQ wrote: > > > > Assuming an identical car, let's say a 4-cyl Honda or a Subaru or > > Toyota, which would > > get better MPG -- one with automatic tranny or 5-speed? > > > > I understand that 5 speeds vs. 4 gives a better selection of rpms, > > meaning at the same speed you can cruise with lower rpms, assuming the > > same rear axle ratio. > > > > Also I understand that 5-speeds don't have a torque converter that > > autos have which robbs some power. > > > > But in my experience, in city driving, it's hard to shift well for good > > MPG. Maybe I am shifting at wrong rpms, I am not sure. > > Automatics will always have some loss due to the torque convertor. The use of lock-up torque converters has eliminated that situation. When the converter is locked, you have a direct mechanical connection between the engine crankshaft and the driveshaft - just as with a manual tranny. Computer-controlled transmissions can now shift gears at exactly the correct moment...... If it is fuel mileage I'm looking for, I'll take an automatic over a stick. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Best MPG : 5-speed vs. auto?
SQ wrote:
> Assuming an identical car, let's say a 4-cyl Honda or a Subaru or > Toyota, which would > get better MPG -- one with automatic tranny or 5-speed? > > I understand that 5 speeds vs. 4 gives a better selection of rpms, > meaning at the same speed you can cruise with lower rpms, assuming the > same rear axle ratio. > > Also I understand that 5-speeds don't have a torque converter that > autos have which robbs some power. > > But in my experience, in city driving, it's hard to shift well for good > MPG. Maybe I am shifting at wrong rpms, I am not sure. > Not hard at all. Forget what they said in olden days about not lugging the engine. Shift early- if the car WON'T accelerate, then you shifted too soon. But if it accelerates smoothly, even though leisurely, that is fine. Even though my Neon R/T has a fairly agressive camshaft(s), I can shift below 2K, and it will be smooth with no shudder, though it is a leisurely acceleration. Also, when you see a light ahead, shift into neutral and coast. Yeah, it is illegal in many states, but those laws were written when brakes were primitive and gas was a quarter a gallon. There was a study in the late seventies by a European mfg. I think it was VW. They ran two cars on test trac for 100K miles, or some long distance. They lugged one car, drove other without lugging them. When they tore them down to look at crank, no discernable difference. I wish I could remember the mag I read about this test in, but I cannot (it was about 1980). Anyway, it altered my driving habits. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Best MPG : 5-speed vs. auto?
« Paul » wrote:
> SQ wrote: > >>Well, this explains a lot. I have been driving a 5-speed and have been >>getting awful mpg in city. Now I am realizing I am shifting at very >>high rpms, around 2500. I will try to lower the rpms during shifting >>and see if it makes any difference. >> >>(I think one problem in my particular situation is that the type of >>engine I have derives it's power from high rpms, you have to rev it to >>get going, and I don't like it) > > > Small overhead cam engines are like that. Especially ones with lots of valves per > cylinder. They develop max hp and torque near max rpm. But you don't NEED that much hp to drive it. One can take off with fair throttle, as soon as you are moving, begin shifting. Short shift. You will not be the leader of the pack, but you can save gas. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Best MPG : 5-speed vs. auto?
* wrote:
> > Computer-controlled transmissions can now shift gears at exactly the > correct moment...... > > If it is fuel mileage I'm looking for, I'll take an automatic over a stick. > > > No way! We traded in a Voyager stick for a new Chrysler van. The auto in the new one shifts at WAY higher rpm than we did with the old one, and we get nowhere the milage. You can short shift a stick- newer ones with computer control, you can't even FORCE an upshift! And the computer wants to supply AVERAGE driving program. If I knew how to redo programming I would. Anyone know if the dealer shop can alter the shift point? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Best MPG : 5-speed vs. auto?
Don Stauffer wrote:
> Also, when you see a light ahead, shift into > neutral and coast. Yeah, it is illegal in many states, but those laws > were written when brakes were primitive and gas was a quarter a gallon. > I just don't get idiots that come onto a world wide web boasting about doing highly illegal and deadly practices while saying 'forget what they used to say', it's cool now to go out of control and potentially kill yourself or others.... Mike |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Best MPG : 5-speed vs. auto?
* wrote:
> > « Paul » <"« Paul > wrote in article > >... > > SQ wrote: > > > > > > Assuming an identical car, let's say a 4-cyl Honda or a Subaru or > > > Toyota, which would > > > get better MPG -- one with automatic tranny or 5-speed? > > > > > > I understand that 5 speeds vs. 4 gives a better selection of rpms, > > > meaning at the same speed you can cruise with lower rpms, assuming the > > > same rear axle ratio. > > > > > > Also I understand that 5-speeds don't have a torque converter that > > > autos have which robbs some power. > > > > > > But in my experience, in city driving, it's hard to shift well for good > > > MPG. Maybe I am shifting at wrong rpms, I am not sure. > > > > Automatics will always have some loss due to the torque convertor. > > The use of lock-up torque converters has eliminated that situation. > > When the converter is locked, you have a direct mechanical connection > between the engine crankshaft and the driveshaft - just as with a manual > tranny. > > Computer-controlled transmissions can now shift gears at exactly the > correct moment...... > > If it is fuel mileage I'm looking for, I'll take an automatic over a stick. A TC locks up at a certain speed (~38 mph) in high gear. Typical city driving rarely lets you get above that speed. I think the original poster was talking about city driving (read his post#2). |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Best MPG : 5-speed vs. auto?
SQ wrote: > Assuming an identical car, let's say a 4-cyl Honda or a Subaru or > Toyota, which would > get better MPG -- one with automatic tranny or 5-speed? > > I understand that 5 speeds vs. 4 gives a better selection of rpms, > meaning at the same speed you can cruise with lower rpms, assuming the > same rear axle ratio. > > Also I understand that 5-speeds don't have a torque converter that > autos have which robbs some power. > > But in my experience, in city driving, it's hard to shift well for good > MPG. Maybe I am shifting at wrong rpms, I am not sure. Two big unknowns prevent making a flat statement: Does the driver know how to drive a stick shift to maximize milage. Is the test in town or on the road. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Best MPG : 5-speed vs. auto?
"Don Stauffer" > wrote in message ... > * wrote: > > > > Computer-controlled transmissions can now shift gears at exactly the > > correct moment...... > > > > If it is fuel mileage I'm looking for, I'll take an automatic over a stick. > > > > > > > > No way! We traded in a Voyager stick for a new Chrysler van. The auto > in the new one shifts at WAY higher rpm than we did with the old one, > and we get nowhere the milage. You can short shift a stick- newer ones > with computer control, you can't even FORCE an upshift! And the > computer wants to supply AVERAGE driving program. If I knew how to redo > programming I would. > > Anyone know if the dealer shop can alter the shift point? Most Chrysler minivan sticks were on the short wheelbase 2.5L you have a 3.8L in a long wheelbase there now that weighs a hell of a lot more. If you had a stick on there you would get even worse mileage. Ted |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Best MPG : 5-speed vs. auto?
"Mike Romain" > wrote in message ... > Don Stauffer wrote: > > > Also, when you see a light ahead, shift into > > neutral and coast. Yeah, it is illegal in many states, but those laws > > were written when brakes were primitive and gas was a quarter a gallon. > > > > I just don't get idiots that come onto a world wide web boasting about > doing highly illegal and deadly practices while saying 'forget what they > used to say', it's cool now to go out of control and potentially kill > yourself or others.... > I didn't realize that when you shifted into neutral that your brakes stopped working. I'll cite another ancedotal study I can't find right now, they did a study of accidents, out of the 200+ or so they found only 5 where the driver would have been better off accellerating in an attempt to avoid a collision. All others it made no difference or the driver would have been a lot better off braking harder. The idea that you lose control in neutral is baloney. You still have steering and brakes, and in most collisions I've seen there was plenty of room for the drivers to swerve to avoid. They call it taking evasive action. The problem is that most drivers in the few seconds before a collision happens, freeze up and do not steer away from the impending collision, and as a result many collisions happen that wouldn't have happened at all had the driver swerved. Particularly in city driving when the car is seldom above 35Mph, the idea that your going to be able to downshift during a deaccelleration from 35Mph to 0Mph, and be able to suddenly power out of the way of an impending collision, is poppycock. The engine is not going to be in the right gear to be able to punch it and power out of a collision. Ted |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Best MPG : 5-speed vs. auto?
Don Stauffer wrote:
> SQ wrote: > >> Assuming an identical car, let's say a 4-cyl Honda or a Subaru or >> Toyota, which would >> get better MPG -- one with automatic tranny or 5-speed? >> >> I understand that 5 speeds vs. 4 gives a better selection of rpms, >> meaning at the same speed you can cruise with lower rpms, assuming the >> same rear axle ratio. >> >> Also I understand that 5-speeds don't have a torque converter that >> autos have which robbs some power. >> >> But in my experience, in city driving, it's hard to shift well for good >> MPG. Maybe I am shifting at wrong rpms, I am not sure. >> > > > Not hard at all. Forget what they said in olden days about not lugging > the engine. Shift early- if the car WON'T accelerate, then you shifted > too soon. But if it accelerates smoothly, even though leisurely, that is > fine. Even though my Neon R/T has a fairly agressive camshaft(s), I can > shift below 2K, and it will be smooth with no shudder, though it is a > leisurely acceleration. Also, when you see a light ahead, shift into > neutral and coast. Yeah, it is illegal in many states, but those laws > were written when brakes were primitive and gas was a quarter a gallon. > > There was a study in the late seventies by a European mfg. I think it > was VW. They ran two cars on test trac for 100K miles, or some long > distance. They lugged one car, drove other without lugging them. When > they tore them down to look at crank, no discernable difference. I wish > I could remember the mag I read about this test in, but I cannot (it was > about 1980). Anyway, it altered my driving habits. I don't like that. 'lugging' the engine is what happens when you shift too soon. YOu need to shift soon enough to balance the acceleration you get after the shift with overdriving in the gear you are shifting from. Don't shift ASAP. That just waste gas. -- Thank you, "Then said I, Wisdom [is] better than strength: nevertheless the poor man's wisdom [is] despised, and his words are not heard." Ecclesiastes 9:16 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
It's not Speed, it's Not Stopping | SD Dave | Driving | 47 | April 4th 06 04:17 AM |
Do I need a transmission cooler on 3 speed auto? | Mike Patterson | Dodge | 1 | January 7th 06 12:44 AM |
IN senate backs bill to raise speed limit to 70 mph | 223rem | Driving | 56 | February 22nd 05 04:21 PM |
Where to get Official Speed Limit Info | [email protected] | Driving | 40 | January 3rd 05 07:10 AM |
Fleet Maintenance Pro v9.0.19 Enterprise 100 users, STRACfastMaintenance 2.5c, Auto Maintenance Pro v9.0 Professional Incl Keygen,various other AUTO and BOAT Maintenance progs ... | [email protected], [email protected] | Antique cars | 0 | October 23rd 03 09:08 PM |