If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
> wrote in message ... > If you are sitting at the light and dont turn on the red, someone is > going to ram the rear of your car. Just because you dont have a life > or a schedule. other people do. Someone is a big truck will ram you > and smash the rear end of your car like an accordian. If you cant > handle turning on a red, go to your local DOT office and surrender > your drivers license. You are not capable of driving. Hopefully you are not serious. How many people are on such tight schedules that waiting an extra 20 seconds at a light is going to ruin their life? Ramming someone at a red light because you are so rude and impatient that you can't wait a few extra seconds is going to end up delaying you even more while you wait for the police to come and investigate the accident. Not to mention the hit to your wallet. Impatience is not an excuse for being a jerk. Here is the NC Statute that authorizes "right on red." "Approaching with traffic signal traffic signal the approaching a. When a steady or strobe beam stoplight is emitting a red light controlling traffic passing through an intersection, an approaching vehicle facing the red light shall come to a stop and shall not enter the intersection. After coming to a complete stop and unless prohibited by an appropriate sign, that approaching vehicle may make a right turn. b. Any vehicle that turns right under this subdivision shall yield the right-of-way to: 1. Other traffic and pedestrians using the intersection; and 2. Pedestrians who are moving towards the intersection, who are in reasonably close proximity to the intersection, and who are preparing to cross in front of the traffic that is required to stop at the red light....." Notice the part about "may make a right turn." Also notice that you required to stop, and look, not slow down and pull out in front of any car or pedestrian that you can intimidate into not hitting your car. Ed |
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
"C. E. White" wrote:
> > > wrote in message > ... > > If you are sitting at the light and dont turn on the red, someone is > > going to ram the rear of your car. Just because you dont have a life > > or a schedule. other people do. Someone is a big truck will ram you > > and smash the rear end of your car like an accordian. If you cant > > handle turning on a red, go to your local DOT office and surrender > > your drivers license. You are not capable of driving. > > Hopefully you are not serious. How many people are on such tight schedules > that waiting an extra 20 seconds at a light is going to ruin their life? How many people is the sitter holding up? Multiply that by every time he has to turn right. While I wouldn't ram a jerk who sat there for three minutes of NO cross traffic waiting for the light to go green, I'd sure honk at him. As a bicyclist, I see a lot of this. Adding a bicycle to the equation seems to freak them out even more. I used to turn around and motion them to go ahead while I was waiting to go straight, but that gets old after a while. Right on red is legal in most states now. Anybody know where it still isn't? -- Cheers, Bev ---------------------------------------------- "Tough? We drink our urine and eat our dead!" -- N. Heilweil |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
"The Real Bev" > wrote in message ... > "C. E. White" wrote: >> Hopefully you are not serious. How many people are on such tight >> schedules >> that waiting an extra 20 seconds at a light is going to ruin their life? > > How many people is the sitter holding up? Multiply that by every time he > has > to turn right. While I wouldn't ram a jerk who sat there for three > minutes of > NO cross traffic waiting for the light to go green, I'd sure honk at him. Any light that doesn't change in less than 3 minutes with no opposing traffic needs to be retimed. I have been honked at while sitting at a light waiting to turn right when there is a sign clearly stating "No Right On Red." Then there are the people who honk at you when you are going straight at an intersection where they want to turn right. How many of these hypothetical people that the cautious person is holding up by not aggressively turning right on red can't spare 10 or 15 seconds from their not so busy day? I suppose you never had an aggressive driver turn right on red and almost hit you. Or turn right on red in front of you (failure to yield right of way) and then drive slowly, holding you up? > As a bicyclist, I see a lot of this. Adding a bicycle to the equation > seems > to freak them out even more. I used to turn around and motion them to go > ahead while I was waiting to go straight, but that gets old after a while. Sigh, I can't see you complaining about some little old lady not turning right on red if you are out there clogging up the roads with your bike. And don't give me the BS about how you outrun most traffic. Think about how many people slow down in reaction to your presence when you are on the bike and multiply that out. In the end you are just another impatient driver who is unwilling to tolerate even the slightest impediment to your drive, while at the same time not giving a damn how many people you cut off or slow down. Just be honest, it is all about you. > Right on red is legal in most states now. Anybody know where it still > isn't? According to http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/outr...1995/TT086.htm : "Since January 1, 1980, all 50 states and the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico have had laws permitting right-turn-on-red unless a sign prohibits the turn. As of January 1, 1994, 43 jurisdictions provided for left-turn-on-red (LTOR) and nine did not. LTOR is permitted only at the intersection of a one-way street with another one-way street." At least ROR rules aren't significantly contributing to the death rate. However, you might be interested in reading this reference since a large portion of the ROR accidents involve bicycles and pedestrians. Ed |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
223rem wrote: > Nate Nagel wrote: > > > In fact, more often than not, I see > > people turning directly into the right lane. Why, I dunno. > > Less cornering effort Not significantly, if you are doing it right. I actually think it's that people turn in/apex way too early, because nobody ever showed them the right way to take a corner. Which is scary in and of itself if you think about it... nate |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
"C. E. White" wrote:
> > "The Real Bev" > wrote in message > ... > > "C. E. White" wrote: > > >> Hopefully you are not serious. How many people are on such tight > >> schedules > >> that waiting an extra 20 seconds at a light is going to ruin their life? > > > > How many people is the sitter holding up? Multiply that by every time he > > has > > to turn right. While I wouldn't ram a jerk who sat there for three > > minutes of > > NO cross traffic waiting for the light to go green, I'd sure honk at him. > > Any light that doesn't change in less than 3 minutes with no opposing > traffic needs to be retimed. Two traffic lanes and a left-turn lane with signal in all four directions. It's safe to turn right in some modes, but not others. The cycle is 3 minutes -- possibly more. The sloths who just miss their turn always wait until their turn comes up three minutes later. The idiot city street people can't get the timing right no matter what they do, and trying just ****s it up worse. By design (or lack thereof) NO sensor will see a bicycle. > I have been honked at while sitting at a light waiting to turn right when > there is a sign clearly stating "No Right On Red." Then there are the people > who honk at you when you are going straight at an intersection where they > want to turn right. If they're in the wrong, smile and give them the finger. Or smile and wave, it's more annoying. The subject here is people who DON'T turn right when it's clearly their turn. We can generally recognize these people because their turn signals blink for the entire cycle. > How many of these hypothetical people that the cautious person is holding up > by not aggressively turning right on red can't spare 10 or 15 seconds from > their not so busy day? > > I suppose you never had an aggressive driver turn right on red and almost > hit you. Or turn right on red in front of you (failure to yield right of > way) and then drive slowly, holding you up? A REAL aggressive driver knows where he is and where you are and won't hit you. A stupid driver is clueless and will hit you because he doesn't know any better. Yes, there's a difference. > > As a bicyclist, I see a lot of this. Adding a bicycle to the equation > > seems > > to freak them out even more. I used to turn around and motion them to go > > ahead while I was waiting to go straight, but that gets old after a while. > > Sigh, I can't see you complaining about some little old lady not turning > right on red if you are out there clogging up the roads with your bike. And > don't give me the BS about how you outrun most traffic. I don't outrun even the little old ladies turning right. I do, however, do my best to keep out of the way of cars by riding as far to the right as practicable. > Think about how many > people slow down in reaction to your presence when you are on the bike and > multiply that out. If they slow down for me even if I'm not in their way and give no indication that I'm going to get in their way in the foreseeable future, then it's their problem and they don't know how to drive. People that stupid are a danger to themselves and others and a merciful god would direct them over an uninhabited cliff at the first opportunity. > In the end you are just another impatient driver who is > unwilling to tolerate even the slightest impediment to your drive, while at > the same time not giving a damn how many people you cut off or slow down. > Just be honest, it is all about you. Of course it is. So is voting. ALL drivers should do their best to get where they're going as expeditiously as possible without injuring anyone. If everyone were smart enough to do that we'd have a lot fewer traffic problems. > > Right on red is legal in most states now. Anybody know where it still > > isn't? > > According to > http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/outr...1995/TT086.htm : > > "Since January 1, 1980, all 50 states and the District of Columbia and > Puerto Rico have had laws permitting right-turn-on-red unless a sign > prohibits the turn. As of January 1, 1994, 43 jurisdictions provided for > left-turn-on-red (LTOR) and nine did not. LTOR is permitted only at the > intersection of a one-way street with another one-way street." > > At least ROR rules aren't significantly contributing to the death rate. > However, you might be interested in reading this reference since a large > portion of the ROR accidents involve bicycles and pedestrians. They probably involve cars, too. -- Cheers, Bev --------------------------------- aibohphobia - fear of palindromes |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
"N8N" > wrote in message oups.com... > > > 223rem wrote: >> Nate Nagel wrote: >> >> > In fact, more often than not, I see >> > people turning directly into the right lane. Why, I dunno. >> >> Less cornering effort > > Not significantly, if you are doing it right. I actually think it's > that people turn in/apex way too early, because nobody ever showed them > the right way to take a corner. Which is scary in and of itself if you > think about it... > I was taught while sitting on my step-dad's lap "steering" at the age of eleven on family vacations. He would tell me I was only allowed to turn in more until the apex, then only allowed to turn back out. (no back and forth corrections) It actually made alot of sense to me then, and now. Kinda scary to think of me steering a '74 Buick Century Regal at highway speeds on two lane roads, but that was my introdution to driving. Bernard |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
'99 Intrepid - Dealer Stripped Oil Pan Drain threads? | officehelp1981 | Chrysler | 36 | July 5th 05 11:13 AM |
auto lockers | [email protected] | Jeep | 50 | May 2nd 05 10:47 PM |
Lateral stress on sway bar mounts | Carl Saiyed | Jeep | 5 | April 20th 05 12:44 AM |
Poor Milage | linda grommon | Dodge | 26 | March 12th 05 09:58 AM |
Minimum Lift Question | Fred Garvin | Jeep | 23 | December 26th 04 05:46 PM |