If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
89 civic
loewent wrote:
> Replaced the sparkplug o-rings today.... they were leaking like > sieves..... Couldn't figure out why the car smelt like it had an oil > leak, but wasn't losing any oil... I guess as the spark plug tubes > filled up, they got to the point when they were in contact with the > plug boots, and made a burnt oil smell. do the "b" seals, but don't bother with the ones below that. unless the cam gets unbolted, they never leak. > > Also, rummaging around in the trunk of my newly acquired car, I found > a box... had a brand new OEM timing belt in it. SWEET... that belt is > worth like $60 up here! This leads me to beleive the former owner was > thinking about doing the t-belt sometime soon... Can I use a new belt > that has been sitting in the box in the trunk for 2 years? sure. > > t > > > On Apr 30, 10:12�am, "Elle" > wrote: >> "loewent" > wrote >> >> >> >> >> >>> Well the legacy is over, my 98 civic has met its fate on >>> the back end >>> of a 93 ranger. �I was the only one in the car, and walked >>> away with >>> no injuries. >>> 10500 in damage, it is beyond repair. >>> So I need a car, don't want to spend the whole insurance >>> settlement on >>> a car. >>> Yesterday I picked up an 89 civic 4 door automatic for >>> $375. �Body is >>> a little rough, but runs like a charm! �276k kms, 171k >>> miles. >> Original owner, 91 Civic, 203k miles here. I get parts from >> 89 Civics at the junkyard all the time for my 91. >> >> Why's the price so low? Just the rough body? >> >> One thing I am on the lookout for with low priced Civics of >> this era are failed head gaskets. >> >>> Taking it for a safety tomorrow, hoping to get about 6 >>> months to a >>> year out of er. >>> Any pointers from anyone on this vintage of civic? >> Check for oil in the spark plug tubes. For a car this old >> with this many miles, it's likely the camshaft holder-cyl >> head O-rings are leaking. OTOH, if you only want it to last >> six months, maybe you can forego this job. >> >> When was the timing belt replaced? >> >> Suspension could probably stand rebuilding, butagain, for >> only six months, I think the above is all I'd be really >> worried about.- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
89 civic
I personally would not expect a boxed timing belt to degrade
after two years. Coincidentally I had a bagged one in the closet for about two years. I installed it last summer. No problems as yet. :-) "loewent" > wrote Replaced the sparkplug o-rings today.... they were leaking like sieves..... Couldn't figure out why the car smelt like it had an oil leak, but wasn't losing any oil... I guess as the spark plug tubes filled up, they got to the point when they were in contact with the plug boots, and made a burnt oil smell. Also, rummaging around in the trunk of my newly acquired car, I found a box... had a brand new OEM timing belt in it. SWEET... that belt is worth like $60 up here! This leads me to beleive the former owner was thinking about doing the t-belt sometime soon... Can I use a new belt that has been sitting in the box in the trunk for 2 years? t On Apr 30, 10:12 am, "Elle" > wrote: > "loewent" > wrote > > > > > > > Well the legacy is over, my 98 civic has met its fate on > > the back end > > of a 93 ranger. I was the only one in the car, and > > walked > > away with > > no injuries. > > > 10500 in damage, it is beyond repair. > > > So I need a car, don't want to spend the whole insurance > > settlement on > > a car. > > > Yesterday I picked up an 89 civic 4 door automatic for > > $375. Body is > > a little rough, but runs like a charm! 276k kms, 171k > > miles. > > Original owner, 91 Civic, 203k miles here. I get parts > from > 89 Civics at the junkyard all the time for my 91. > > Why's the price so low? Just the rough body? > > One thing I am on the lookout for with low priced Civics > of > this era are failed head gaskets. > > > Taking it for a safety tomorrow, hoping to get about 6 > > months to a > > year out of er. > > > Any pointers from anyone on this vintage of civic? > > Check for oil in the spark plug tubes. For a car this old > with this many miles, it's likely the camshaft holder-cyl > head O-rings are leaking. OTOH, if you only want it to > last > six months, maybe you can forego this job. > > When was the timing belt replaced? > > Suspension could probably stand rebuilding, butagain, for > only six months, I think the above is all I'd be really > worried about.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
89 civic
As for the brakes, I am thinking rotor replacement with some
'cheapies'.... my father in law decided to do me a favour while we were resurrecting this car, he thought the car may not pass safety inspection with visible rust on the disks... (actually that is pretty likely, most shops will try to use any leverage they can to get extra $ $ for parts outta you) so on the way from his place to the shop (about 20km highway drive) he spent the whole time speeding up and braking hard. He said he did this to the point where the brake fluid was so hot, the brakes wouldn't work anymore... Wish he woulda just left it alone, I would have rather argued with the shop than have to replace the rotors.... Finally did the oil change and transmission fluid rotation yesterday. The 2 year old oil in this car looked great still, I'm glad I ran the car for a couple weeks before changing it... gave it a chance to clean the engine out some. As for the trannie fluid, dropped 2.5 liters out of the trannie, it looked pretty good, a little particulate in it to make it less than crystal clear. Also, it looked like regular dexron, especially when I compared it to the Honda Z1 I added, the colour is very different... red (dex) vs flourescent pink (z1). Shifts are much softer now... don't let anyone tell you Honda Z1 is a waste of money. I will let the trannie run for a couple weeks now and do another fluid 'rotation'... good ole drain and fill.... Also, this being my first time underneath this car for any extended period... I was very impressed to see that there is NO corrosion anywhere on the underside of this vehicle. The outside is rough and rusty, underneath it might as well be a brand new car... exhaust system included! Very odd to find a car in this condition at this age in the Manitoba Rust Belt.... t On May 6, 10:50Â*pm, jim beam > wrote: > loewent wrote: > > Body is not great. Â*Wife hates the car. Â*She says I didn't 'talk to > > her enough about it'. Â*oh well... lol > > oh well! > > > > > Will be replacing brake rotors, they are warped. > > before you replace, do this: > scrape off the hub face, and the inside of the wheel so they're both > free of rust. Â*smear a little antiseize on both surfaces, then re-torque > the lug nuts in a 2 or more stage process, in the correct sequence, > correct torque. > > every single time i've ever had a honda go in the shop where they fasten > wheels with air tools, the disks "warp". Â*every time i do the above, the > "warp" magically disappears. Â*no disk replacements for me. > > > Â*If the bleeder bolts > > on the calipers aren't too corroded, will do a brake fluid flush as > > well. Â*Brakes are mushy, hope its not the master cylinder. > > sounds like you need to do the bleeding all the way through. Â*need to > open up those bleed nipples even if you drill and replace. > > > Â*if I can't > > get the bleeders off, will use the turkey baster method. > > sometimes you can try bleeding at the banjo bolt, but it's not > recommended because it's easy to make things worse, not better. > > > > > > > Will also do the standard fluid changes, oil and tranny specifically. > > Coolant is new, PS fluid looks good. Â*Picked up 4L of Honda Z1 > > today.... $40!!! geez.... > > > A good sign on this car is the OEM oil filter I found underneath. > > Also found an OEM timing belt brand new in the box in the trunk. Â*I > > will take this as a hint that the timing belt needs to be done soon. > > > Hopefully once I replace the fluids, and drive it for a week or 2, > > some of the other tune up items will make themselves more apparent. Â*I > > am thinking plugs, plug wires and dist cap and rotor. > > > So far so good, and drives like a champ. Â*Just got the old manitoba > > safety inspection done today, it needed some bulbs and a hole in the > > muffler welded over. Â*$80 later I have a 'road worthy' vehicle... > > > t > > > On May 4, 10:43 am, jim beam > wrote: > >> loewent wrote: > >>> Body is really rough. Â*Good old winnipeg road salt can be blamed for > >>> that. Â*There is a small hole in one of the rocker panels, we are > >>> repairing it. Â*Rust at the bottom of the doors. > >>> I probably won't spend alot of money on it. Â*I should clarify, I would > >>> be happy if it lasted 6 months, though I am sure it will go for much > >>> longer. > >>> Not sure on the t-belt, will inspect to see if it looks fresh or not. > >>> May just swap it out anyways, can't be much different than doing it on > >>> my 98. > >>> Antifreeze was clean, after sitting 2 yrs, I don't think this one has > >>> a head gasket issue. > >>> Literally put a different battery in and the thing started like it had > >>> been used every day, but in reality had been sitting for over 2 years. > >>> t > >>> On Apr 30, 10:12�am, "Elle" > wrote: > >>>> "loewent" > wrote > >>>>> Well the legacy is over, my 98 civic has met its fate on > >>>>> the back end > >>>>> of a 93 ranger. �I was the only one in the car, and walked > >>>>> away with > >>>>> no injuries. > >>>>> 10500 in damage, it is beyond repair. > >>>>> So I need a car, don't want to spend the whole insurance > >>>>> settlement on > >>>>> a car. > >>>>> Yesterday I picked up an 89 civic 4 door automatic for > >>>>> $375. �Body is > >>>>> a little rough, but runs like a charm! �276k kms, 171k > >>>>> miles. > >>>> Original owner, 91 Civic, 203k miles here. I get parts from > >>>> 89 Civics at the junkyard all the time for my 91. > >>>> Why's the price so low? Just the rough body? > >>>> One thing I am on the lookout for with low priced Civics of > >>>> this era are failed head gaskets. > >>>>> Taking it for a safety tomorrow, hoping to get about 6 > >>>>> months to a > >>>>> year out of er. > >>>>> Any pointers from anyone on this vintage of civic? > >>>> Check for oil in the spark plug tubes. For a car this old > >>>> with this many miles, it's likely the camshaft holder-cyl > >>>> head O-rings are leaking. OTOH, if you only want it to last > >>>> six months, maybe you can forego this job. > >>>> When was the timing belt replaced? > >>>> Suspension could probably stand rebuilding, butagain, for > >>>> only six months, I think the above is all I'd be really > >>>> worried about.- Hide quoted text - > >>>> - Show quoted text - > >> if the body's that bad, i'd just make sure the ignition system was good, > >> the brakes good, and leave it at that. > > >> there's lots more you can do if you want, main relay, valve lash, > >> t-belt, rear trailing arm bushings, but they're not worth it for a > >> 6-month gig. Â*unless you want to have a bit of fun. Â*if i were going to > >> thrash it, i'd inspect the t-belt and bushings as a priority.- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
89 civic
loewent wrote:
> As for the brakes, I am thinking rotor replacement with some > 'cheapies'.... my father in law decided to do me a favour while we > were resurrecting this car, he thought the car may not pass safety > inspection with visible rust on the disks... (actually that is pretty > likely, most shops will try to use any leverage they can to get extra $ > $ for parts outta you) so on the way from his place to the shop (about > 20km highway drive) he spent the whole time speeding up and braking > hard. He said he did this to the point where the brake fluid was so > hot, the brakes wouldn't work anymore... that's less likely to be brake fluid, and much more likely to be cheapo after-market pads. for about five extra bucks, you get honda pads, shims and anti-squeal grease. oh, and very good fade resistance. > Wish he woulda just left it > alone, I would have rather argued with the shop than have to replace > the rotors.... my experience with aftermarket rotors is ok, so consider those if you're saving bucks on a car like this. don't go for the cheapest chinese disks though - i've seen casting errors and cracking. stock replacement brembos from somewhere like summit are just dandy. > > Finally did the oil change and transmission fluid rotation yesterday. > The 2 year old oil in this car looked great still, I'm glad I ran the > car for a couple weeks before changing it... gave it a chance to clean > the engine out some. > > As for the trannie fluid, dropped 2.5 liters out of the trannie, it > looked pretty good, a little particulate in it to make it less than > crystal clear. Also, it looked like regular dexron, especially when I > compared it to the Honda Z1 I added, the colour is very different... > red (dex) vs flourescent pink (z1). > > Shifts are much softer now... don't let anyone tell you Honda Z1 is a > waste of money. indeed. basically, the only people that tell you otherwise are those with no experience of this! > > I will let the trannie run for a couple weeks now and do another fluid > 'rotation'... good ole drain and fill.... > > Also, this being my first time underneath this car for any extended > period... I was very impressed to see that there is NO corrosion > anywhere on the underside of this vehicle. The outside is rough and > rusty, underneath it might as well be a brand new car... exhaust > system included! Very odd to find a car in this condition at this age > in the Manitoba Rust Belt.... > > t > > > > On May 6, 10:50 pm, jim beam > wrote: >> loewent wrote: >>> Body is not great. Wife hates the car. She says I didn't 'talk to >>> her enough about it'. oh well... lol >> oh well! >> >> >> >>> Will be replacing brake rotors, they are warped. >> before you replace, do this: >> scrape off the hub face, and the inside of the wheel so they're both >> free of rust. smear a little antiseize on both surfaces, then re-torque >> the lug nuts in a 2 or more stage process, in the correct sequence, >> correct torque. >> >> every single time i've ever had a honda go in the shop where they fasten >> wheels with air tools, the disks "warp". every time i do the above, the >> "warp" magically disappears. no disk replacements for me. >> >>> If the bleeder bolts >>> on the calipers aren't too corroded, will do a brake fluid flush as >>> well. Brakes are mushy, hope its not the master cylinder. >> sounds like you need to do the bleeding all the way through. need to >> open up those bleed nipples even if you drill and replace. >> >>> if I can't >>> get the bleeders off, will use the turkey baster method. >> sometimes you can try bleeding at the banjo bolt, but it's not >> recommended because it's easy to make things worse, not better. >> >> >> >> >> >>> Will also do the standard fluid changes, oil and tranny specifically. >>> Coolant is new, PS fluid looks good. Picked up 4L of Honda Z1 >>> today.... $40!!! geez.... >>> A good sign on this car is the OEM oil filter I found underneath. >>> Also found an OEM timing belt brand new in the box in the trunk. I >>> will take this as a hint that the timing belt needs to be done soon. >>> Hopefully once I replace the fluids, and drive it for a week or 2, >>> some of the other tune up items will make themselves more apparent. I >>> am thinking plugs, plug wires and dist cap and rotor. >>> So far so good, and drives like a champ. Just got the old manitoba >>> safety inspection done today, it needed some bulbs and a hole in the >>> muffler welded over. $80 later I have a 'road worthy' vehicle... >>> t >>> On May 4, 10:43 am, jim beam > wrote: >>>> loewent wrote: >>>>> Body is really rough. Good old winnipeg road salt can be blamed for >>>>> that. There is a small hole in one of the rocker panels, we are >>>>> repairing it. Rust at the bottom of the doors. >>>>> I probably won't spend alot of money on it. I should clarify, I would >>>>> be happy if it lasted 6 months, though I am sure it will go for much >>>>> longer. >>>>> Not sure on the t-belt, will inspect to see if it looks fresh or not. >>>>> May just swap it out anyways, can't be much different than doing it on >>>>> my 98. >>>>> Antifreeze was clean, after sitting 2 yrs, I don't think this one has >>>>> a head gasket issue. >>>>> Literally put a different battery in and the thing started like it had >>>>> been used every day, but in reality had been sitting for over 2 years. >>>>> t >>>>> On Apr 30, 10:12�am, "Elle" > wrote: >>>>>> "loewent" > wrote >>>>>>> Well the legacy is over, my 98 civic has met its fate on >>>>>>> the back end >>>>>>> of a 93 ranger. �I was the only one in the car, and walked >>>>>>> away with >>>>>>> no injuries. >>>>>>> 10500 in damage, it is beyond repair. >>>>>>> So I need a car, don't want to spend the whole insurance >>>>>>> settlement on >>>>>>> a car. >>>>>>> Yesterday I picked up an 89 civic 4 door automatic for >>>>>>> $375. �Body is >>>>>>> a little rough, but runs like a charm! �276k kms, 171k >>>>>>> miles. >>>>>> Original owner, 91 Civic, 203k miles here. I get parts from >>>>>> 89 Civics at the junkyard all the time for my 91. >>>>>> Why's the price so low? Just the rough body? >>>>>> One thing I am on the lookout for with low priced Civics of >>>>>> this era are failed head gaskets. >>>>>>> Taking it for a safety tomorrow, hoping to get about 6 >>>>>>> months to a >>>>>>> year out of er. >>>>>>> Any pointers from anyone on this vintage of civic? >>>>>> Check for oil in the spark plug tubes. For a car this old >>>>>> with this many miles, it's likely the camshaft holder-cyl >>>>>> head O-rings are leaking. OTOH, if you only want it to last >>>>>> six months, maybe you can forego this job. >>>>>> When was the timing belt replaced? >>>>>> Suspension could probably stand rebuilding, butagain, for >>>>>> only six months, I think the above is all I'd be really >>>>>> worried about.- Hide quoted text - >>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>> if the body's that bad, i'd just make sure the ignition system was good, >>>> the brakes good, and leave it at that. >>>> there's lots more you can do if you want, main relay, valve lash, >>>> t-belt, rear trailing arm bushings, but they're not worth it for a >>>> 6-month gig. unless you want to have a bit of fun. if i were going to >>>> thrash it, i'd inspect the t-belt and bushings as a priority.- Hide quoted text - >>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> - Show quoted text - > |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
89 civic
jim beam wrote:
> loewent wrote: >> As for the brakes, I am thinking rotor replacement with some >> 'cheapies'.... my father in law decided to do me a favour while we >> were resurrecting this car, he thought the car may not pass safety >> inspection with visible rust on the disks... (actually that is pretty >> likely, most shops will try to use any leverage they can to get extra $ >> $ for parts outta you) so on the way from his place to the shop (about >> 20km highway drive) he spent the whole time speeding up and braking >> hard. He said he did this to the point where the brake fluid was so >> hot, the brakes wouldn't work anymore... > > that's less likely to be brake fluid, and much more likely to be cheapo > after-market pads. for about five extra bucks, you get honda pads, > shims and anti-squeal grease. oh, and very good fade resistance. > > > >> Wish he woulda just left it >> alone, I would have rather argued with the shop than have to replace >> the rotors.... > > my experience with aftermarket rotors is ok, so consider those if you're > saving bucks on a car like this. don't go for the cheapest chinese > disks though - i've seen casting errors and cracking. stock replacement > brembos from somewhere like summit are just dandy. one more thing - if you have the original '89 brake calipers, you need to make sure the disks are the right ones. most aftermarket, and indeed honda disks, assume you've changed to a later style caliper that takes a slightly thicker disk. that thicker disk will just fit inside the older caliper, but it will rub when you go around corners. shops will just skim the disks so they fit, which i don't like since so many shops don't cut disks exactly square. bottom line, check into this and make sure you either have the right disks or the right calipers. i shopped around and found the right disks, but the honda dealer didn't have them. if the car were a keeper, i'd suggest going for the new calipers too, but hey, maybe you can just get new pads and use silicon carbide paper to get the rust off the disk faces if your originals are not too badly grooved or worn. > > >> >> Finally did the oil change and transmission fluid rotation yesterday. >> The 2 year old oil in this car looked great still, I'm glad I ran the >> car for a couple weeks before changing it... gave it a chance to clean >> the engine out some. >> >> As for the trannie fluid, dropped 2.5 liters out of the trannie, it >> looked pretty good, a little particulate in it to make it less than >> crystal clear. Also, it looked like regular dexron, especially when I >> compared it to the Honda Z1 I added, the colour is very different... >> red (dex) vs flourescent pink (z1). >> >> Shifts are much softer now... don't let anyone tell you Honda Z1 is a >> waste of money. > > indeed. basically, the only people that tell you otherwise are those > with no experience of this! > > >> >> I will let the trannie run for a couple weeks now and do another fluid >> 'rotation'... good ole drain and fill.... >> >> Also, this being my first time underneath this car for any extended >> period... I was very impressed to see that there is NO corrosion >> anywhere on the underside of this vehicle. The outside is rough and >> rusty, underneath it might as well be a brand new car... exhaust >> system included! Very odd to find a car in this condition at this age >> in the Manitoba Rust Belt.... >> >> t >> >> >> >> On May 6, 10:50 pm, jim beam > wrote: >>> loewent wrote: >>>> Body is not great. Wife hates the car. She says I didn't 'talk to >>>> her enough about it'. oh well... lol >>> oh well! >>> >>> >>> >>>> Will be replacing brake rotors, they are warped. >>> before you replace, do this: >>> scrape off the hub face, and the inside of the wheel so they're both >>> free of rust. smear a little antiseize on both surfaces, then re-torque >>> the lug nuts in a 2 or more stage process, in the correct sequence, >>> correct torque. >>> >>> every single time i've ever had a honda go in the shop where they fasten >>> wheels with air tools, the disks "warp". every time i do the above, the >>> "warp" magically disappears. no disk replacements for me. >>> >>>> If the bleeder bolts >>>> on the calipers aren't too corroded, will do a brake fluid flush as >>>> well. Brakes are mushy, hope its not the master cylinder. >>> sounds like you need to do the bleeding all the way through. need to >>> open up those bleed nipples even if you drill and replace. >>> >>>> if I can't >>>> get the bleeders off, will use the turkey baster method. >>> sometimes you can try bleeding at the banjo bolt, but it's not >>> recommended because it's easy to make things worse, not better. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Will also do the standard fluid changes, oil and tranny specifically. >>>> Coolant is new, PS fluid looks good. Picked up 4L of Honda Z1 >>>> today.... $40!!! geez.... >>>> A good sign on this car is the OEM oil filter I found underneath. >>>> Also found an OEM timing belt brand new in the box in the trunk. I >>>> will take this as a hint that the timing belt needs to be done soon. >>>> Hopefully once I replace the fluids, and drive it for a week or 2, >>>> some of the other tune up items will make themselves more apparent. I >>>> am thinking plugs, plug wires and dist cap and rotor. >>>> So far so good, and drives like a champ. Just got the old manitoba >>>> safety inspection done today, it needed some bulbs and a hole in the >>>> muffler welded over. $80 later I have a 'road worthy' vehicle... >>>> t >>>> On May 4, 10:43 am, jim beam > wrote: >>>>> loewent wrote: >>>>>> Body is really rough. Good old winnipeg road salt can be blamed for >>>>>> that. There is a small hole in one of the rocker panels, we are >>>>>> repairing it. Rust at the bottom of the doors. >>>>>> I probably won't spend alot of money on it. I should clarify, I >>>>>> would >>>>>> be happy if it lasted 6 months, though I am sure it will go for much >>>>>> longer. >>>>>> Not sure on the t-belt, will inspect to see if it looks fresh or not. >>>>>> May just swap it out anyways, can't be much different than doing >>>>>> it on >>>>>> my 98. >>>>>> Antifreeze was clean, after sitting 2 yrs, I don't think this one has >>>>>> a head gasket issue. >>>>>> Literally put a different battery in and the thing started like it >>>>>> had >>>>>> been used every day, but in reality had been sitting for over 2 >>>>>> years. >>>>>> t >>>>>> On Apr 30, 10:12�am, "Elle" > wrote: >>>>>>> "loewent" > wrote >>>>>>>> Well the legacy is over, my 98 civic has met its fate on >>>>>>>> the back end >>>>>>>> of a 93 ranger. �I was the only one in the car, and walked >>>>>>>> away with >>>>>>>> no injuries. >>>>>>>> 10500 in damage, it is beyond repair. >>>>>>>> So I need a car, don't want to spend the whole insurance >>>>>>>> settlement on >>>>>>>> a car. >>>>>>>> Yesterday I picked up an 89 civic 4 door automatic for >>>>>>>> $375. �Body is >>>>>>>> a little rough, but runs like a charm! �276k kms, 171k >>>>>>>> miles. >>>>>>> Original owner, 91 Civic, 203k miles here. I get parts from >>>>>>> 89 Civics at the junkyard all the time for my 91. >>>>>>> Why's the price so low? Just the rough body? >>>>>>> One thing I am on the lookout for with low priced Civics of >>>>>>> this era are failed head gaskets. >>>>>>>> Taking it for a safety tomorrow, hoping to get about 6 >>>>>>>> months to a >>>>>>>> year out of er. >>>>>>>> Any pointers from anyone on this vintage of civic? >>>>>>> Check for oil in the spark plug tubes. For a car this old >>>>>>> with this many miles, it's likely the camshaft holder-cyl >>>>>>> head O-rings are leaking. OTOH, if you only want it to last >>>>>>> six months, maybe you can forego this job. >>>>>>> When was the timing belt replaced? >>>>>>> Suspension could probably stand rebuilding, butagain, for >>>>>>> only six months, I think the above is all I'd be really >>>>>>> worried about.- Hide quoted text - >>>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>> if the body's that bad, i'd just make sure the ignition system was >>>>> good, >>>>> the brakes good, and leave it at that. >>>>> there's lots more you can do if you want, main relay, valve lash, >>>>> t-belt, rear trailing arm bushings, but they're not worth it for a >>>>> 6-month gig. unless you want to have a bit of fun. if i were >>>>> going to >>>>> thrash it, i'd inspect the t-belt and bushings as a priority.- Hide >>>>> quoted text - >>>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >>> - Show quoted text - >> |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
89 civic
> that's less likely to be brake fluid, and much more likely to be cheapo
> after-market pads. for about five extra bucks, you get honda pads, > shims and anti-squeal grease. oh, and very good fade resistance. Have not pulled off the calipers, but it would surprise me if they were not OEM... Everything on this car I have inspected thus far is a factory or OEM replacement part. Oil Filter, even the replacement timing belt I found in the trunk. You've never met my father-in-law... trust me he cooked em.... |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
89 civic
loewent wrote:
>> that's less likely to be brake fluid, and much more likely to be cheapo >> after-market pads. for about five extra bucks, you get honda pads, >> shims and anti-squeal grease. oh, and very good fade resistance. > > Have not pulled off the calipers, but it would surprise me if they > were not OEM... Everything on this car I have inspected thus far is a > factory or OEM replacement part. Oil Filter, even the replacement > timing belt I found in the trunk. well, my 90 crx had one "wide" and one "narrow" caliper on it [it should have had two "wide"], and that was "all stock", so don't make any assumptions! > > You've never met my father-in-law... trust me he cooked em.... that brake fade is still almost certainly pads, not fluid. i've "tested" with fully loaded cars on the hills of san francisco. trust me, some after-market pads will have you pushing the pedal like you're trying to break the seat off its rails once things get warm. honda pads, the fade is barely noticeable. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mpg 97 civic | runsrealfast | Honda | 7 | July 3rd 06 03:46 PM |
Cheap, reliable used Civic? Finding cheap/reliable Civic to last 3 years? | [email protected] | Honda | 38 | April 10th 06 12:27 PM |
would a gear box out of a 95 civic SOHC fot a 97 civic coupe SOHC? | civic_coupe | Honda | 0 | August 2nd 05 03:58 PM |
Installing Alpine CDM-s620 and civic 99 radio/headunit in 90 civic wagon | Theodore Chan | Honda | 2 | April 21st 05 03:34 AM |
Honda Civic Dx special edition vs Civic Dx? | Prelude | Honda | 0 | February 4th 05 10:15 PM |