2007 Sebring - ugly?

Just saw pics of it on Chrysler's site, I must say I'd take the 2006
over it any day. Back end is too stubby, very boring looking to me.

frenchy wrote:
>
> Just saw pics of it on Chrysler's site, I must say I'd take the 2006
> over it any day. Back end is too stubby, very boring looking to me.

I went to www.chrysler.com/sebring. What a horribly ugly looking car.
Maybe it looks better in real life.

In article . com>,
"frenchy" > wrote:

> Just saw pics of it on Chrysler's site, I must say I'd take the 2006
> over it any day. Back end is too stubby, very boring looking to me.
THX for the tip. I had a look, better styling in the front, but I agree
the rear is a bit strange and slighlty ugly, but we'll get used to it.
The rear window is pushed to the rear and the hood looks longer. Was the
hood made longer just to contain the excessive 3.5L engine?
I can't see the trunk being as large as the current one.
Overall dimension specs seem much the same as the current Sebring.
But at a quick glance:
-No variable valve timing on the now dated V6s, just on the 4 cyl.
-Who really needs the huge 3.5L engine on this car?
-Low grade Firestone / Bridgestone tires.

"frenchy" > wrote in news:1152159050.565613.18390
@b68g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

> Just saw pics of it on Chrysler's site, I must say I'd take the 2006
> over it any day. Back end is too stubby, very boring looking to me.

It's a Pacifica from the front and a Caliber from the rear.

"frenchy" > wrote in message
ups.com...
> Just saw pics of it on Chrysler's site, I must say I'd take the 2006
> over it any day. Back end is too stubby, very boring looking to me.

I just purchased a 2004 sebring and while waiting for the paperwork walked
around the new car showroom and saw a burgundy red sebring. I liked the
interiors, black and fake chorme, but the exterior styling certainly is
ugly.

The only improvement on the 07 Sebring is the crossfire hood