134a Refrigerant

Fact: Evidence confirms a long-held theory that solar storms
deplete the upper-level ozone:
http://www.space.com/scienceastronom..._010828-3.html
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
http://www.billhughes.com/

Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
>
> 'Suck off the government'? Perhaps you're referring to
> the super-rich, who have recently been given massive
> tax breaks... that would qualify as 'suck'.
>
> Until you pull your head out, Bill, you won't
> see much, I'll grant you that!
>
> Common myths about ozone depletion:
>
> Myth: CFCs cannot reach the stratosphere because they are heavier than air.
><snip bleeding heart sponge off government type rhetoric.>

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...oogle+Searc h

"L.W.(ßill) Hughes III" wrote:
>
> Fact: Evidence confirms a long-held theory that solar storms
> deplete the upper-level ozone:
> http://www.space.com/scienceastronom..._010828-3.html
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> http://www.billhughes.com/

"L.W. (ßill) Hughes III" > wrote in message
...

> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > <>
> > We think that within the next 20 years we are likely to see an ozone
hole
> > perhaps as big as the present one over Antarctica but over the North
Pole."
> > Joseph Farman, Brian Gardiner and Jonathan Shanklin, are the BAS
scientists
> > who discovered the Antarctic ozone hole.
> > Professor Shanklin also is the Director of the British Astronomical
> > Association's Comet Section and the President of the Cambridge Natural
> > History Society

> Another study you free loaders don't take into consideration is
> that the ozone layer has always naturally fluctuated on an eleven year
> sun spot cycle. I bet you haven't even heard of the almost direct solar
> flare hits earth's taken in just this last year:

> http://www.crh.noaa.gov/fsd/astro/sunspots.htm Of course not! It doesn't
> fit your Chlorofluorocarbons scenario.

The word 'ozone' does not appear on that page...
neither do the words 'CFC, flouro-, chloro'...
you're just posting the first thing Google gives
you, like that crystal mysticism link. Find some
more of that crap, that was funny!

I hear about *every* 'burp' the sun makes... I'm a ham,
remember?

The more you try to spin, the more stupid you look...

Read this some mo

<>
Myth: The Antarctic ozone "hole" was there all along, it was discovered in
the 1970's because that's when satellite measurements started.
Fact: The hole was discovered using a ground based instrument that had been
in use since 1956. There was no hole until about 1976. That means about 20
years with no hole. Since the 70s the hole has continued to increase in size
and intensity (Farman, et al, Jones & Shanklin).
Myth: The "hole" was present when the first measurements were made in 1956.
Fact: The first ozone measurements made in the Antarctic were lower than
similar measurements made in the Arctic. However, this is the natural
condition, not the decrease that is referred to as the ozone "hole". As
noted above, there was no "hole" during the first 20 or so years of
measurement. (Parson, Christie).
Myth: Some French researchers found an ozone hole in 1958.
Fact: Paul A. Newman (Newman) looked at all the facts and found that "There
is no credible evidence for an ozone hole in 1958."
</>
__
Steve
..

"L.W. (ßill) Hughes III" > wrote in message
...
> I want to see this BS degree, if you can't display it then we will
> know you are a liar.

It should be in your inbox now, as a .tiff inside a .zip.
Let me know if you can't open it.... let everyone here
know that you received it, and that it appears genuine.
__
Steve
BS, with no bs
..

"L.W. (ßill) Hughes III" > wrote in message
...
> Fact: Evidence confirms a long-held theory that solar storms
> deplete the upper-level ozone:
>
http://www.space.com/scienceastronom..._010828-3.html

Well, let's read the link you posted!

<>
Most researchers agree that the increased depletion is caused by the human
production of chlorofluorocarbons, which means the human impact far exceeds
that of the solar cycle.
</>

Once again, hoisted on his own petard. Best stop
posting those petards!
__
Steve
..

"L.W. (ßill) Hughes III" > wrote in message
...
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...oogle+Searc h

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search

__
Steve
..

Would it make this conversation even more off topic if I wanted to know what
effect the slave traffic in africa is having on the new Kumho Venture ATs
that are on my JGC?

"Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message
m...
>
> "Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message
>> m...
>> > Like it or not, Saddam was not an Islamicist.
>>
>> you just REFUSE to comment directly on the whole young girls being raped
> by
>> his sons thing. why is that? why can you not acknowledge any good at
> all?
>
> Why bother? The whole point is, you confused
> Iraq with Afghanistan... just like Bush did.
> You bring up young girls raped just to
> try and cloud the issue... there's a lot
> more raping going on in Sudan, but
> Bush is foot-dragging on the legislation
> that would send the UN there. We don't
> really think you give a damn about any
> Iraqi women... you're just trying to save
> face... you got in an argument with a
> non-pussy tree hugger, and you lost it...
> and made a complete fool of yourself
> trying. Science, Nate... Science.
> Read about it sometime.
> __
> Steve
> .
>
>

Chlorofluorocarbons, have been against the law to produce for over
ten years, get over it!
And pray the Sun doesn't shot another solar flare in our direction:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...oogle+Searc h
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
http://www.billhughes.com/

Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> The word 'ozone' does not appear on that page...
> neither do the words 'CFC, flouro-, chloro'...
> you're just posting the first thing Google gives
> you, like that crystal mysticism link. Find some
> more of that crap, that was funny!
>
> I hear about *every* 'burp' the sun makes... I'm a ham,
> remember?
>
> The more you try to spin, the more stupid you look...
>
> Read this some mo
>
> <>
> Myth: The Antarctic ozone "hole" was there all along, it was discovered in
> the 1970's because that's when satellite measurements started.
> Fact: The hole was discovered using a ground based instrument that had been
> in use since 1956. There was no hole until about 1976. That means about 20
> years with no hole. Since the 70s the hole has continued to increase in size
> and intensity (Farman, et al, Jones & Shanklin).
> Myth: The "hole" was present when the first measurements were made in 1956.
> Fact: The first ozone measurements made in the Antarctic were lower than
> similar measurements made in the Arctic. However, this is the natural
> condition, not the decrease that is referred to as the ozone "hole". As
> noted above, there was no "hole" during the first 20 or so years of
> measurement. (Parson, Christie).
> Myth: Some French researchers found an ozone hole in 1958.
> Fact: Paul A. Newman (Newman) looked at all the facts and found that "There
> is no credible evidence for an ozone hole in 1958."
> </>
> __
> Steve
> .

Congratulations, I was young and stupid once myself:
http://www.billhughes.com/stevDegree.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O



Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> It should be in your inbox now, as a .tiff inside a .zip.
> Let me know if you can't open it.... let everyone here
> know that you received it, and that it appears genuine.
> __
> Steve
> BS, with no bs
> .

Typical bleeding heart liberal, when confronted with facts, resort
to name calling.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
http://www.billhughes.com/


Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search
>
> __
> Steve
> .