If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#291
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Bill Putney wrote:
> (they may have > purged both from their web site by now - haven't checked) Riiiight. They've purged it. And the APA and the UN endorse NAMBLA. Uh-huh. I think your foil hat might be leaking space rays. Might want to look into a replacement. |
Ads |
#292
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Bill Putney wrote:
> (they may have > purged both from their web site by now - haven't checked) Riiiight. They've purged it. And the APA and the UN endorse NAMBLA. Uh-huh. I think your foil hat might be leaking space rays. Might want to look into a replacement. |
#293
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, James C. Reeves wrote:
> Just curious. How did all of these people achieve such great and > productive ends if discrimination was anywhere near the level claimed. Invidious discrimination doesn't prevent people from leading productive lives -- it does, however, make life a great deal less pleasant and a great deal harder. |
#294
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, James C. Reeves wrote:
> Just curious. How did all of these people achieve such great and > productive ends if discrimination was anywhere near the level claimed. Invidious discrimination doesn't prevent people from leading productive lives -- it does, however, make life a great deal less pleasant and a great deal harder. |
#295
|
|||
|
|||
Daniel J. Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Bill Putney wrote: > > >>linda wrote: > > >>>>>Is that the same APA that published a "scientific" study that said that >>>>>it was found that pediphilia did not harm children who experienced it >>>>>Bill Putney > > >>>>Honestly, i did not know that. > > >>>You still don't. You have Bill's assertion that it happened; let's >>>see if he can back up his claim by producing the study. > > >>Yet it's documented. But that won't be acknowledged. And you just proved me right. > Well, certainly it won't be acknowledged until you show us where you found > that documentation. The assertion wasn't documented in your post, so for > now it's just your assertion. So I give you the information where you could easily find it. Face it - you aren't intersted in seeing it. You just want to attack me. Go right ahead. So the diversionary issue becomes whether I can document it (which I did) - not whether what I claimed is true or not. Bill Putney (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my adddress with the letter 'x') ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#296
|
|||
|
|||
Daniel J. Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Bill Putney wrote: > > >>linda wrote: > > >>>>>Is that the same APA that published a "scientific" study that said that >>>>>it was found that pediphilia did not harm children who experienced it >>>>>Bill Putney > > >>>>Honestly, i did not know that. > > >>>You still don't. You have Bill's assertion that it happened; let's >>>see if he can back up his claim by producing the study. > > >>Yet it's documented. But that won't be acknowledged. And you just proved me right. > Well, certainly it won't be acknowledged until you show us where you found > that documentation. The assertion wasn't documented in your post, so for > now it's just your assertion. So I give you the information where you could easily find it. Face it - you aren't intersted in seeing it. You just want to attack me. Go right ahead. So the diversionary issue becomes whether I can document it (which I did) - not whether what I claimed is true or not. Bill Putney (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my adddress with the letter 'x') ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#297
|
|||
|
|||
Daniel J. Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Bill Putney wrote: > > >>(they may have >>purged both from their web site by now - haven't checked) > > > Riiiight. They've purged it. And the APA and the UN endorse NAMBLA. > Uh-huh. I said they *may* have purged it - not sure - don't really care - it may still be there. Like I said, UN endorsing NAMBLA and pedophilia is documented - not only here, but in the Congressional Record. All you need to do is check out Wikipedia on NAMBLA - look at the whole blog on that - you can see where it went back and forth on including and deleting the UN debacle - somebody didn't want it known, but you can't erase the Congressional Record which collaborates what was taken out otf the Wiki article - **IF** you want to know the truth, which looks pretty doubtful. > I think your foil hat might be leaking space rays. Might want to look into > a replacement. Whatever. Choose to be ignorant Lloyd - errr - I mean, Daniel. Bill Putney (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my adddress with the letter 'x') ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#298
|
|||
|
|||
Daniel J. Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Bill Putney wrote: > > >>(they may have >>purged both from their web site by now - haven't checked) > > > Riiiight. They've purged it. And the APA and the UN endorse NAMBLA. > Uh-huh. I said they *may* have purged it - not sure - don't really care - it may still be there. Like I said, UN endorsing NAMBLA and pedophilia is documented - not only here, but in the Congressional Record. All you need to do is check out Wikipedia on NAMBLA - look at the whole blog on that - you can see where it went back and forth on including and deleting the UN debacle - somebody didn't want it known, but you can't erase the Congressional Record which collaborates what was taken out otf the Wiki article - **IF** you want to know the truth, which looks pretty doubtful. > I think your foil hat might be leaking space rays. Might want to look into > a replacement. Whatever. Choose to be ignorant Lloyd - errr - I mean, Daniel. Bill Putney (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my adddress with the letter 'x') ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#299
|
|||
|
|||
linda wrote:
> Bill Putney wrote: > >> linda wrote: >> >> >>> The American Psychological Association issued a warning on August >>> 14, 1997, against the "psychological terrorism" of the Ex-Gay >>> "reparative therapy" movement, which the APA said reveals an "intense >>> bias against gay people." >> >> >> >> Is that the same APA that published a "scientific" study that said >> that it was found that pediphilia did not harm children who >> experienced it, and later denounced same after (and only after) those >> in the scientific community and the public raised a big stink about >> the pseudo science that they were promoting for political reasons? >> Why yes - I believe it was the very same APA. > > Honestly, i did not know that.. Ask a victim of pedophilia if it > affected them (from personal experience, i can tell you that i am not > sure if it changed me, because i don't know how i would be if it hadn't > happened). I don't know - it could explain a lot - the victim mentallity and everything else. So you're saying that your position on pedophilia is "I don't know what the big fuss is about pedophilia - it ain't so bad."? It does appear to be one of the last taboos that hasn't been successfully attacked yet in the 21st century U.S. - though there are certainly those that are trying - it's another one of those "slippery slope" things, and so therefore liberals don't allow it to be discussed in serious public forums. Put me on record as being against pedophilia - it's extremely damaging. IOW - it's a bad thing. Bill Putney (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my adddress with the letter 'x') ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#300
|
|||
|
|||
linda wrote:
> Bill Putney wrote: > >> linda wrote: >> >> >>> The American Psychological Association issued a warning on August >>> 14, 1997, against the "psychological terrorism" of the Ex-Gay >>> "reparative therapy" movement, which the APA said reveals an "intense >>> bias against gay people." >> >> >> >> Is that the same APA that published a "scientific" study that said >> that it was found that pediphilia did not harm children who >> experienced it, and later denounced same after (and only after) those >> in the scientific community and the public raised a big stink about >> the pseudo science that they were promoting for political reasons? >> Why yes - I believe it was the very same APA. > > Honestly, i did not know that.. Ask a victim of pedophilia if it > affected them (from personal experience, i can tell you that i am not > sure if it changed me, because i don't know how i would be if it hadn't > happened). I don't know - it could explain a lot - the victim mentallity and everything else. So you're saying that your position on pedophilia is "I don't know what the big fuss is about pedophilia - it ain't so bad."? It does appear to be one of the last taboos that hasn't been successfully attacked yet in the 21st century U.S. - though there are certainly those that are trying - it's another one of those "slippery slope" things, and so therefore liberals don't allow it to be discussed in serious public forums. Put me on record as being against pedophilia - it's extremely damaging. IOW - it's a bad thing. Bill Putney (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my adddress with the letter 'x') ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________---_gadkypy | Michael Barnes | Driving | 4 | January 4th 05 06:47 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! ___________ mixqec | [email protected] | Chrysler | 37 | November 18th 04 04:18 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________---_ gadkypy | Paul | Antique cars | 3 | November 9th 04 06:54 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!!___________ mixqec | indago | Chrysler | 7 | November 8th 04 05:05 PM |