If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Project for the Next Generation of Vehicles
I remember this around 1994. All I remembered was I was in highschool
and early college, and Al Gore and Bill Clinton were talking about a car that could get 85 mpg. I remember around 1995 seeing news on TV with college researchers building prototypes of cars that got really good gas mileage- they had giant flywheels, electric motors, small engines, etc. The goal of the PNGV was to build a family car within ten years than got 85 mpg in ten years. I figured they'd be just around the corner. Who knows, maybe my first or second car would be one. Well, it turns out the whole thing was a giant smokescreen. During this ten year period from 1994-2004, the American auto industry implemented very little of the improvements from their research. Instead, they created the modern SUV fad, and average miles per gallon actually decreased. And the government, worst of all, gave them over a billion dollars of taxes to play around with, with no accountability in the end. Sure, some money was implemented to study electric battery technology, lighter vehicle design, hybrid powertrains and hydrogen fuel cells, but very little found it's way into real cars. Why does anybody think that the fuel cell technology "Freedom Car" initiative being pushed by George W. Bush is any different? IMO, the American auto industry doesn't deserve one cent until they can actually produce something with the money they already recieved. It's shameful that in 2005 there are only really two or three models of hybrid cars to choose from (the Honda Insight doesn't count, it's a joke- and about to be discontinued), and NONE of the powertrains are American designed. To boot, demand for hybrid cars far exceeds the production, meaning that people who actually want a hybrid car will face long waits and few choices, price gouging, etc. The ONLY reason Toyota is building the Prius is in low numbers is because they obviously don't intend for it to be anything but a marketting device to enhance their image as a "green company" .. If they were serious about hybrids, they would have started rapidly implementing them into all their cars. They've had nearly 4 years to do so. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
You want better mileage? Lower the speed limit. That would also save
thousands of lives a year and billions of $. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Magnulus" > wrote in message ... > I remember this around 1994. All I remembered was I was in highschool > and early college, and Al Gore and Bill Clinton were talking about a car > that could get 85 mpg. I remember around 1995 seeing news on TV with > college researchers building prototypes of cars that got really good gas > mileage- they had giant flywheels, electric motors, small engines, etc. > The goal of the PNGV was to build a family car within ten years than got 85 > mpg in ten years. I figured they'd be just around the corner. Who knows, > maybe my first or second car would be one. > > Well, it turns out the whole thing was a giant smokescreen. During this > ten year period from 1994-2004, the American auto industry implemented very > little of the improvements from their research. Instead, they created the > modern SUV fad, and average miles per gallon actually decreased. And the > government, worst of all, gave them over a billion dollars of taxes to play > around with, with no accountability in the end. Sure, some money was > implemented to study electric battery technology, lighter vehicle design, > hybrid powertrains and hydrogen fuel cells, but very little found it's way > into real cars. > > Why does anybody think that the fuel cell technology "Freedom Car" > initiative being pushed by George W. Bush is any different? IMO, the > American auto industry doesn't deserve one cent until they can actually > produce something with the money they already recieved. That's what we get for putting oil criminals in the whitehouse or one heartbeat from the whitehouse since atleast 1980: Bush I (1980-1992), Gore (1992-2000 - ever hear of Occidental Petroleum? That criminal organization and the Gore family go hand-n-hand ref: http://tinyurl.com/6djvw ) and ofcourse, we have the two criminals currently in that position, Bush II and Cheney. As long as we the suckers keep electing them, don't count on an 85MPG or alternative fueled vehicle or the SUV abomination to pass any time soon. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 04:27:54 -0500, "Magnulus" >
>(the Honda Insight doesn't count, it's a joke- >and about to be discontinued) Okay, why is it a joke? Sure, it's small, but so are a lot of other cars on the market. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On 30 Jan 2005 07:52:58 -0800, "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend"
> >You want better mileage? Lower the speed limit. That would also save >thousands of lives a year and billions of $. You want less pollution from cars and safer highways? Don't make it so easy to get a license. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 11:20:22 -0700, Mike Z. Helm > wrote:
>On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 04:27:54 -0500, "Magnulus" > > >>(the Honda Insight doesn't count, it's a joke- >>and about to be discontinued) > >Okay, why is it a joke? > >Sure, it's small, but so are a lot of other cars on the market. And you notice those small cars are not selling - its the big SUV's you see beside you in the parking lot that are selling. A small anything for the roadway is not the solution to this. We need to be able to haul stuff now that people have all moved out into the country. Kids can't get on their bikes and get to anyplace in town that they need to, they have to be driven. You end up hauling the whole damn little league team, repeatedly and often. You need to haul stuff back from Home Depot today, instead of waiting for it to be delivered Tuesday. And people believe that they can avoid a rollover accident via their superior driving, and will simply crush the other car in any sort of collision if they have a big SUV. Soo... make the SUV's fuel efficient, that's the answer. Dave Head |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Mike Z. Helm" > wrote in message ... > > Okay, why is it a joke? > > Sure, it's small, but so are a lot of other cars on the market. The Honda Insight I suppose is OK but it's fairly small and lightweight- the handling and feel of the car also isn't as solid as some of the "larger" hybrids, like the Honda Civic. It also will only hold two people and the trunk will not hold many groceries. Honda said they are either going to ditch the car next year or go with a big redesign. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Head" > wrote in message ... > And you notice those small cars are not selling - its the big SUV's you see > beside you in the parking lot that are selling. > If the hybrid cars weren't selling, then the demand wouldn't be outstripping the supply. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Scott en Aztlán" > wrote in message ... > On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 04:27:54 -0500, "Magnulus" > > wrote: > > > On the contrary! > > They merely applied that research in the ways that would sell the most > cars - by making cars more powerful. Instead of increasing the > efficiency of a wimpy car and making it get 85 MPG, they increased the > efficiency of a V8 engine and gave it 500 horsepower. Production > automobiles roll out of the factory today with more rear-wheel > horsepower than at any time in history - including the "musclecar" era > of the 60s and early 70s. > > -- > Sloth Kills! > http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/ Of course you are correct Scott. The Honda Civic model sold in Japan comes close to achieving 80 MPG (from what I've read). However, the car only has a 82 horsepower engine in it (comparable in power to many 1980's cars that were sold here in the US). Today's 200HP mid-size sedans get the same mileage as a early 1980's sub-compact hatchbacks that had a 80HP engine in them. So, you're right on the mark. The US buyer wants power over economy these days. So, naturally, that is what the manufacturers produce. Now, one could argue that the Japanese model and the US model on opposite extremes and there is a reasonable median that achieved both adequate power at reasonable economy. But when economy isn't important to people, why bother with it? Makes sense if I was making cars (and wanted to make a profit). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SN65 project | Robert Julian Jr. | Ford Mustang | 31 | April 4th 05 02:58 PM |
NTSB Wants Black Boxes in Passenger Vehicles | MoPar Man | Chrysler | 62 | January 14th 05 02:44 PM |
Salvage Registration | [email protected] | Technology | 2 | December 30th 04 02:10 AM |