If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#181
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 00:30:32 -0500, "Daniel J. Stern"
> wrote: >On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, indago wrote: > >> 041108 2142 - Wound Up posted: > >> > Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the >> > target of hatred > >> Well, then, maybe derision??? > >"Maybe"...? Y'think? > >Turn on your TV set during primetime any night of the week. Scarcely a >sitcom episode goes by without they don't make clunky, hamhanded innuendo >or outright laughtrack-enhanced punchlines at the expense of >cardigan-wearing, mincing, oh-so-coiffed fag-stereotypes, and entire >series are built on same, e.g. "Will and Grace" or "Queer Eye for the >Straight Guy" or "Queer as Folk". > >One doesn't have to work very hard to imagine how black people felt when >they saw such as "What's Happenin?" on television. Hollywood, for their >part, is glibly contrite for years of making money off black stereotypes, >but they evidently have zero problem doing the selfsame thing with gays >right now, today. > >Gandhi said of social change: "First they ignore you, then they ridicule >and denounce you, then they debate you, then you win." > >-DS There's a group that come in for much more derision than homosexuals on TV - the white male. All you need to do to see this is to watch sitcoms and advertisements. The poor bumbling white guy is the butt of so many jokes it's obvious to anyone who watches. But it's OK, because, after all, they are just, well, there. Bill Funk Change "g" to "a" |
Ads |
#182
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 00:30:32 -0500, "Daniel J. Stern"
> wrote: >On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, indago wrote: > >> 041108 2142 - Wound Up posted: > >> > Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the >> > target of hatred > >> Well, then, maybe derision??? > >"Maybe"...? Y'think? > >Turn on your TV set during primetime any night of the week. Scarcely a >sitcom episode goes by without they don't make clunky, hamhanded innuendo >or outright laughtrack-enhanced punchlines at the expense of >cardigan-wearing, mincing, oh-so-coiffed fag-stereotypes, and entire >series are built on same, e.g. "Will and Grace" or "Queer Eye for the >Straight Guy" or "Queer as Folk". > >One doesn't have to work very hard to imagine how black people felt when >they saw such as "What's Happenin?" on television. Hollywood, for their >part, is glibly contrite for years of making money off black stereotypes, >but they evidently have zero problem doing the selfsame thing with gays >right now, today. > >Gandhi said of social change: "First they ignore you, then they ridicule >and denounce you, then they debate you, then you win." > >-DS There's a group that come in for much more derision than homosexuals on TV - the white male. All you need to do to see this is to watch sitcoms and advertisements. The poor bumbling white guy is the butt of so many jokes it's obvious to anyone who watches. But it's OK, because, after all, they are just, well, there. Bill Funk Change "g" to "a" |
#183
|
|||
|
|||
linda wrote:
> Daniel J. Stern wrote: > >> On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, linda wrote: >> >> >>>>> Shut up Daniel, I know a number of gays that supported Bush. >> >> >> >>>> And this proves...what, now? >> >> >> >>> Daniel, i get fussed at by the rest of the guys for being OT, >> >> >> >> We all do. >> >> >>> don't think that this has anything to do with cars, does it? >> >> >> >> Nope. >> > > TO ALL: > Homosexuality is an accepted lifestyle nowadays with a proven biological > causation. What proof? Matt |
#184
|
|||
|
|||
linda wrote:
> Daniel J. Stern wrote: > >> On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, linda wrote: >> >> >>>>> Shut up Daniel, I know a number of gays that supported Bush. >> >> >> >>>> And this proves...what, now? >> >> >> >>> Daniel, i get fussed at by the rest of the guys for being OT, >> >> >> >> We all do. >> >> >>> don't think that this has anything to do with cars, does it? >> >> >> >> Nope. >> > > TO ALL: > Homosexuality is an accepted lifestyle nowadays with a proven biological > causation. What proof? Matt |
#185
|
|||
|
|||
Matt Whiting wrote:
> linda wrote: > >> Daniel J. Stern wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, linda wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>> Shut up Daniel, I know a number of gays that supported Bush. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>> And this proves...what, now? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Daniel, i get fussed at by the rest of the guys for being OT, >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> We all do. >>> >>> >>>> don't think that this has anything to do with cars, does it? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Nope. >>> >> >> TO ALL: >> Homosexuality is an accepted lifestyle nowadays with a proven >> biological causation. > > > What proof? > > Matt > what proof do you have against it? |
#186
|
|||
|
|||
Matt Whiting wrote:
> linda wrote: > >> Daniel J. Stern wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, linda wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>> Shut up Daniel, I know a number of gays that supported Bush. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>> And this proves...what, now? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Daniel, i get fussed at by the rest of the guys for being OT, >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> We all do. >>> >>> >>>> don't think that this has anything to do with cars, does it? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Nope. >>> >> >> TO ALL: >> Homosexuality is an accepted lifestyle nowadays with a proven >> biological causation. > > > What proof? > > Matt > what proof do you have against it? |
#187
|
|||
|
|||
Jack wrote:
> Eric Gironda wrote: > > > Last time I checked "marriage" was not a > >> right the people of this country are granted. > > Last time you checked you had no comprehension of what the Constitution > is, and you still don't. > > Our government does not grant us rights, nor does the Constitution > itself, it merely recognizes them. The Constitution limits the > government, not the People. > > Too bad we have let it be trashed. Amen to that. I wish I thought Gonzalez would be an improvement over Ashcroft, but I don't. |
#188
|
|||
|
|||
Jack wrote:
> Eric Gironda wrote: > > > Last time I checked "marriage" was not a > >> right the people of this country are granted. > > Last time you checked you had no comprehension of what the Constitution > is, and you still don't. > > Our government does not grant us rights, nor does the Constitution > itself, it merely recognizes them. The Constitution limits the > government, not the People. > > Too bad we have let it be trashed. Amen to that. I wish I thought Gonzalez would be an improvement over Ashcroft, but I don't. |
#189
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bill wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 00:30:32 -0500, "Daniel J. Stern" > > wrote: > >>On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, indago wrote: >> >>>041108 2142 - Wound Up posted: >> >>>>Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the >>>>target of hatred >> >>>Well, then, maybe derision??? >> >>"Maybe"...? Y'think? >> >>Turn on your TV set during primetime any night of the week. Scarcely a >>sitcom episode goes by without they don't make clunky, hamhanded innuendo >>or outright laughtrack-enhanced punchlines at the expense of >>cardigan-wearing, mincing, oh-so-coiffed fag-stereotypes, and entire >>series are built on same, e.g. "Will and Grace" or "Queer Eye for the >>Straight Guy" or "Queer as Folk". >> >>One doesn't have to work very hard to imagine how black people felt when >>they saw such as "What's Happenin?" on television. Hollywood, for their >>part, is glibly contrite for years of making money off black stereotypes, >>but they evidently have zero problem doing the selfsame thing with gays >>right now, today. >> >>Gandhi said of social change: "First they ignore you, then they ridicule >>and denounce you, then they debate you, then you win." >> >>-DS > > There's a group that come in for much more derision than homosexuals > on TV - the white male. > All you need to do to see this is to watch sitcoms and advertisements. > The poor bumbling white guy is the butt of so many jokes it's obvious > to anyone who watches. > But it's OK, because, after all, they are just, well, there. Feeling sorry for yourself, BB? Adult white guys still seem to be running things across the USA. |
#190
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bill wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 00:30:32 -0500, "Daniel J. Stern" > > wrote: > >>On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, indago wrote: >> >>>041108 2142 - Wound Up posted: >> >>>>Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the >>>>target of hatred >> >>>Well, then, maybe derision??? >> >>"Maybe"...? Y'think? >> >>Turn on your TV set during primetime any night of the week. Scarcely a >>sitcom episode goes by without they don't make clunky, hamhanded innuendo >>or outright laughtrack-enhanced punchlines at the expense of >>cardigan-wearing, mincing, oh-so-coiffed fag-stereotypes, and entire >>series are built on same, e.g. "Will and Grace" or "Queer Eye for the >>Straight Guy" or "Queer as Folk". >> >>One doesn't have to work very hard to imagine how black people felt when >>they saw such as "What's Happenin?" on television. Hollywood, for their >>part, is glibly contrite for years of making money off black stereotypes, >>but they evidently have zero problem doing the selfsame thing with gays >>right now, today. >> >>Gandhi said of social change: "First they ignore you, then they ridicule >>and denounce you, then they debate you, then you win." >> >>-DS > > There's a group that come in for much more derision than homosexuals > on TV - the white male. > All you need to do to see this is to watch sitcoms and advertisements. > The poor bumbling white guy is the butt of so many jokes it's obvious > to anyone who watches. > But it's OK, because, after all, they are just, well, there. Feeling sorry for yourself, BB? Adult white guys still seem to be running things across the USA. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________---_gadkypy | Michael Barnes | Driving | 4 | January 4th 05 06:47 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! ___________ mixqec | [email protected] | Chrysler | 37 | November 18th 04 04:18 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________---_ gadkypy | Paul | Antique cars | 3 | November 9th 04 06:54 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!!___________ mixqec | indago | Chrysler | 7 | November 8th 04 05:05 PM |