If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
High brake fluid level?
Any opinions.
Took my 2004 Subaru Impreza WRX for a brake inspection and fluid (brake and clutch) flush. The shop performed the service with 4-1/2 250ml cans of Motorex DOT 5.1 fluid that I brought in myself. They left me one half-empty can, which I figured could be used if I needed to top off in a week. When I got home, I checked the fluid level in the resevoirs. The engine and brakes were warm and the car was level. I had a hard time figuring out where the level was. The Motorex fluid has virtually no color, while others used in my cars have been amber, brownish, or purpleish. I finally spotted where the level was - fairly high over the max line. Would it be worth it to remove some of the fluid with a turkey baster? I know the level might go down as the pads wear. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I don't think is a problem, but why did you have this done on a 1 year old
vehicle? "y_p_w" > wrote in message oups.com... > Any opinions. > > Took my 2004 Subaru Impreza WRX for a brake inspection and fluid > (brake and clutch) flush. The shop performed the service with 4-1/2 > 250ml cans of Motorex DOT 5.1 fluid that I brought in myself. They > left me one half-empty can, which I figured could be used if I > needed to top off in a week. > > When I got home, I checked the fluid level in the resevoirs. The > engine and brakes were warm and the car was level. I had a hard time > figuring out where the level was. The Motorex fluid has virtually no > color, while others used in my cars have been amber, brownish, or > purpleish. > > I finally spotted where the level was - fairly high over the max line. > Would it be worth it to remove some of the fluid with a turkey baster? > I know the level might go down as the pads wear. > > ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Shep wrote:
> I don't think is a problem, but why did you have this done on a > 1 year old vehicle? I've always had it done every 15K miles, just as a preventative measure. I figure I'll have it done every 15K miles and never over 2 years. Besides that, I know that brake fluid absorbs moisture and the car was built 9/03. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Shep" > wrote in :
> I don't think is a problem, but why did you have this done on a 1 year > old vehicle? Because it's an excellent, superb idea. Annual fluid changes will see your master cylinder last virtually forever. I did (and do) the same thing. -- TeGGeR® The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
TeGGeR I appreciate your opinion here, but almost all manufacturer's say
that this is unecessary unless the fluid is contaminated, you are right it cannot hurt, but issues with bleeding the system can crop up on some vehicles. "TeGGeR®" > wrote in message ... > "Shep" > wrote in : > >> I don't think is a problem, but why did you have this done on a 1 year >> old vehicle? > > > Because it's an excellent, superb idea. > > Annual fluid changes will see your master cylinder last virtually forever. > I did (and do) the same thing. > > -- > TeGGeR® > > The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ > www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Shep wrote:
> TeGGeR I appreciate your opinion here, but almost all manufacturer's > say that this is unecessary unless the fluid is contaminated, you > are right it cannot hurt, but issues with bleeding the system can > crop up on some vehicles. Most Japanese carmakers recommend brake fluid changes in the 2 to 3 year range for "normal" service. My Subaru warranty booklet recommends it every 30K miles or 30 months. Strangely enough, Toyota doesn't have any recommendation. I'd be worried about going the life of a car with the brake fluid below the DOT 3 wet boiling point. It's not simply that moisture in the brake fluid is going to lead to contamination, but also that the boiling point has gone down as a result. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"y_p_w" > wrote in
ups.com: > Shep wrote: >> TeGGeR I appreciate your opinion here, but almost all manufacturer's >> say that this is unecessary unless the fluid is contaminated, you >> are right it cannot hurt, but issues with bleeding the system can >> crop up on some vehicles. > > Most Japanese carmakers recommend brake fluid changes in the 2 to 3 > year range for "normal" service. My Subaru warranty booklet recommends > it every 30K miles or 30 months. Strangely enough, Toyota doesn't > have any recommendation. > > I'd be worried about going the life of a car with the brake fluid > below the DOT 3 wet boiling point. It's not simply that moisture > in the brake fluid is going to lead to contamination, but also that > the boiling point has gone down as a result. > Either way, it's an excellent idea to replace the fluid once per year, especially if you live (as I do) in an area with high humidity. It's cheap, too. You are to be commended for paying appropriate attention to your brake components. Would that others thought as you. -- TeGGeR® The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
TeGGeR=AE wrote:
> "y_p_w" > wrote in > Either way, it's an excellent idea to replace the fluid once per > year, especially if you live (as I do) in an area with high humidity. > > It's cheap, too. I was charged .5 hour labor for the flush. Not super cheap, but less than the dealer would have charged. > You are to be commended for paying appropriate attention to your > brake components. Would that others thought as you. I certainly have this done on my own cars. Which reminds me that I should probably insist on getting my folks to do the same with their cars. My dad's '96 Regal hasn't gotten a brake fluid flush yet. The folks' Camry is a 2001. If there's any corrosion, then it's probably too late. It still seems like a good idea to get that "wet" brake fluid out of there. That Buick stops like crap in the first place. It doesn't need wet fluid to make it worse. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 | Dr. David Zatz | Chrysler | 5 | March 6th 05 05:29 AM |
strange brake problem | Nadia | Audi | 9 | March 2nd 05 07:38 PM |
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 | Dr. David Zatz | Chrysler | 3 | February 18th 05 05:34 AM |
Transmission fluid avalibility | Alan W. Blackmon | Dodge | 14 | July 10th 04 06:17 AM |