|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
January 7th 05, 11:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
william lynch wrote:
> "Speeders haven't killed anyone;". > > Proposal for goofyest statement of 2005. Not at all. He's merely reporting the true fact that, if anyone gets hurt, then laws a lot more serious than speeding were being broken, and those laws are all we need for proper safety. Speeding per se is a victimless crime. A good penalty for _enforcing_ speeding laws would be 20 years. 
|
| Ads |
|
#22
January 7th 05, 11:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote: > LETS STOP BEING CRIMINAL CODDLERS. Hear Hear! Let's prosecute Tubby Kennedy for murder, and Bill Clinton for lying under oath!!!
|
|
#23
January 7th 05, 11:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote: > LETS STOP BEING CRIMINAL CODDLERS. Hear Hear! Let's prosecute Tubby Kennedy for murder, and Bill Clinton for lying under oath!!!
|
|
#24
January 8th 05, 01:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kevin,
The original poster is a well known troll in the political groups. It started posting to r.a.d about 4 years ago. It recently started cross posting its crap to m.t.r. The best thing to do is killfile it.
|
|
#25
January 8th 05, 01:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kevin,
The original poster is a well known troll in the political groups. It started posting to r.a.d about 4 years ago. It recently started cross posting its crap to m.t.r. The best thing to do is killfile it.
|
|
#26
January 8th 05, 01:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
John David Galt wrote:
> A good penalty for _enforcing_ speeding laws would be 20 years. What do you suggest the penalty should be for those who enact them? 
|
|
#27
January 8th 05, 01:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
John David Galt wrote:
> A good penalty for _enforcing_ speeding laws would be 20 years. What do you suggest the penalty should be for those who enact them?
|
|
#28
January 8th 05, 01:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Arif Khokar wrote:
> John David Galt wrote: > >> A good penalty for _enforcing_ speeding laws would be 20 years. > > > What do you suggest the penalty should be for those who enact them? To be forced to obey them for the rest of their natural lives. If they can't or won't comply, they will be chauffeured by a driver that will. I would certainly volunteer a day a month for such duty. It would be my pleasure to demonstrate just how asinine our speed limit laws can be. nate ObWhine: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=4517044207 -- replace "fly" with "com" to reply. http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel
|
|
#29
January 8th 05, 01:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Arif Khokar wrote:
> John David Galt wrote: > >> A good penalty for _enforcing_ speeding laws would be 20 years. > > > What do you suggest the penalty should be for those who enact them? To be forced to obey them for the rest of their natural lives. If they can't or won't comply, they will be chauffeured by a driver that will. I would certainly volunteer a day a month for such duty. It would be my pleasure to demonstrate just how asinine our speed limit laws can be. nate ObWhine: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=4517044207 -- replace "fly" with "com" to reply. http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel
|
|
#30
January 8th 05, 01:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Speed, in and of itself, isn't the problem. Reckless driving is the
problem; the two terms are not synonyms. That the majority of the population is incapable of making the distinction doesn't change the fact. Consider the autobahn, and how much faster well educated and well trained drivers are capable of operating their vehicles safely at speeds that would bewilder the typical American driver.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
