If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#191
|
|||
|
|||
jaybird wrote:
> "L Sternn" > wrote in message > ... > >>On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:15:24 GMT, "Skip Elliott Bowman" > wrote: >> >> >>>"Scott en Aztlán" > wrote in message ... >>> >>>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:19:22 -0500, "Cory Dunkle" > >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Cops so often forget that they are _PUBLIC SERVICE_ officers. They serve >>>>>the >>>>>public, and the public pays them for that service. They serve every >>>>>single >>>>>person out on the streets and sidewalks. Even if they suspect that >>>>>person >>>>>of >>>>>something the cop still needs to treat that person with the utmost >>>>>respect >>>>>and courtesy. >>>>> >>>>>Anyhow, the world would be a better place without all the ass holes like >>>>>this pig working on the force. >>>> >>>>Your hypocrisy is dripping off my screen and onto my keyboard. >>>> >>>>So let me ask you a question, Cory: why do you expect courtesy and >>>>respect from the police when you refuse to extend thst same courtesy >>>>and respect to them? Do you believe that paying the officer's salary >>>>entitles you to treat them with disrespect and hatred? >>> >>>I don't believe that anybody deserves to be treated with disrespect or >>>hatred just because they are a LEO. >> >>I agree, but jaybird's defense of this piece of **** is really making >>me wonder why. > > > I'll tell you exactly why. All you have to do is ask. The only thing I'm > defending the cop for is against losing his job. I have said already that > is comment was inappropriate and so was hanging up on the caller. I think > 15 days off is more than appropriate punishment for an 18 year veteran with > no record of previous disciplinary action. > Even when it quite possibly (for all he knew at the time) could have resulted in the unnecessary death of a civilian? I dunno, at my job, if I screwed up where a customer got ****ed off or something I'd expect a stern talking to and maybe a couple days off. If it resulted in someone's death, I'd *expect* to get fired, and indeed it would be inevitable as the company would want to minimize its exposure to lawsuits. Tenure is irrelevant - and that's the way it *should* be. nate -- replace "fly" with "com" to reply. http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel |
Ads |
#192
|
|||
|
|||
"Timberwoof" > wrote in message ... > In article >, > "B. Peg" > wrote: > >> > "jaybird" wrote: >> > Is there another one somewhere supporting the disciplinary action he's >> > already received as being adequate? I'm not trying to undermine your >> > cause, there are just some of us who think an 18 year veteran with a >> > spotless record should be disciplined rather than asked to resign for >> > making an inappropriate comment and action by hanging up on the caller. >> >> What if you called 911 on your family member and got the same response? >> "Oh, it's okay. He was just having a bad day. He was a good cop for so >> long." Gimme a frickin' break! >> >> Fwiw, what relevance does a spotless record have? From your logic, then >> why >> arrest any first time offender? After all, they were good citizen for so >> long. > > Ooooobviously, this is a compleeeetely different case. When a *citizen* > commits > a crime, that's always bad, and we should lock 'em up and throw away the > key. > Gotta pusnish them properly and make an example of them ti keeo everybody > else > in line. Now back up just a second. If a citizen commits a crime for the first time they don't lock them up and throw away the key. If it's an offense other than a serious felony like murder, rape, etc., then the person doesn't always get jail time. Most often they'll receive probation or a light sentence. > > But when an Officer Of The Law makes a mistake, that's because they're > only > human, and we should have sympathy for all the stress they endure day in > and day > out. > > (For the irony-impaired, I was joking.) Understood, but we're not asking for sympathy. Certainly discipline him but don't fire him. -- --- jaybird --- I am not the cause of your problems. My actions are the result of your actions. Your life is not my fault. paneling in the officers' quarters. |
#193
|
|||
|
|||
"Bo Raxo" > wrote in message news > > "jaybird" > wrote in message > ... >> >> "Tim Kreitz" > wrote in message >> oups.com... >> > Dave Swanson wrote: >> > >> >> There are thousands of unemployed >> >> citizens who could perform much better than this >> >> pitiful asshole. >> > >> > Sign the petition to have him fired: >> > >> > <http://www.petitiononline.com/Peasley/petition.html> >> > >> > There are thousands of signatures thus far. Add yours and pass the URL >> > along. >> > >> > My article: >> > > <http://superbikeblog.blogspot.com/20...ists-cops-only > -care.html> >> >> Is there another one somewhere supporting the disciplinary action he's >> already received as being adequate? I'm not trying to undermine your > cause, >> there are just some of us who think an 18 year veteran with a spotless >> record should be disciplined rather than asked to resign for making an >> inappropriate comment and action by hanging up on the caller. >> > > If the trooper had just been having a bad day or this was otherwise out of > character, I would think he'd have the sense to apologize. In person. > How > hard would it be to go down to the hospital and tell the injured man that > he's sorry he was rude to the guy that called in the accident, and is glad > the motorcyclist is all right? Maybe call the press and say the same > thing? > > But I've news.googled and I don't see anything of the sort. Which makes > me > think this 18 year veteran of the force is a prick. > > BTW, "spotless record"? Perhaps, but you're just assuming. Nope, not assuming. The report quoted his supervisors as saying that he had no previous disciplinary action over 18 years of service. -- --- jaybird --- I am not the cause of your problems. My actions are the result of your actions. Your life is not my fault. |
#194
|
|||
|
|||
"jaybird" > wrote in message ... > > > Nope, not assuming. The report quoted his supervisors as saying that he had > no previous disciplinary action over 18 years of service. > Not to put too fine a point on it, but first, perhaps his supervisors are covering their ass or trying to stick up for a colleague they like. Second, "no disciplinary action" means they didn't punish him for anything. Doesn't mean he hasn't been a rude jerk before, or that people haven't filed complaints. It doesn't ring a small little warning light that this trooper was on 911 operator duty? I don't know about other places, but my understanding in my home town is that this happens when you've been restricted to desk duty, for any of many reasons. |
#195
|
|||
|
|||
"Nate Nagel" > wrote in message ... > jaybird wrote: > >> "L Sternn" > wrote in message >> ... >> >>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:15:24 GMT, "Skip Elliott Bowman" > wrote: >>> >>> >>>>"Scott en Aztlán" > wrote in message m... >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:19:22 -0500, "Cory Dunkle" > >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Cops so often forget that they are _PUBLIC SERVICE_ officers. They >>>>>>serve >>>>>>the >>>>>>public, and the public pays them for that service. They serve every >>>>>>single >>>>>>person out on the streets and sidewalks. Even if they suspect that >>>>>>person >>>>>>of >>>>>>something the cop still needs to treat that person with the utmost >>>>>>respect >>>>>>and courtesy. >>>>>> >>>>>>Anyhow, the world would be a better place without all the ass holes >>>>>>like >>>>>>this pig working on the force. >>>>> >>>>>Your hypocrisy is dripping off my screen and onto my keyboard. >>>>> >>>>>So let me ask you a question, Cory: why do you expect courtesy and >>>>>respect from the police when you refuse to extend thst same courtesy >>>>>and respect to them? Do you believe that paying the officer's salary >>>>>entitles you to treat them with disrespect and hatred? >>>> >>>>I don't believe that anybody deserves to be treated with disrespect or >>>>hatred just because they are a LEO. >>> >>>I agree, but jaybird's defense of this piece of **** is really making >>>me wonder why. >> >> >> I'll tell you exactly why. All you have to do is ask. The only thing >> I'm defending the cop for is against losing his job. I have said already >> that is comment was inappropriate and so was hanging up on the caller. I >> think 15 days off is more than appropriate punishment for an 18 year >> veteran with no record of previous disciplinary action. >> > > Even when it quite possibly (for all he knew at the time) could have > resulted in the unnecessary death of a civilian? > > I dunno, at my job, if I screwed up where a customer got ****ed off or > something I'd expect a stern talking to and maybe a couple days off. If > it resulted in someone's death, I'd *expect* to get fired, and indeed it > would be inevitable as the company would want to minimize its exposure to > lawsuits. Tenure is irrelevant - and that's the way it *should* be. I guess we'd have to put it into perspective then. His inaction was not to deliberately kill someone. He had no idea the extent of the injuries, nor were the injuries his fault. The guy could've died no matter what anyone did which is pretty much what happened. At the most his inaction would've delayed emergency response by the time it takes to make 3 phone calls but his bosses were quoted as saying there was no delay. -- --- jaybird --- I am not the cause of your problems. My actions are the result of your actions. Your life is not my fault. |
#196
|
|||
|
|||
In article >,
"jaybird" > wrote: > "Nate Nagel" > wrote in message > ... > > jaybird wrote: > > > >> "L Sternn" > wrote in message > >> ... > >> > >>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:15:24 GMT, "Skip Elliott Bowman" > > wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>"Scott en Aztlán" > wrote in message > m... > >>>> > >>>>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:19:22 -0500, "Cory Dunkle" > > >>>>>wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>Cops so often forget that they are _PUBLIC SERVICE_ officers. They > >>>>>>serve > >>>>>>the > >>>>>>public, and the public pays them for that service. They serve every > >>>>>>single > >>>>>>person out on the streets and sidewalks. Even if they suspect that > >>>>>>person > >>>>>>of > >>>>>>something the cop still needs to treat that person with the utmost > >>>>>>respect > >>>>>>and courtesy. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Anyhow, the world would be a better place without all the ass holes > >>>>>>like > >>>>>>this pig working on the force. > >>>>> > >>>>>Your hypocrisy is dripping off my screen and onto my keyboard. > >>>>> > >>>>>So let me ask you a question, Cory: why do you expect courtesy and > >>>>>respect from the police when you refuse to extend thst same courtesy > >>>>>and respect to them? Do you believe that paying the officer's salary > >>>>>entitles you to treat them with disrespect and hatred? > >>>> > >>>>I don't believe that anybody deserves to be treated with disrespect or > >>>>hatred just because they are a LEO. > >>> > >>>I agree, but jaybird's defense of this piece of **** is really making > >>>me wonder why. > >> > >> > >> I'll tell you exactly why. All you have to do is ask. The only thing > >> I'm defending the cop for is against losing his job. I have said already > >> that is comment was inappropriate and so was hanging up on the caller. I > >> think 15 days off is more than appropriate punishment for an 18 year > >> veteran with no record of previous disciplinary action. > >> > > > > Even when it quite possibly (for all he knew at the time) could have > > resulted in the unnecessary death of a civilian? > > > > I dunno, at my job, if I screwed up where a customer got ****ed off or > > something I'd expect a stern talking to and maybe a couple days off. If > > it resulted in someone's death, I'd *expect* to get fired, and indeed it > > would be inevitable as the company would want to minimize its exposure to > > lawsuits. Tenure is irrelevant - and that's the way it *should* be. > > I guess we'd have to put it into perspective then. His inaction was not to > deliberately kill someone. He had no idea the extent of the injuries, nor > were the injuries his fault. The guy could've died no matter what anyone > did which is pretty much what happened. At the most his inaction would've > delayed emergency response by the time it takes to make 3 phone calls but > his bosses were quoted as saying there was no delay. You're a police officer, yet you seem strangely unfamiliar with the concept of negligent homicide. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia "If you raise the ceiling 4 feet, move the fireplace from that wall to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard." |
#197
|
|||
|
|||
jaybird wrote:
> "Nate Nagel" > wrote in message > ... > >>jaybird wrote: >> >> >>>"L Sternn" > wrote in message ... >>> >>> >>>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:15:24 GMT, "Skip Elliott Bowman" > wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>"Scott en Aztlán" > wrote in message om... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:19:22 -0500, "Cory Dunkle" > >>>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>Cops so often forget that they are _PUBLIC SERVICE_ officers. They >>>>>>>serve >>>>>>>the >>>>>>>public, and the public pays them for that service. They serve every >>>>>>>single >>>>>>>person out on the streets and sidewalks. Even if they suspect that >>>>>>>person >>>>>>>of >>>>>>>something the cop still needs to treat that person with the utmost >>>>>>>respect >>>>>>>and courtesy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Anyhow, the world would be a better place without all the ass holes >>>>>>>like >>>>>>>this pig working on the force. >>>>>> >>>>>>Your hypocrisy is dripping off my screen and onto my keyboard. >>>>>> >>>>>>So let me ask you a question, Cory: why do you expect courtesy and >>>>>>respect from the police when you refuse to extend thst same courtesy >>>>>>and respect to them? Do you believe that paying the officer's salary >>>>>>entitles you to treat them with disrespect and hatred? >>>>> >>>>>I don't believe that anybody deserves to be treated with disrespect or >>>>>hatred just because they are a LEO. >>>> >>>>I agree, but jaybird's defense of this piece of **** is really making >>>>me wonder why. >>> >>> >>>I'll tell you exactly why. All you have to do is ask. The only thing >>>I'm defending the cop for is against losing his job. I have said already >>>that is comment was inappropriate and so was hanging up on the caller. I >>>think 15 days off is more than appropriate punishment for an 18 year >>>veteran with no record of previous disciplinary action. >>> >> >>Even when it quite possibly (for all he knew at the time) could have >>resulted in the unnecessary death of a civilian? >> >>I dunno, at my job, if I screwed up where a customer got ****ed off or >>something I'd expect a stern talking to and maybe a couple days off. If >>it resulted in someone's death, I'd *expect* to get fired, and indeed it >>would be inevitable as the company would want to minimize its exposure to >>lawsuits. Tenure is irrelevant - and that's the way it *should* be. > > > I guess we'd have to put it into perspective then. His inaction was not to > deliberately kill someone. He had no idea the extent of the injuries, nor > were the injuries his fault. The guy could've died no matter what anyone > did which is pretty much what happened. At the most his inaction would've > delayed emergency response by the time it takes to make 3 phone calls but > his bosses were quoted as saying there was no delay. > No, YOU need to put it in perspective. This is not a little screw up, this is an action with life and death consequences. (yeah, we know that response time "wasn't delayed" but it sure could have been.) The guy needs to go. At the very minimum a permanent transfer to a position that has no interaction with the public and no emergency response involvement. nate -- replace "fly" with "com" to reply. http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel |
#198
|
|||
|
|||
Scott en Aztlán wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 04:19:55 -0500, Nate Nagel > > wrote: > > >>>I'll tell you exactly why. All you have to do is ask. The only thing I'm >>>defending the cop for is against losing his job. I have said already that >>>is comment was inappropriate and so was hanging up on the caller. I think >>>15 days off is more than appropriate punishment for an 18 year veteran with >>>no record of previous disciplinary action. >> >>Even when it quite possibly (for all he knew at the time) could have >>resulted in the unnecessary death of a civilian? > > > If I shoot you with a gun, that's Murder. > > If I shoot AT you with a gun, and miss, or if I hit you but you don't > die, that's Attempted Murder. > > Different crimes, different punishments. > > If the civilian had died, then of course the trooper's punishment > should be harsher than a mere suspension. The fact remains that > emergency services were summoned with no reduction in response time, > which lessens the severity of his offense. > I don't think a suspension from duty is appropriate even due to the lesser consequences. It certainly wouldn't be in the private sector. nate -- replace "fly" with "com" to reply. http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel |
#199
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 07:42:18 GMT, Sir Lex > wrote:
>Car wrote: > >> From the Hartford Courant >> >> Trooper Suspended 15 Days >> >> Response To 911 Call Called Inappropriate >> > >The officers response was extremely inappropriate, but seeing as had >been in the force for 18 years without previous issues, the punishment >he got was good enough. Firing him would be a knee jerk reaction. I >don't know what US troopers pay is like, but I'd imagine three weeks pay >amounts to well over $1000, which is a pretty significant penalty. I >doubt he'll adopt an attitude like that again to any 911 caller. I doubt he will, too. I doubt he'll ever be a 911 operator again, regardless of whatever punishment he gets. -- Bill Funk Change "g" to "a" |
#200
|
|||
|
|||
"Bo Raxo" > wrote in message
k.net... > > "Tom D" > wrote in message > news:aFm1e.21665$I16.4827@trndny03... >> "Bo Raxo" > wrote in message >> news >> > >> > If the trooper had just been having a bad day or this was otherwise out > of >> > character, I would think he'd have the sense to apologize. In person. >> > How >> > hard would it be to go down to the hospital and tell the injured man > that >> > he's sorry he was rude to the guy that called in the accident, and is > glad >> > the motorcyclist is all right? Maybe call the press and say the same >> > thing? >> >> Well, he'd have to apologize to the family since the motorcyclist died a >> week after the wreck. >> > > Yeah, it's not like he could make it to the hospital in a mere *week* . > Sheesh! > > And don't tell me the patient was unconscious unless you know it for a > fact. > I was at the scene of a motorcycle crash where the rider died later that > night, and he was conscious and talking lucidly while we waited for the > ambo. Don't know if he was concious or not, but just wanted to point out that he wasn't all right. I don't disagree with your main point that if the trooper was having a bad day and was sorry, that he should have apologized. -=- Tom |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Isuzu Trooper Questions? | [email protected] | 4x4 | 1 | January 27th 05 12:36 AM |
Isuzu Trooper - Recall | michael musgrave | 4x4 | 6 | March 10th 04 04:55 AM |
2000 Trooper LS | Zip | 4x4 | 18 | January 13th 04 04:49 PM |