If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Matt O'Toole" > wrote in message ... > Jeff Strickland wrote: > > > I once owned a 2-door Accord, and I found that my liability > > insurance was higher by about $300 per year because the car only had > > 2 doors. Apparently, 2-door cars are driven more aggressively and the > > likelihood of an accident -- and a liability claim -- is much higher. > > Oh, puh-lease! Do you really think insurance companies don't set their prices > according to people's willingness to pay more, to drive a desirable vehicle? > I'm sure they probably do, but they are going to frame it in the argument that the car is more sporty, therefore more apt to be driven aggressively, and therefore more apt to be in an accident where the insurance carrier would experience increaded exposure to liability. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"dizzy" > wrote in message ... > On 22 Jun 2005 14:54:35 -0700, Ignasi Palou-Rivera > > wrote: > > >"Dave Plowman (News)" > writes: > >> In article >, > >> Jeff Strickland > wrote: > >> > The 4-door chassis is inherently more rigid, which is a good thing. The > >> > 2-door models have to have added structural parts added on -- designed > >> > in -- to get the stiffness back. This costs money. > >> > >> Unless you're talking a convertible, I can't see this. > > > >I'm with Dave here. I can't see how a door (and an opening) would add > >any rigidity. > > The 2-door has a larger hole. The 4-door has 2 more holes, but > there's a metal beam between them. > Exactly. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
In article >,
Jeff Strickland > wrote: > > >I'm with Dave here. I can't see how a door (and an opening) would add > > >any rigidity. > > > > The 2-door has a larger hole. The 4-door has 2 more holes, but > > there's a metal beam between them. > > > Exactly. So you think any two door has just a sheet of metal between front door and rear wing? The B post on a two door has to be equally as strong as on a four door to prevent the door intruding inwards in a side impact. A door adds little or no rigidity - just weight. -- *I don't suffer from insanity -- I'm a carrier Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
> In article >, > Jeff Strickland > wrote: > >>>>I'm with Dave here. I can't see how a door (and an opening) would add >>>>any rigidity. >>> >>>The 2-door has a larger hole. The 4-door has 2 more holes, but >>>there's a metal beam between them. >>> > > >>Exactly. > > > So you think any two door has just a sheet of metal between front door and > rear wing? The B post on a two door has to be equally as strong as on a > four door to prevent the door intruding inwards in a side impact. > > A door adds little or no rigidity - just weight. > I think you are missing the point, Dave. On 2 doors, the door is a much larger one to accommodate the entry to the rear seats. This larger hole is marginally less rigid than two smaller holes. The post between the doors adds structural rigidity. Or so they say... Personally, I would just buy whichever car you fancy and don't worry about such trivia... -Fred W |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
In article >,
Malt_Hound > wrote: > > So you think any two door has just a sheet of metal between front door and > > rear wing? The B post on a two door has to be equally as strong as on a > > four door to prevent the door intruding inwards in a side impact. > > > > A door adds little or no rigidity - just weight. > > > I think you are missing the point, Dave. On 2 doors, the door is a much > larger one to accommodate the entry to the rear seats. This larger hole > is marginally less rigid than two smaller holes. The post between the > doors adds structural rigidity. Or so they say... But that post will still exist on a two door? We're not talking old US cars with a perimeter frame. ;-) And I really can't see that *if* any strengthening was required, it would be more expensive than the extra door. Or as heavy. > Personally, I would just buy whichever car you fancy and don't worry > about such trivia... It's all about exclusivity. With cheap UK shopping hatches, a four door will cost more than a two. With BMW, the 'normal' car is four door therefore two - a coupe - costs more. ;-) -- *Ever stop to think and forget to start again? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Plowman (News)" > wrote in message ... > In article >, > Jeff Strickland > wrote: > > > >I'm with Dave here. I can't see how a door (and an opening) would add > > > >any rigidity. > > > > > > The 2-door has a larger hole. The 4-door has 2 more holes, but > > > there's a metal beam between them. > > > > > > Exactly. > > So you think any two door has just a sheet of metal between front door and > rear wing? The B post on a two door has to be equally as strong as on a > four door to prevent the door intruding inwards in a side impact. > > A door adds little or no rigidity - just weight. > The door adds nothing. The structural integrity is enhance when the door openings are smaller. Using this logic, a four door should be stiffer because there is an A pillar, a B pillar and a C pillar, and smaller door openings. The 2 door only has an A and a C pillar. The theory that dizzy and I are putting forth is that the 2 door has (perhaps) stiffening added to the floor pan, and this adds to the cost of the vehicle. Therer is certainly stiffening components added to the floor pan of the convertable, but this is a somewhat different situation than is presented in a hardtop 2 door car. Having suggested that, another poster suggests that the coupe gets the Sport Package as standard equipment whereas the sedan has it as an option that costs in the neighborhood of $2000. This could also explain the price difference. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"Malt_Hound" > wrote in message ... > Dave Plowman (News) wrote: > > In article >, > > Jeff Strickland > wrote: > > > >>>>I'm with Dave here. I can't see how a door (and an opening) would add > >>>>any rigidity. > >>> > >>>The 2-door has a larger hole. The 4-door has 2 more holes, but > >>>there's a metal beam between them. > >>> > > > > > >>Exactly. > > > > > > So you think any two door has just a sheet of metal between front door and > > rear wing? The B post on a two door has to be equally as strong as on a > > four door to prevent the door intruding inwards in a side impact. > > > > A door adds little or no rigidity - just weight. > > > > I think you are missing the point, Dave. On 2 doors, the door is a much > larger one to accommodate the entry to the rear seats. This larger hole > is marginally less rigid than two smaller holes. The post between the > doors adds structural rigidity. Or so they say... > > Personally, I would just buy whichever car you fancy and don't worry > about such trivia... > Once again, Fred has hit the nail squarely on the head. I can't imagine how the stiffening differences in a 2 door and a 4 door car are going to affect my life in the least. I will never get my car so close to the limits that are affected by this sort of thing to worry about the impact of having one or the other. Indeed, I may get to the limit on occasion, but when I get there I'll have many other things to be thinking about than why I have 2 or 4 doors. Having had both 2 and 4 doors, 4 is the much better option for me. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Plowman (News)" > wrote in message ... > > It's all about exclusivity. With cheap UK shopping hatches, a four door > will cost more than a two. > > With BMW, the 'normal' car is four door therefore two - a coupe - costs > more. ;-) > I'm pretty sure the E30 2-door was cheaper than the 4-door, but then we didn't refer to the 2-door as a coupe did we? At least I was lead to believe it was called a 2-door saloon. Perhaps the real answer for the E36 onwards is that the coupe shares few body panels with the saloon despite the similarity in appearance. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"Jeff Strickland" > wrote in message ... > > "Dave Plowman (News)" > wrote in message > ... >> In article >, >> Jeff Strickland > wrote: >> > > >I'm with Dave here. I can't see how a door (and an opening) would >> > > >add >> > > >any rigidity. >> > > >> > > The 2-door has a larger hole. The 4-door has 2 more holes, but >> > > there's a metal beam between them. >> > > >> >> > Exactly. >> >> So you think any two door has just a sheet of metal between front door >> and >> rear wing? The B post on a two door has to be equally as strong as on a >> four door to prevent the door intruding inwards in a side impact. >> >> A door adds little or no rigidity - just weight. >> > > The door adds nothing. The structural integrity is enhance when the door > openings are smaller. Using this logic, a four door should be stiffer > because there is an A pillar, a B pillar and a C pillar, and smaller door > openings. The 2 door only has an A and a C pillar. The theory that dizzy > and > I are putting forth is that the 2 door has (perhaps) stiffening added to > the > floor pan, and this adds to the cost of the vehicle. Therer is certainly > stiffening components added to the floor pan of the convertable, but this > is > a somewhat different situation than is presented in a hardtop 2 door car. > > Having suggested that, another poster suggests that the coupe gets the > Sport > Package as standard equipment whereas the sedan has it as an option that > costs in the neighborhood of $2000. This could also explain the price > difference. > > > A 4 door has A, B and C pillars. The compact has IIRC a standard front door and B & C pillars. A coupe typically has no B pillar, so the strength of the roof and floor pan need to be increased. A drop head coupe has no roof, so the floor has to be greatly strengthened for the structural rigidity needed in a top class car. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
No doubt there really are some real construction-cost related reasons, but
also in play is the fact that 2-doors are viewed as much more of a toy than are 4-door sedans which are more practical devices. People are in general more willing to pay more for their toys than for the practical things they need to buy. If you think about it, a properly designed 2-door should cost no more than a 4-door. Fewer parts to design, fit and align. Another example is that manufacturers, including BMW, charge more for a larger capacity version of a given engine family even though the only real changes between the, say, 2.5 L flavor and the 3.0 L are a little more metal removed in manufacturing the engine or a longer throw crank. Same transmission and drive train otherwise. Bigger bucks for the larger capacity version. Perceived value justifies it. "Vik Rubenfeld" > wrote in message ... > Why is the 2-door 330ci, more expensive than the 4-door 330i? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Replacing the door latch assembly on 98EB | [email protected] | Ford Explorer | 2 | June 10th 05 12:58 AM |
Honda OEM Parts Catalogs for Sale | Joe | Honda | 0 | February 12th 05 01:43 PM |
91 Colt 200 again....door problem this time! | Son of Sam | Technology | 0 | January 6th 05 11:00 PM |
Oval door locking problem | ningi | VW air cooled | 4 | October 18th 04 11:07 PM |
Sliding door release/lock mechanism on '80s Voyager.... | BeeP | Chrysler | 1 | October 10th 04 05:09 AM |