|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#41
November 9th 04, 11:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
att Whiting wrote:
> Daniel J. Stern wrote: > >> On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote: >> >> >>>>> No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial >>>>> hate. >>>> >> >> >>>> ...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd States >>>> of Mairca). >>> >> >> >>> Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the >>> target of hatred  >> >> >> >> Are ya sure? A lot of voters seem to hold the opposite view. > > > What is the evidence of this? > > Matt Intolerance of many groups in our society is self-evident. Many of those who are intolerant are voters. Therefore, that statement is true. 
|
| Ads |
|
#42
November 9th 04, 11:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
att Whiting wrote:
> Daniel J. Stern wrote: > >> On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote: >> >> >>>>> No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial >>>>> hate. >>>> >> >> >>>> ...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd States >>>> of Mairca). >>> >> >> >>> Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the >>> target of hatred >> >> >> >> Are ya sure? A lot of voters seem to hold the opposite view. > > > What is the evidence of this? > > Matt Intolerance of many groups in our society is self-evident. Many of those who are intolerant are voters. Therefore, that statement is true.
|
|
#43
November 10th 04, 12:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dan,
You have brilliant, thoughtful posts regarding Chrysler products, but you're showing your ignorance regarding politics. You are from Michigan, right? Michigan threw their electoral votes to Kerry, but even Michigan residents voted overwhelmingly for a constitutional amendment to define "marriage" as an institution between a man and a woman. Maybe it is dissent ... not hatred. So, here is your chance to redeem yourself: Why would so many other states add the same amendment to their constitutions? "Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message n.umich.edu... > On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote: > >>>> No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial >>>> hate. > >> > ...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd States >> > of Mairca). > >> Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the >> target of hatred > > Are ya sure? A lot of voters seem to hold the opposite view.
|
|
#44
November 10th 04, 12:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dan,
You have brilliant, thoughtful posts regarding Chrysler products, but you're showing your ignorance regarding politics. You are from Michigan, right? Michigan threw their electoral votes to Kerry, but even Michigan residents voted overwhelmingly for a constitutional amendment to define "marriage" as an institution between a man and a woman. Maybe it is dissent ... not hatred. So, here is your chance to redeem yourself: Why would so many other states add the same amendment to their constitutions? "Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message n.umich.edu... > On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote: > >>>> No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial >>>> hate. > >> > ...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd States >> > of Mairca). > >> Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the >> target of hatred > > Are ya sure? A lot of voters seem to hold the opposite view.
|
|
#45
November 10th 04, 01:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wound Up wrote:
> att Whiting wrote: > >> Daniel J. Stern wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>> No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial >>>>>> hate. >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> ...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd States >>>>> of Mairca). >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the >>>> target of hatred >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Are ya sure? A lot of voters seem to hold the opposite view. >> >> >> >> What is the evidence of this? >> >> Matt > > > Intolerance of many groups in our society is self-evident. Many of > those who are intolerant are voters. Therefore, that statement is true. > > What part of hatred didn't you understand? That was the subject under discussion, not intolerance. Matt
|
|
#46
November 10th 04, 01:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wound Up wrote:
> att Whiting wrote: > >> Daniel J. Stern wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>> No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial >>>>>> hate. >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> ...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd States >>>>> of Mairca). >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the >>>> target of hatred >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Are ya sure? A lot of voters seem to hold the opposite view. >> >> >> >> What is the evidence of this? >> >> Matt > > > Intolerance of many groups in our society is self-evident. Many of > those who are intolerant are voters. Therefore, that statement is true. > > What part of hatred didn't you understand? That was the subject under discussion, not intolerance. Matt
|
|
#47
November 10th 04, 01:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
M100C wrote:
> Dan, > You have brilliant, thoughtful posts regarding Chrysler products, but you're > showing your ignorance regarding politics. You are from Michigan, right? > Michigan threw their electoral votes to Kerry, but even Michigan residents > voted overwhelmingly for a constitutional amendment to define "marriage" as > an institution between a man and a woman. Maybe it is dissent ... not > hatred. Except that to liberals and homosexuals, anyone who disagrees with them is either intolerant or full of hatred. Matt
|
|
#48
November 10th 04, 01:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
M100C wrote:
> Dan, > You have brilliant, thoughtful posts regarding Chrysler products, but you're > showing your ignorance regarding politics. You are from Michigan, right? > Michigan threw their electoral votes to Kerry, but even Michigan residents > voted overwhelmingly for a constitutional amendment to define "marriage" as > an institution between a man and a woman. Maybe it is dissent ... not > hatred. Except that to liberals and homosexuals, anyone who disagrees with them is either intolerant or full of hatred. Matt
|
|
#49
November 10th 04, 02:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
>>>>
>>>>>>> No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial >>>>>>> hate. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> ...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd >>>>>> States >>>>>> of Mairca). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the >>>>> target of hatred >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Are ya sure? A lot of voters seem to hold the opposite view. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> What is the evidence of this? >>> >>> Matt >> >> >> >> Intolerance of many groups in our society is self-evident. Many of >> those who are intolerant are voters. Therefore, that statement is true. >> >> > > What part of hatred didn't you understand? That was the subject under > discussion, not intolerance. > > Matt > And I even started this part of the thread (head shake). I was just stating (the wrong) fact in a dry way, I didn't mean to ruffle your feathers. A LOT of people -HATE- gays? Well, not having been the target, I can't say how it feels, but a LOT in terms of likening it to the election? No, I'm with you; give me some evidence, because that's a very flimsy argument. And you might say - it's an unfair generalization...
|
|
#50
November 10th 04, 02:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
>>>>
>>>>>>> No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial >>>>>>> hate. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> ...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd >>>>>> States >>>>>> of Mairca). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the >>>>> target of hatred >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Are ya sure? A lot of voters seem to hold the opposite view. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> What is the evidence of this? >>> >>> Matt >> >> >> >> Intolerance of many groups in our society is self-evident. Many of >> those who are intolerant are voters. Therefore, that statement is true. >> >> > > What part of hatred didn't you understand? That was the subject under > discussion, not intolerance. > > Matt > And I even started this part of the thread (head shake). I was just stating (the wrong) fact in a dry way, I didn't mean to ruffle your feathers. A LOT of people -HATE- gays? Well, not having been the target, I can't say how it feels, but a LOT in terms of likening it to the election? No, I'm with you; give me some evidence, because that's a very flimsy argument. And you might say - it's an unfair generalization...
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________---_gadkypy | Michael Barnes | Driving | 4 | January 4th 05 06:47 PM |
| Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! ___________ mixqec | [email protected] | Chrysler | 37 | November 18th 04 04:18 PM |
| Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________---_ gadkypy | Paul | Antique cars | 3 | November 9th 04 06:54 PM |
| Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!!___________ mixqec | indago | Chrysler | 7 | November 8th 04 05:05 PM |
Linear Mode
