If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What's the deal about the AOD transmission?
In my slow but ongoing quest to put my 90LX alive, last weekend I
bought an AOD tranny. I mentioned some people about my acquisition and everyone told me the AOD is the worst thing that ever came out of Ford. Why is it so maligned? -- Mauricio raub-kudria-com (if you need to email me, use this address =) |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
No its not. My AOD is sitting behind 450hps and destroys those t-5s. Build
it up properly and it does just fine "Mauricio Tavares" > wrote in message ... > In my slow but ongoing quest to put my 90LX alive, last weekend I > bought an AOD tranny. I mentioned some people about my acquisition and > everyone told me the AOD is the worst thing that ever came out of Ford. > Why is it so maligned? > -- > Mauricio raub-kudria-com > (if you need to email me, use this address =) > |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Mauricio Tavares wrote:
> In my slow but ongoing quest to put my 90LX alive, last weekend I > bought an AOD tranny. I mentioned some people about my acquisition and > everyone told me the AOD is the worst thing that ever came out of Ford. > Why is it so maligned? I don't know why. It's not the best, but it's not the worst. This transmission often fails due to driver misuse. Doinks who leave the thing in OD all the time wear it out prematurely due to the fact it will shift up and down, up and down 1000s of times unnecessarily from 3rd to 4th between 35-50. If used properly, and OD is only selected for a continuous 50-55+ (assuming factory gears), it will live a long, happy life. -- Wound Up ThunderSnake #65 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Wound Up" > wrote in message ... > Mauricio Tavares wrote: > > In my slow but ongoing quest to put my 90LX alive, last weekend I > > bought an AOD tranny. I mentioned some people about my acquisition and > > everyone told me the AOD is the worst thing that ever came out of Ford. > > Why is it so maligned? > > I don't know why. It's not the best, but it's not the worst. > > This transmission often fails due to driver misuse. Doinks who leave > the thing in OD all the time wear it out prematurely due to the fact it > will shift up and down, up and down 1000s of times unnecessarily from > 3rd to 4th between 35-50. > > If used properly, and OD is only selected for a continuous 50-55+ > (assuming factory gears), it will live a long, happy life. Then why didn't ford put this information in large print in the manual. Howard (a Doink whose AOD failed at 60K) 89 LX 5.0 vert > -- > Wound Up > ThunderSnake #65 > |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Howard Nelson wrote:
> "Wound Up" > wrote in message > ... > >>Mauricio Tavares wrote: >> >>> In my slow but ongoing quest to put my 90LX alive, last weekend I >>>bought an AOD tranny. I mentioned some people about my acquisition and >>>everyone told me the AOD is the worst thing that ever came out of Ford. >>>Why is it so maligned? >> >>I don't know why. It's not the best, but it's not the worst. >> >>This transmission often fails due to driver misuse. Doinks who leave >>the thing in OD all the time wear it out prematurely due to the fact it >>will shift up and down, up and down 1000s of times unnecessarily from >>3rd to 4th between 35-50. >> >>If used properly, and OD is only selected for a continuous 50-55+ >>(assuming factory gears), it will live a long, happy life. > > > Then why didn't ford put this information in large print in the manual. Fair question, and two answers are CAFE standards, and parts resale. You're one of the many innocent victims, and not just of Ford's. > > Howard (a Doink whose AOD failed at 60K) > 89 LX 5.0 vert > > >>-- >>Wound Up >>ThunderSnake #65 >> > > > -- Wound Up ThunderSnake #65 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In article >, Mauricio Tavares
> wrote: > In my slow but ongoing quest to put my 90LX alive, last weekend I > bought an AOD tranny. I mentioned some people about my acquisition and > everyone told me the AOD is the worst thing that ever came out of Ford. > Why is it so maligned? Because people are idiots. Try he http://www.lentechautomatics.com/aodhome.html -- CobraJet |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I agree that the Ford OD is OK. We did have problems with the first one
in our family - a '88 Grand Marquis - strarted to shift rough and the dealer just put some majic friction reducer addition in it and told Mom to keep it out of OD in town. Never another problem. Have had 3 others since then - no prob. BUT the tranys in the new 'Stangs are made in Italy, France and other places - wonder if there's a difference? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 08:51:29 -0500, Mauricio Tavares >
wrote: > In my slow but ongoing quest to put my 90LX alive, last weekend I >bought an AOD tranny. I mentioned some people about my acquisition and >everyone told me the AOD is the worst thing that ever came out of Ford. >Why is it so maligned? Hard to say. I only blew the 4th gear out of 5 of them. -Rich |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
RichA wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 08:51:29 -0500, Mauricio Tavares > > wrote: > > >> In my slow but ongoing quest to put my 90LX alive, last weekend I >>bought an AOD tranny. I mentioned some people about my acquisition and >>everyone told me the AOD is the worst thing that ever came out of Ford. >>Why is it so maligned? > > > Hard to say. I only blew the 4th gear out of 5 of them. No it isn't... read my previous posts on that. -- Wound Up ThunderSnake #65 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 08:51:29 -0500, Mauricio Tavares >
wrote: > In my slow but ongoing quest to put my 90LX alive, last weekend I >bought an AOD tranny. I mentioned some people about my acquisition and >everyone told me the AOD is the worst thing that ever came out of Ford. >Why is it so maligned? >-- >Mauricio raub-kudria-com >(if you need to email me, use this address =) > The guy I use for rebuilding transmissions thoughts on the subject is that they are overbuilt. I only know that before I stopped using the od in rural and/or town areas they generally would fail between 60,000 and 100,000 miles. These transmissions were from 92'?, 95', 98', and 02' year Ford Vans having from 4.9l L6 to 5.4l V-8's. All of the above had a disable switch on the shifter handle. My newest Van, a E-350 Super Duty w/ a 6.8l V-10 has a 4 speed auto /od but no overdrive off switch, instead it has a Tow/Haul switch which uses the gearing to assist slowing down or will keep the trans in gear longer on acceleration. In case anyone wants to know how it feels when you hit the go pedal, well I didn't expect 8,000 plus pounds to move as well as it does. 420 lb/ft of torque is nice. ...Ron -- 68' Camaro RS 88' Firebird Formula 00' Mustang GT Vert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New *FREE* Corvette Discussion Forum | JLA ENTERPRISES TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATION | Corvette | 12 | November 30th 04 06:36 PM |
'04 Transmission Question | dicko | Ford Explorer | 4 | November 14th 04 12:40 AM |
1997 civic transmission or ecu problem ?? | Matt | Honda | 1 | October 10th 04 05:00 PM |
2000 C5, 50k miles, 6-spd, transmission noise | Alex J. Avriette | Corvette | 4 | August 31st 04 01:35 AM |