Haynes manual instructions

Lawrence Glickman wrote:
>
> I'll go where I choose, do what I choose, and if you don't like it you
> can go **** yourself. Nobody tells me what to do or not to do and I
> do mean, nobody.

your internet connection doesn't work that way. Your ISP's TOS has a
clause that allows disconnecting you for being an asshole. So, keep
being an asshole and you'll be an internet-free asshole.

Don't believe me, email your ISP and ask them about it. Tell them some
stupid <insert favorite racial slur here> on usenet are causing you trouble.

On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 20:03:27 GMT, Ray > wrote:

>Lawrence Glickman wrote:
>>
>> I'll go where I choose, do what I choose, and if you don't like it you
>> can go **** yourself. Nobody tells me what to do or not to do and I
>> do mean, nobody.
>
>your internet connection doesn't work that way. Your ISP's TOS has a
>clause that allows disconnecting you for being an asshole. So, keep
>being an asshole and you'll be an internet-free asshole.
>
>Don't believe me, email your ISP and ask them about it. Tell them some
>stupid <insert favorite racial slur here> on usenet are causing you trouble.

Another JERK heard from.

If you take everybody of the Internet that uses offensive language.

www.stormfront.com
and
www.vanguard.com

should have their websites yanked fortwith.

Do you think I should send a notice to their ISP?

Let me know, and I will be sure to follow your instructions to a "T"

Lg

On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 20:03:27 GMT, Ray > wrote:

>Lawrence Glickman wrote:
>>
>> I'll go where I choose, do what I choose, and if you don't like it you
>> can go **** yourself. Nobody tells me what to do or not to do and I
>> do mean, nobody.
>
>your internet connection doesn't work that way. Your ISP's TOS has a
>clause that allows disconnecting you for being an asshole. So, keep
>being an asshole and you'll be an internet-free asshole.
>
>Don't believe me, email your ISP and ask them about it. Tell them some
>stupid <insert favorite racial slur here> on usenet are causing you trouble.

Another JERK heard from.

If you take everybody of the Internet that uses offensive language.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Try this for you latest Neo-Nazi information and propaganda:

www.stormfront.org

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

should have this website yanked forthwith.

Do you think I should send a notice to their ISP?

Let me know, and I will be sure to follow your instructions to a "T"

Lg

Lawrence Glickman wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 20:03:27 GMT, Ray > wrote:
>
>
>>Lawrence Glickman wrote:
>>
>>>I'll go where I choose, do what I choose, and if you don't like it you
>>>can go **** yourself. Nobody tells me what to do or not to do and I
>>>do mean, nobody.
>>
>>your internet connection doesn't work that way. Your ISP's TOS has a
>>clause that allows disconnecting you for being an asshole. So, keep
>>being an asshole and you'll be an internet-free asshole.
>>
>>Don't believe me, email your ISP and ask them about it. Tell them some
>>stupid <insert favorite racial slur here> on usenet are causing you trouble.
>
>
> Another JERK heard from.
>
> If you take everybody of the Internet that uses offensive language.
>
> www.stormfront.com
> and
> www.vanguard.com
>
> should have their websites yanked fortwith.
>
> Do you think I should send a notice to their ISP?
>
> Let me know, and I will be sure to follow your instructions to a "T"
>
> Lg
>

You know, I really shouldn't bother to reply, but you just don't have a
clue, do you? YOUR ISP (like most) has an acceptable use policy
covering flame wars/racism/off topic stuff and a whole whack of other
stuff that covers their users. You **** off enough people with that
little attitude of yours and you might find your access cut off.

from http://www.comcast.net/terms/use.jsp
(I suggest you read it. Or have someone read it to you using small
words so you can understand it.)

<>
Prohibited Uses and Activities
Prohibited uses include, but are not limited to, using the Service,
Customer Equipment, or the Comcast Equipment to:

(i) undertake or accomplish any unlawful purpose. This includes, but is
not limited to, posting, storing, transmitting or disseminating
information, data or material which is libelous, obscene, unlawful,
threatening, defamatory, or which infringes the intellectual property
rights of any person or entity, or which in any way constitutes or
encourages conduct that would constitute a criminal offense, give rise
to civil liability, or otherwise violate any local, state, federal or
international law, order or regulation;

(ii) post, store, send, transmit, or disseminate any information or
material which a reasonable person could deem to be objectionable,
offensive, indecent, pornographic, harassing, threatening, embarrassing,
distressing, vulgar, hateful, racially or ethnically offensive, or
otherwise inappropriate, regardless of whether this material or its
dissemination is unlawful;

....

Comcast prefers to advise customers of inappropriate behavior and any
necessary corrective action. However, if the Service is used in a way
that Comcast or its suppliers, in their sole discretion, believe violate
this AUP, Comcast or its suppliers may take any responsive actions they
deem appropriate. These actions include, but are not limited to,
temporary or permanent removal of content, cancellation of newsgroup
posts, filtering of Internet transmissions, and the immediate suspension
or termination of all or any portion of the Service. Neither Comcast nor
its affiliates, suppliers, or agents will have any liability for any
these responsive actions. These actions are not Comcast's exclusive
remedies and Comcast may take any other legal or technical action it
deems appropriate.

On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 05:44:15 GMT, Ray > wrote:

>Lawrence Glickman wrote:
>> On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 20:03:27 GMT, Ray > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Lawrence Glickman wrote:
>>>
>>>>I'll go where I choose, do what I choose, and if you don't like it you
>>>>can go **** yourself. Nobody tells me what to do or not to do and I
>>>>do mean, nobody.
>>>
>>>your internet connection doesn't work that way. Your ISP's TOS has a
>>>clause that allows disconnecting you for being an asshole. So, keep
>>>being an asshole and you'll be an internet-free asshole.
>>>
>>>Don't believe me, email your ISP and ask them about it. Tell them some
>>>stupid <insert favorite racial slur here> on usenet are causing you trouble.
>>
>>
>> Another JERK heard from.
>>
>> If you take everybody of the Internet that uses offensive language.
>>
>> www.stormfront.com
>> and
>> www.vanguard.com
>>
>> should have their websites yanked fortwith.
>>
>> Do you think I should send a notice to their ISP?
>>
>> Let me know, and I will be sure to follow your instructions to a "T"
>>
>> Lg
>>
>
>You know, I really shouldn't bother to reply, but you just don't have a
> clue, do you?

I will tell you one thing, boi,

You take me off the air, and I gua ran tee that Stormfront is going
down with me.

Now if you want to keep your anti-semitic hate site running as it has
in the past, I suggest you bugger off, as I have higher connections
than ISP Serice Representatives.

Your White Pride anti-semitic racist site will be in smoke and flames,
regardless of what happens to me.

Think about it.

I suggest you shut your ****in mouth before I get a hankerin to take
the issue to the Feds.

Lg

I'm also reluctant to sully myself with this, but there's such a thing
as being your own ISP, which it appears those other sites have done and
would explain their continuing existence. That's how terrorist groups,
spammers, and other scum get around the normal rules of decency (or they
just find ISP's with sub-human standards).

I don't think Comcast is an anything-goes ISP (with or without their
TOS). You'll probably find out soon enough.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
adddress with the letter 'x')

On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 09:02:09 -0500, Bill Putney >
wrote:

>
>I'm also reluctant to sully myself with this, but there's such a thing
>as being your own ISP, which it appears those other sites have done and
>would explain their continuing existence. That's how terrorist groups,
>spammers, and other scum get around the normal rules of decency (or they
>just find ISP's with sub-human standards).
>
>I don't think Comcast is an anything-goes ISP (with or without their
>TOS). You'll probably find out soon enough.
>
>Bill Putney

Bill Putney, Net Cop

Let me tell you something. Not 1 minute goes by on UselessNet when
someone doesn't say something that offends somebody else.

So that's the way the game is played here. And that is why killfile
filters are built into Newsreaders.

I will consider any attempt to violate my First Ammendment Rights as
grounds to involve the constitutent parties in a Federal Lawsuit. I
hope you have _deep_ pockets.

Now, you are harassing me, and throwing veiled threats in my
direction, so I advise you to cease and desist immediately.

Lg


>(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
>adddress with the letter 'x')

Lawrence Glickman wrote:

> On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 08:14:16 -0500, Matt Whiting
> > wrote:
>
>
>>Lawrence Glickman wrote:

>>You may well be correct about it being a statute, but you're not correct
>>about it being enforced. I've never seen or even heard of anyone being
>>written up for blowing their horn.
>>
>>
>>Matt
>
>
> This ordinance is -Enforced- in the City of Chicago, and may explain
> why it is so delightfully quiet.

Which Chicago are you talking about? I was in Chicago, IL on vacation
just a couple of years ago and it was anything but quiet. That was my
last vacation there as well since I'll never spend another dollar in
Chicago after the Meigs act of terrorism.


Matt

On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 14:01:30 -0500, Matt Whiting
> wrote:

>Lawrence Glickman wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 08:14:16 -0500, Matt Whiting
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Lawrence Glickman wrote:
>
>>>You may well be correct about it being a statute, but you're not correct
>>>about it being enforced. I've never seen or even heard of anyone being
>>>written up for blowing their horn.
>>>
>>>
>>>Matt
>>
>>
>> This ordinance is -Enforced- in the City of Chicago, and may explain
>> why it is so delightfully quiet.
>
>Which Chicago are you talking about? I was in Chicago, IL on vacation
>just a couple of years ago and it was anything but quiet. That was my
>last vacation there as well since I'll never spend another dollar in
>Chicago after the Meigs act of terrorism.
>
>
>Matt

Chicago Illinois.
I don't go downtown that much, because the traffic is bad all the
time. But people tend to lay-OFF the horn business because the
Chicago PD Traffic Cops are tough as nails, and don't take any ****
from anybody, so the net result, is *pretty damn quiet for a city of
this size.*

It is even more quiet in the burbs, where I live. I'm lucky if I hear
1 horn beep in an entire day.

As far as *trouble*/terrorism is concerned, this does happen to be a
bit of a rowdy town, but so is Scranton Pennsylvania. Anywhere you
find a lot of blue collar beer-swilling people around, you're going to
find a bit of mischief. For the most part, the worst you end up with
is a bloody nose. The only people I know of that _deliberately_ go
looking for trouble are , eh......

hmmmm. Gang member, of which there are 50,000 in the Chicagoland
area.

Those are the guys you want to watch out for. The mokes from the
mills are pretty good folks, all said. A scuffle here and there is to
be expected on a friday or saturday night when the guys get loaded
with their favorite brew.

Otoh, with the gangsters, ah.....
well just stay away from them. If you know the city, you know that
the *core* is safe. Go anywhere else, do so with a local who knows
the territory.

I've lived here for 30 years, and is it a Miracle I am still alive
with all my fingers and toes intact? No. I just know where the
danger zones are, and stay away from them. And If I -do- have to
travel through them, I am handing out Courtesy like it is going out of
business. That's one thing gangsters appreciate, a little courtesy,
as they usually spend their life in hell, and it is nice to hear a
kind word from time to time. That will buy you a LOT around here, in
Chicago. A little _courtesy_. In fact, it can stop a robbery in its
tracks. Courtesy is what you want to have in your pocket, not mace,
not a gun, not a knife, _courtesy_. That will disarm all but the most
*rabid* of drug addicts.

It is a good city with a lot of good people.

Lg

Lawrence Glickman wrote:

> As far as *trouble*/terrorism is concerned, this does happen to be a
> bit of a rowdy town, but so is Scranton Pennsylvania. Anywhere you
> find a lot of blue collar beer-swilling people around, you're going to
> find a bit of mischief. For the most part, the worst you end up with
> is a bloody nose. The only people I know of that _deliberately_ go
> looking for trouble are , eh......

I don't worry about the blue collar folks, it is the politician
terrorists that I despise. The one's that rip up airports in the middle
of the night. Chicago has long been one of the most corrupt cities in
the US and the current mayor is adding to that reputation.

Matt