So what should be the penalty for speeding?

Collision at 75 vs. 55 mph has alot more energy behind it= a higher risk
of injury/death. Much higher.

Speeding should be cracked down on. Most people are not that great
drivers, and almost half of them are driving vehicles that are prone to poor
breaking and poor traction on pavement- SUV's and trucks.

In article >, Magnulus wrote:
> Collision at 75 vs. 55 mph has alot more energy behind it= a higher risk
> of injury/death. Much higher.

Only IN a crash. However, the higher speed limit when more appropiate for
the road will PREVENT the crashes in the first place. I'd rather not
crash at 100mph than crash at 40mph. How about you?

> Speeding should be cracked down on. Most people are not that great
> drivers, and almost half of them are driving vehicles that are prone to poor
> breaking and poor traction on pavement- SUV's and trucks.

Dumbing things down is why they are bad drivers. Demand competence
instead of lowering the bar for incompetence. By lowering the bar,
incompetence is promoted and flurishes.

In article >, Magnulus wrote:
> Collision at 75 vs. 55 mph has alot more energy behind it= a higher risk
> of injury/death. Much higher.

Only IN a crash. However, the higher speed limit when more appropiate for
the road will PREVENT the crashes in the first place. I'd rather not
crash at 100mph than crash at 40mph. How about you?

> Speeding should be cracked down on. Most people are not that great
> drivers, and almost half of them are driving vehicles that are prone to poor
> breaking and poor traction on pavement- SUV's and trucks.

Dumbing things down is why they are bad drivers. Demand competence
instead of lowering the bar for incompetence. By lowering the bar,
incompetence is promoted and flurishes.

Laura Bush murdered her boy friend a écrit :
>>>>Max Jan 7, 3:12 pm
>
> Because, that was entirely the idea behind the 55mph speed limit, and
> there is no reason that you should be heavily penalized (or penalized
> at
> all IMO) for driving at a safe speed that may be "fast".
> Translation - URACRIMINALCODDLER
>
>
> --
>

pardon? What?

What is this word?

"Criminal coddler"?
By your definitions I would be a murderer yes?

--
----------------------
http://www.saab-900.tk
The Saab Tech Resource
----------------------

Laura Bush murdered her boy friend a écrit :
>>>>Max Jan 7, 3:12 pm
>
> Because, that was entirely the idea behind the 55mph speed limit, and
> there is no reason that you should be heavily penalized (or penalized
> at
> all IMO) for driving at a safe speed that may be "fast".
> Translation - URACRIMINALCODDLER
>
>
> --
>

pardon? What?

What is this word?

"Criminal coddler"?
By your definitions I would be a murderer yes?

--
----------------------
http://www.saab-900.tk
The Saab Tech Resource
----------------------

Magnulus a écrit :
> Collision at 75 vs. 55 mph has alot more energy behind it= a higher risk
> of injury/death. Much higher.
>

>
>

NO ****!



--
----------------------
http://www.saab-900.tk
The Saab Tech Resource
----------------------

Magnulus a écrit :
> Collision at 75 vs. 55 mph has alot more energy behind it= a higher risk
> of injury/death. Much higher.
>

>
>

NO ****!



--
----------------------
http://www.saab-900.tk
The Saab Tech Resource
----------------------

>Brent P Jan 8, 7:07 pm

>. However, the higher speed limit when more appropiate for
>the road will PREVENT the crashes in the first place.
HUH??? hey loonybird. How do you figure that??

>Brent P Jan 8, 7:07 pm

>. However, the higher speed limit when more appropiate for
>the road will PREVENT the crashes in the first place.
HUH??? hey loonybird. How do you figure that??

Jan 8, 12:56 pm

>So you admit your proposition makes no sense? Most speeders haven't
>killed anyone either. Therefore it is ridiculous to suggest more than
>whatever minimal fine there is.
Read a book on elementary logic and get back with us.