If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Honda's official word on "flushing"
From the February '06 issues of Honda and Acura Service News, Honda's
official newsletters to Honda and Acura dealers: Flush Systems: A Big Taboo In Honda/Acura vehicles, the transmission, as well as the systems that handle lubrication, cooling, fuel, and power steering, are designed to give thousands of miles of trouble-free service if you follow the maintenance schedule to the letter. Flush systems are a popular aftermarket offering these days. These products look impressive and make lots of claims, but American Honda strongly recommends you avoid using them on any Honda/Acura vehicle. Here’s why: * The maintenance schedule neither requires nor approves of aftermarket flush systems. * Flush systems take time to do; this adds to your service client’s wait time. * Flush systems haven’t demonstrated an improvement in vehicle performance or reliability. * Flush systems using solvents may leave solvent in the system you’re flushing. This will dilute the fluid or lubricant and degrade its performance. * Flush systems using filters can filter out vital additives and degrade the fluid’s or lubricant’s performance. This is particularly true for coolant. * Any damage caused by flush systems isn’t covered by warranty. -- Tegger The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Honda's official word on "flushing"
Tegger wrote:
> From the February '06 issues of Honda and Acura Service News, Honda's > official newsletters to Honda and Acura dealers: > > Flush Systems: A Big Taboo > In Honda/Acura vehicles, the transmission, as well as the systems that > handle lubrication, cooling, fuel, and power steering, are designed to give > thousands of miles of trouble-free service if you follow the maintenance > schedule to the letter. > > Flush systems are a popular aftermarket offering these days. These products > look impressive and make lots of claims, but American Honda strongly > recommends you avoid using them on any Honda/Acura vehicle. Here’s why: > > * The maintenance schedule neither requires nor approves of aftermarket > flush systems. > * Flush systems take time to do; this adds to your service client’s wait > time. > * Flush systems haven’t demonstrated an improvement in vehicle performance > or reliability. > * Flush systems using solvents may leave solvent in the system you’re > flushing. This will dilute the fluid or lubricant and degrade its > performance. > * Flush systems using filters can filter out vital additives and degrade > the fluid’s or lubricant’s performance. This is particularly true for > coolant. > * Any damage caused by flush systems isn’t covered by warranty. > ---------------------- And they didn't even mention the most important / expensive reasons: The goofs at your local Monkey Lube will hook up the hoses backwards and flush the contents of the internal transmission filter throughout your tranny, then refill it with Dexron or something else that will further help to destroy your new tranny :-( 'Curly' |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Honda's official word on "flushing"
"motsco_" > wrote in message
... > Tegger wrote: > > From the February '06 issues of Honda and Acura Service News, Honda's > > official newsletters to Honda and Acura dealers: > > > > Flush Systems: A Big Taboo > > In Honda/Acura vehicles, the transmission, as well as the systems that > > handle lubrication, cooling, fuel, and power steering, are designed to give > > thousands of miles of trouble-free service if you follow the maintenance > > schedule to the letter. > > > > Flush systems are a popular aftermarket offering these days. These products > > look impressive and make lots of claims, but American Honda strongly > > recommends you avoid using them on any Honda/Acura vehicle. Here’s why: > > > > * The maintenance schedule neither requires nor approves of aftermarket > > flush systems. > > * Flush systems take time to do; this adds to your service client’s wait > > time. > > * Flush systems haven’t demonstrated an improvement in vehicle performance > > or reliability. > > * Flush systems using solvents may leave solvent in the system you’re > > flushing. This will dilute the fluid or lubricant and degrade its > > performance. > > * Flush systems using filters can filter out vital additives and degrade > > the fluid’s or lubricant’s performance. This is particularly true for > > coolant. > > * Any damage caused by flush systems isn’t covered by warranty. > > > ---------------------- > > And they didn't even mention the most important / expensive reasons: The > goofs at your local Monkey Lube will hook up the hoses backwards and > flush the contents of the internal transmission filter throughout your > tranny, then refill it with Dexron or something else that will further > help to destroy your new tranny :-( > > 'Curly' The owner's manual for our CR-V says to change the transmission fluid three times, driving between each time. That's a lot of transmission fluid, especially if you have to pay "Honda Genuine" prices for it. I don't know, we bought the vehicle used at 100,000 miles, and it seems to have been well maintained, but the tranny fluid looked black in the drain pan although it looked good on the dipstick. Earle |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Honda's official word on "flushing"
Earle Horton wrote:
>> And they didn't even mention the most important / expensive reasons: The >> goofs at your local Monkey Lube will hook up the hoses backwards and >> flush the contents of the internal transmission filter throughout your >> tranny, then refill it with Dexron or something else that will further >> help to destroy your new tranny :-( >> >> 'Curly' > > The owner's manual for our CR-V says to change the transmission fluid three > times, driving between each time. That's a lot of transmission fluid, > especially if you have to pay "Honda Genuine" prices for it. I don't know, > we bought the vehicle used at 100,000 miles, and it seems to have been well > maintained, but the tranny fluid looked black in the drain pan although it > looked good on the dipstick. > > Earle --------------------------------- I always ask people to wipe the dipstick on a piece of white paper to determine the color better. I've owned four used CR-V's and I did the triple drain-n-fill on all of them. I think it's cheap insurance in case the last owner may have neglected the tranny. What's the cost of a few bottles of Z1 compared to replacing a reamed-out tranny? P.S. Did you replace the Dual Pump Fluid in the rear differential too? 30,000 miles is the correct interval... At least you only need one litre. :-) 'Curly' |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Honda's official word on "flushing"
Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:
> In article >, > "Earle Horton" > wrote: > >> The owner's manual for our CR-V says to change the transmission fluid three >> times, driving between each time. > > That is Honda's official recommendation for a "flush". That is, the > drain/fill/drive/ cycles help get more of the original fluid out than a > simple drain. But such a procedure is not what they recommend for > maintenance. > > Honda's specification for regular maintenance merely states a drain and > fill. ---------------------------------- Granted, but if you have NO IDEA whether the previous owner ever changed it for 100,000 miles, or overheated it, or got water in it, it makes sense to 'start fresh' as you can, No? 'Curly' |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Honda's official word on "flushing"
"motsco_" > wrote in message
... > Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote: > > In article >, > > "Earle Horton" > wrote: > > > >> The owner's manual for our CR-V says to change the transmission fluid three > >> times, driving between each time. > > > > That is Honda's official recommendation for a "flush". That is, the > > drain/fill/drive/ cycles help get more of the original fluid out than a > > simple drain. But such a procedure is not what they recommend for > > maintenance. > > > > Honda's specification for regular maintenance merely states a drain and > > fill. > > ---------------------------------- > > Granted, but if you have NO IDEA whether the previous owner ever > changed it for 100,000 miles, or overheated it, or got water in it, it > makes sense to 'start fresh' as you can, No? > I agree, and I did change the dual pump fluid too. Where to get Z1 at a good price? I live about 120 miles from one Honda dealer, 135 from the other next closest one. Thanks, Earle |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Honda's official word on "flushing"
"motsco_" > wrote in message
... > Earle Horton wrote: > >> And they didn't even mention the most important / expensive reasons: The > >> goofs at your local Monkey Lube will hook up the hoses backwards and > >> flush the contents of the internal transmission filter throughout your > >> tranny, then refill it with Dexron or something else that will further > >> help to destroy your new tranny :-( > >> > >> 'Curly' > > > > The owner's manual for our CR-V says to change the transmission fluid three > > times, driving between each time. That's a lot of transmission fluid, > > especially if you have to pay "Honda Genuine" prices for it. I don't know, > > we bought the vehicle used at 100,000 miles, and it seems to have been well > > maintained, but the tranny fluid looked black in the drain pan although it > > looked good on the dipstick. > > > > Earle > > --------------------------------- > > I always ask people to wipe the dipstick on a piece of white paper to > determine the color better. I've owned four used CR-V's and I did the > triple drain-n-fill on all of them. I think it's cheap insurance in case > the last owner may have neglected the tranny. > > What's the cost of a few bottles of Z1 compared to replacing a > reamed-out tranny? > > P.S. Did you replace the Dual Pump Fluid in the rear differential too? > 30,000 miles is the correct interval... At least you only need one > litre. :-) > Yeah. Clean as a whistle, but why not believe the owner's manual when you have spent a ridiculous amount of money for a used vehicle, just because it is a Honda? That rear diff. looks expensive. That tranny does too. Cheap sources for Z1, or thoughts on using Dexron for the first two changes? Cheers, Earle |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Honda's official word on "flushing"
Earle Horton wrote:
> "motsco_" > wrote in message > ... >> Earle Horton wrote: >>>> And they didn't even mention the most important / expensive reasons: > The >>>> goofs at your local Monkey Lube will hook up the hoses backwards and >>>> flush the contents of the internal transmission filter throughout your >>>> tranny, then refill it with Dexron or something else that will further >>>> help to destroy your new tranny :-( >>>> >>>> 'Curly' >>> The owner's manual for our CR-V says to change the transmission fluid > three >>> times, driving between each time. That's a lot of transmission fluid, >>> especially if you have to pay "Honda Genuine" prices for it. I don't > know, >>> we bought the vehicle used at 100,000 miles, and it seems to have been > well >>> maintained, but the tranny fluid looked black in the drain pan although > it >>> looked good on the dipstick. >>> >>> Earle >> --------------------------------- >> >> I always ask people to wipe the dipstick on a piece of white paper to >> determine the color better. I've owned four used CR-V's and I did the >> triple drain-n-fill on all of them. I think it's cheap insurance in case >> the last owner may have neglected the tranny. >> >> What's the cost of a few bottles of Z1 compared to replacing a >> reamed-out tranny? >> >> P.S. Did you replace the Dual Pump Fluid in the rear differential too? >> 30,000 miles is the correct interval... At least you only need one >> litre. :-) >> > Yeah. Clean as a whistle, but why not believe the owner's manual when you > have spent a ridiculous amount of money for a used vehicle, just because it > is a Honda? That rear diff. looks expensive. That tranny does too. Cheap > sources for Z1, or thoughts on using Dexron for the first two changes? > > Cheers, > > Earle ---------------------------------- I run Z1 in my rear differentials. I'm totally convinced it's the same stuff. In some countries you can't get DPF, so the dealers just sell Z1 and everything works OK. I have the choice of three dealers but Z1 still expensive. For the tranny, Dexron for the first drain-n-fill would be OK, I'm thinking, but Z1 for the next two, for sure. I drain it very patiently. I think Z1 just has a few essential additives, but is probably just Dexron otherwise. 'Curly' |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Honda's official word on "flushing"
> For the tranny, Dexron for the first drain-n-fill would be OK, I'm > thinking, but Z1 for the next two, for sure. I drain it very patiently. I > think Z1 just has a few essential additives, but is probably just Dexron > otherwise. How long to drive between the drain-n-fills ? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Honda's official word on "flushing"
fvckH1B wrote:
>> For the tranny, Dexron for the first drain-n-fill would be OK, I'm >> thinking, but Z1 for the next two, for sure. I drain it very patiently. I >> think Z1 just has a few essential additives, but is probably just Dexron >> otherwise. > > How long to drive between the drain-n-fills ? ------------------------------------ The shop manual says you can just run it through the gears for a few minutes, sitting still. If you drive it until next weekend you get more magnetic particles (fuzz) on the recently cleaned magnet due to more exposure. I like to get as much out as I can, partly as a diagnostic. 'Curly' |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Fwd: "HEMI-Powered" "L.W.(Sweet Billy Goatman) Hughes III" WOW - we'refamous...!!!] | L.W.(Bill) Hughes III[_1_] | Auto Photos | 0 | November 16th 06 08:04 PM |
"Honda's new CR-V offers even more than earlier models" | Mike | Honda | 0 | November 4th 06 08:17 PM |
Bush: invading Iraq = GREAT idea but deporting illegals = "impractical" and "won't work" | [email protected] | Driving | 0 | July 8th 06 02:53 PM |
Volkswagen exposes the swastika as "S" for "socialism" - known as the "swastika hubcap" car, the VW hubcaps (when spinning at certain speeds) remind some people of the symbol of the National Socialist German Workers' Par | rexcurrydotnet | Driving | 0 | February 23rd 06 06:23 PM |