A Cars forum. AutoBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AutoBanter forum » Auto makers » Mazda
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Shocks & springs



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 7th 04, 09:30 AM
Eric Baber
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Shocks & springs

I'm going to have my shock absorbers replaced on my 55,000 mile 1992 MX5
following various postings here saying that the shocks will be well and
truly dead by now (to my knowledge they're still the original ones - there's
no record of them having been replaced, and when braking hard the car
strongly pulls to the right which apparently is an indication of dead
shocks, right?) My question is whether to replace the springs as well while
I'm at it. Do the springs have a longer/indefinite life-span, or would it be
sensible to replace them at the same time as the shocks?

Thanks

Eric


Ads
  #2  
Old September 7th 04, 01:54 PM
Lanny Chambers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article >,
"Eric Baber" > wrote:

> when braking hard the car strongly pulls to the right which
> apparently is an indication of dead shocks, right?)


No. Check your caliper slider pins.

> My question is whether to replace the springs as well while
> I'm at it.


Not necessary. Springs don't wear out.

--
Lanny Chambers, St. Louis, USA
'94C
the alignment page:
http://www.hummingbirds.net/alignment.html
  #3  
Old September 7th 04, 06:27 PM
MLB
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Eric Baber" > wrote in
:

> I'm going to have my shock absorbers replaced on my 55,000 mile 1992
> MX5 following various postings here saying that the shocks will be
> well and truly dead by now (to my knowledge they're still the original
> ones - there's no record of them having been replaced, and when
> braking hard the car strongly pulls to the right which apparently is
> an indication of dead shocks, right?) My question is whether to
> replace the springs as well while I'm at it. Do the springs have a
> longer/indefinite life-span, or would it be sensible to replace them
> at the same time as the shocks?
>
> Thanks
>
> Eric
>
>


Shocks have nothing to do with the car pulling to the right. THat's your
brakes.

Shocks may or may not be trashed at that mileage. If you push down on a
corner of the car and then let up does it come back up and stop or keep
bouncing? Springs are definitely not even close to sacked at that mileage.
Plenty of OEM springs with 155,000 that are still fine.
Get your brakes fixed!
  #4  
Old September 8th 04, 06:06 PM
Lanny Chambers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article >,
MLB > wrote:

> Shocks may or may not be trashed at that mileage. If you push down on a
> corner of the car and then let up does it come back up and stop or keep
> bouncing?


FYI, that test doesn't work on a Miata. It won't bounce no matter how
bad the shocks are. If the rear bottoms in dips, the shocks are wasted.

--
Lanny Chambers, St. Louis, USA
'94C
the alignment page:
http://www.hummingbirds.net/alignment.html
  #5  
Old September 9th 04, 09:23 AM
Eric Baber
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

> FYI, that test doesn't work on a Miata. It won't bounce no matter how
> bad the shocks are. If the rear bottoms in dips, the shocks are wasted.


And it certainly does that!! Glad to hear I don't have to replace the
springs though.

Eric


  #6  
Old September 9th 04, 05:18 PM
Frank Berger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Lanny Chambers" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> MLB > wrote:
>
> > Shocks may or may not be trashed at that mileage. If you push down on a
> > corner of the car and then let up does it come back up and stop or keep
> > bouncing?

>
> FYI, that test doesn't work on a Miata. It won't bounce no matter how
> bad the shocks are. If the rear bottoms in dips, the shocks are wasted.
>
> --
> Lanny Chambers, St. Louis, USA
> '94C
> the alignment page:
> http://www.hummingbirds.net/alignment.html


I have 80,000 miles on my '96. It doesn't seem to bottom in dips. So why
have my shocks lasted so much longer then they should accordiong to the
conventional wisdom? I remember reading here that they're toast after
about 40,000 miles. Is there a more rigorous method of testing the shocks
on a Miata?


  #7  
Old September 10th 04, 08:39 AM
Eric Baber
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

> I have 80,000 miles on my '96. It doesn't seem to bottom in dips. So why
> have my shocks lasted so much longer then they should accordiong to the
> conventional wisdom? I remember reading here that they're toast after
> about 40,000 miles.


Does it perhaps depend on the type of driving you do? I would expect city
driving (with more potholes etc) to be rougher on shocks than, say, lots of
motorway driving - could that be the case? What type of driving do you
usually do?

Eric


  #8  
Old September 11th 04, 06:56 AM
Frank Berger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Eric Baber" > wrote in message
...
> > I have 80,000 miles on my '96. It doesn't seem to bottom in dips. So

why
> > have my shocks lasted so much longer then they should accordiong to the
> > conventional wisdom? I remember reading here that they're toast after
> > about 40,000 miles.

>
> Does it perhaps depend on the type of driving you do? I would expect city
> driving (with more potholes etc) to be rougher on shocks than, say, lots

of
> motorway driving - could that be the case? What type of driving do you
> usually do?
>
> Eric
>
>

Mixed. Maybe my shocks are worn and I just don't realize it.


  #9  
Old September 11th 04, 02:07 PM
Iva
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Frank Berger wrote:
> >

> Mixed. Maybe my shocks are worn and I just don't realize it.
>


When I had the shocks replaced on my Miata,the difference in
handling was amazing . It was also kind of an eye-opener when I
got out of her the first time - she sat at least an inch higher
off the ground!

Iva & Belle.)
'90B Classic Red.)
#3 winkin' Miata


  #10  
Old September 11th 04, 03:48 PM
Grant Edwards
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 2004-09-11, Iva > wrote:

>> Mixed. Maybe my shocks are worn and I just don't realize it.

>
> When I had the shocks replaced on my Miata,the difference in
> handling was amazing . It was also kind of an eye-opener when I
> got out of her the first time - she sat at least an inch higher
> off the ground!


You must have replaced the shocks with new ones that didn't
have the same geometry as the stock ones. Normally, shock
replacement shouldn't change ride height.

--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! I'm thinking about
at DIGITAL READ-OUT systems
visi.com and computer-generated
IMAGE FORMATIONS...
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Suspension Springs for 1976 Rabbit? HerHusband VW water cooled 16 December 19th 04 09:47 PM
Using E36 M3 shocks and springs on other E36s Leon BMW 5 December 1st 04 07:53 PM
Monroe Ride-Leveler shocks for E30 touring Pedro BMW 1 November 24th 04 12:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AutoBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.