134a Refrigerant

"L.W. (=DFill) Hughes III" > wrote in message =
...
> You really think you may substitute "equal" for "is" in my
> statement "volume change is their new
> density"??????????????????????????? That does not make volume equal
> density, no more than an apple equals and orange. Dense!

But according to Nathan, you just defined delta volume
as density! Density is mass per unit volume, btw...
__
Steve
..

Republicans have Real jobs, that produce products, and pay the
taxes, while the free loading bleeding heart liberals suck make it up
with their false theories.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
http://www.billhughes.com/

Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> I believe that I told you what I think the definitions are...
> don't you think that I knew this before I googled them?
> Why else would I say that you don't have a clue as to
> the proper chemistry definition of a mixture or a compound?
> At least now you know... that is, if you'll believe some Liberal
> Academic sources... I wonder where the Republicon Non-
> Academic sources are?
> __
> Steve
> .

"Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message
...
>> yeah no ****! refrigerant is a compound, a MIXTURE and when you add up
>> all
>> the components they are heavier than the individual components.

> Two big mistakes... mistaking compound for mixture

WRONG. i clearly defined it as a compound as shown above. "mixture" was an
elaboration to put it into terms you could hopefully understand.


> saying that the mixture weighs more than the individual
> components. I almost ****ed myself, laughing!

only because youre to ****ing stupid to comprehend plain english. i was
stating that it was even harder for refrigerant to rise above air because it
was heavier than its individual components. of course, youre so pitifully
desperate that its understandable you would grasp in such a manner.

......that and that youre dirt stupid. :-)

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com

"Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message
...

"Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message
...
> "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message
> m...
> > Hey, if you can put your head completely in the
> > sand, I can propose reasonable thought-experiments!
>
> TRANSLATION --> "im a liar"

> Indeed you are!

not only are you a liar and stupid, but now youre just plain pathetic.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com

What???????????? Volume or Density are variables and are defined by
whatever the formula gives it's value. Simple Algebraic equations
http://members.aol.com/profchm/algebra.html and
http://kr.cs.ait.ac.th/~radok/math/mat6/calcul10.htm You are as dense as
Jeff!!!!!!! You'll never pull your own weight!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
http://www.billhughes.com/

Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> But according to Nathan, you just defined delta volume
> as density! Density is mass per unit volume, btw...
> __
> Steve
> .

I was thinking Mass was where Catholics went on Sunday mornings but I
promised to try to do better when off-topic so I won't say that.



"Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message
...

"L.W. (ßill) Hughes III" > wrote in message
...
> You really think you may substitute "equal" for "is" in my
> statement "volume change is their new
> density"??????????????????????????? That does not make volume equal
> density, no more than an apple equals and orange. Dense!

But according to Nathan, you just defined delta volume
as density! Density is mass per unit volume, btw...
__
Steve
..

Ditto.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
http://www.billhughes.com/

"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> not only are you a liar and stupid, but now youre just plain pathetic.
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com

"Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message
news
"Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message
...
> "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message
> ...
> >I find all kinds of references to it otherwise... I claim
> >popular use.
>
> .....what a dumbass. you cannot change an entire industry because it
> fits
> your argument. liar.

> Show the lie... or FOAD.

TRANSLATION --> "the truth hurts"

you are a liar stephen.



> You don't have a clue about your limitations

TRANSLATION --> "im to insecure to admit to mine"

lol...i know stephen. youre such big liar youve even convinced yourself.
:-)

> because its irrelevant dumb ass. the criteria was subzero temps otherwise
> you would have no excuse not to change the HMC.

No, the criteria was replacement of the HMC on a rooftop

LIAR! once again your lies will not cut it! i CLEARLY stated the ambient
was -14 otherwise there would be no reason not to replace the HMC.


> You're *really* grasping at straws now... trying to weasel
> in another condition! I must be right!

what a filthy little LIAR you are! trying to "weasel in a condition"? see
where i CLEARLY said a -30 degree
day.

liar.



> >ohh.... calling me a liar some more! **** up a rope.

TRANSLATION --> "the truth hurts"

.....im sure it does, liar.

> mistaken? dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=freon
> defines it as:
>
> "A trademark used for a variety of nonflammable gaseous or liquid
> fluorinated hydrocarbons employed primarily as working fluids in
> refrigeration and air conditioning and as aerosol propellants."
>
> it is a trademark used. it is not a compound, a mixture, or anything
> else.
> im right, youre wrong, now spin and lie like a good liberal.
>
> liar.

> Keep squirming... it's fun to watch!

TRANSLATION --> "youre right, i have no response"

suck it up buttercup. :-) freon is a brand name. :-)

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com

Sure. I think you should go back to seventh grade science, and
Algebra.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
http://www.billhughes.com/

Stephen Cowell wrote:
> Recall the beforeposts:
> Bill:
> Me:
> >Bill's new science... volume = density!
> >That's even better than Pi = 3... and
> >explains the supposed 'weightiness' of
> >his scientific posts. Taken by volume,
> >they *are* impressive!
>
> I merely compared it to Pi = 3... I never
> asserted that you asserted that Pi = 3.
> How's that for complex?
> __
> Steve
> .

An excellent example of "praeteritio", for the grammarians amongs us :-)

Dave Milne, Scotland

"Billy Ray" > wrote in message
...
> I was thinking Mass was where Catholics went on Sunday mornings but I
> promised to try to do better when off-topic so I won't say that.