134a Refrigerant

"Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message =
...
> "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message=20
> ...
> > Grammer is how we communicate
>=20
> TRANSLATION --> "my argument is losing so ill attack grammar"
>=20
> :-) doesnt work bottom-boy, spin away from your losing all you want, =
we=20
> wont be diverted.

Yes, your 'ill' attack is not effective... another smelly little fish.
Double negative... elementary school stuff, Nate.
=20
> >> that wasnt my post to you.....that was my post to jeff. my post to =
YOU
> >> clearly stated -30 degrees.
>=20
> > Spinning.... spinning.
>=20
> i know thats what youre trying to do but i wont let you. :-) my post =
to=20
> YOU clearly stated -30 degrees. :-)

But not as a limiting factor! Only as an elaboration...
and in no case holds for the original challenge, which
I met handily. You are a welch.

> > you try to weasel in a condition where
> > the ambient is low.
>=20
> LIAR! i CLEARLY stated -30 degrees to YOU well before you even knew =
what an=20
> HMC was.

Clearly with a 'such as' limiting case... not the
challenge definition. Why do you spin so?
Because without your self-imposed low
ambient spec, I win! Therefore, I win!
Again!
=20
>>Here's a lie for you... someone once suggested to
>>me that he'd change his views on ozone depletion
>>when presented with convincing evidence of the
>>cause-and-effect due to CFC usage... after presenting
>>reams of high-quality evidence, the person did
>>not change their views... indeed, he proceeded
>>to pontificate his own version of atmospheric
>>science garnered from a leak detector user
>>manual. I'd call such a person a damn liar, wouldn't
>>you?
>=20
> this is a given with each statement you make.

?? Whatever... I don't have to call you a liar,
since you've already demonstrated you're a=20
welch.

And lest we forget, the millstone around your
neck:

<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and=20
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us =
with=20
> bull**** in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.

me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>

You deserve what you get... remember that.
__
Steve
..