If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Taxing Drivers By The Mile
http://tinyurl.com/6kuzj
States Mull Taxing Drivers By Mile CORVALLIS, Ore., Feb. 14, 2005 (CBS) College student Jayson Just commutes an odometer-spinning 2,000 miles a month. As CBS News Correspondent Sandra Hughes reports, his monthly gas bill once topped his car payment. "I was paying about $500 a month," says Just. So Just bought a fuel efficient hybrid and said goodbye to his gas-guzzling BMW. And what kind of mileage does he get? "The EPA estimate is 60 in the city, 51 on the highway," says Just. And that saves him almost $300 a month in gas. It's great for Just but bad for the roads he's driving on, because he also pays a lot less in gasoline taxes which fund highway projects and road repairs. As more and more hybrids hit the road, cash-strapped states are warning of rough roads ahead. Officials in car-clogged California are so worried they may be considering a replacement for the gas tax altogether, replacing it with something called "tax by the mile." Seeing tax dollars dwindling, neighboring Oregon has already started road testing the idea. "Drivers will get charged for how many miles they use the roads, and it's as simple as that," says engineer David Kim. Kim and fellow researcher David Porter at Oregon State University equipped a test car with a global positioning device to keep track of its mileage. Eventually, every car would need one. "So, if you drive 10 miles you will pay a certain fee which will be, let's say, one tenth of what someone pays if they drive 100 miles," says Kim. The new tax would be charged each time you fill up. A computer inside the gas pump would communicate with your car's odometer to calculate how much you owe. The system could also track how often you drive during rush hour and charge higher fees to discourage peak use. That's an idea that could break the bottle neck on California's freeways. "We're getting a lot of interest from other states," says Jim Whitty of the Oregon Department of Transportation. "They're watching what we're doing. "Transportation officials across the country are concerned about what's going to happen with the gas tax revenues." Privacy advocates say it's more like big brother riding on your bumper, not to mention a disincentive to buy fuel efficient cars. "It's not fair for people like me who have to commute, and we don't have any choice but take the freeways," says Just. "We shouldn't have to be taxed." But tax-by-mile advocates say it may be the only way to ensure that fuel efficiency doesn't prevent smooth sailing down the road. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
You know what they need to do?
Regulate SUV's as commercial vehicles. A lot of our problems would be solved then. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Ed Stasiak" > wrote in message oups.com...
> http://tinyurl.com/6kuzj > But tax-by-mile advocates say it may be > the only way to ensure that fuel efficiency > doesn't prevent smooth sailing down the road. Wow, so now fuel efficiency is a bad thing? Leave it to government to find a way of accomplishing that. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Random Waftings Of Bunker Blasts wrote:
> You know what they need to do? > > Regulate SUV's as commercial vehicles. > > A lot of our problems would be solved then. Oh I definately agree! Tax SUV owners, who currently register it as a "truck" when its clearly not. I got another proposal: Tax by the EPA's MPG estimates. People who get below 20 MPG on the highway or 10 MPG in the city should pay more, and so forth. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Ed Stasiak" > wrote in message oups.com... > http://tinyurl.com/6kuzj > States Mull Taxing Drivers By Mile > CORVALLIS, Ore., Feb. 14, 2005 > > (CBS) College student Jayson Just commutes an > odometer-spinning 2,000 miles a month. As CBS > News Correspondent Sandra Hughes reports, his > monthly gas bill once topped his car payment. > > "I was paying about $500 a month," says Just. > > So Just bought a fuel efficient hybrid and > said goodbye to his gas-guzzling BMW. > > And what kind of mileage does he get? > > "The EPA estimate is 60 in the city, 51 on > the highway," says Just. > > And that saves him almost $300 a month in gas. > It's great for Just but bad for the roads he's > driving on, because he also pays a lot less > in gasoline taxes which fund highway projects > and road repairs. As more and more hybrids > hit the road, cash-strapped states are warning > of rough roads ahead. > > Officials in car-clogged California are so > worried they may be considering a replacement > for the gas tax altogether, replacing it with > something called "tax by the mile." > > Seeing tax dollars dwindling, neighboring > Oregon has already started road testing the > idea. > > "Drivers will get charged for how many miles > they use the roads, and it's as simple as > that," says engineer David Kim. > > Kim and fellow researcher David Porter at > Oregon State University equipped a test car > with a global positioning device to keep > track of its mileage. Eventually, every car > would need one. > > "So, if you drive 10 miles you will pay a > certain fee which will be, let's say, one > tenth of what someone pays if they drive > 100 miles," says Kim. > > The new tax would be charged each time > you fill up. A computer inside the gas > pump would communicate with your car's > odometer to calculate how much you owe. > > The system could also track how often you > drive during rush hour and charge higher > fees to discourage peak use. That's an > idea that could break the bottle neck on > California's freeways. > > "We're getting a lot of interest from > other states," says Jim Whitty of the > Oregon Department of Transportation. > "They're watching what we're doing. > > "Transportation officials across the > country are concerned about what's going > to happen with the gas tax revenues." > > Privacy advocates say it's more like big > brother riding on your bumper, not to > mention a disincentive to buy fuel efficient > cars. > > "It's not fair for people like me who have > to commute, and we don't have any choice > but take the freeways," says Just. "We > shouldn't have to be taxed." > > But tax-by-mile advocates say it may be > the only way to ensure that fuel efficiency > doesn't prevent smooth sailing down the road. > So fuel efficiency is now a BAD THING? I guess these morons haven't heard about global warming and Peak Oil, have they? This has got to be one of the worst ideas I've ever heard of. Forget the privacy issues for a moment (impossible, but try). This is going to lead to a tremendous increase in the number of unemployed, under-employed and HOMELESS people in this country. Many people are now commuting more than an hour (each way) from where they live to where they work. The reason is simple . . . they can't afford to live where they work, and they can't afford to WORK where they live. A long commute allows many people in this country to ummmmm, LIVE. Now add the mileage tax and suddenly lots of well-employed people are forced to quit their good jobs to work close to home. Only problem is, they can't earn enough money working at wally world to pay the rent and/or mortgage. Ooooops, there goes the house. Awwww, a cardboard box is much more comfortable anyway. -Dave |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Sherman Cahal wrote: > Random Waftings Of Bunker Blasts wrote: > > You know what they need to do? > > > > Regulate SUV's as commercial vehicles. > > > > A lot of our problems would be solved then. > > Oh I definately agree! Tax SUV owners, who currently register it as a > "truck" when its clearly not. I got another proposal: Tax by the EPA's > MPG estimates. People who get below 20 MPG on the highway or 10 MPG in > the city should pay more, and so forth. Just raise the gas tax. It's the fairest method, still encourages conservation (perhaps more so than at present) and doesn't introduce any more bureaucracy into our already over-bureaucratized government. Of course, it's a) politically unpopular and b) makes sense, so that idea is at a disadvantage to other, more complicated and wasteful solutions. nate |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
In article . com>,
Sherman Cahal > wrote: >Oh I definately agree! Tax SUV owners, who currently register it as a >"truck" when its clearly not. I got another proposal: Tax by the EPA's >MPG estimates. People who get below 20 MPG on the highway or 10 MPG in >the city should pay more, and so forth. Why not just raise the gas tax? It would penalize drivers who either a) drive a lot of miles; or b) get poor mileage. I'm not enthusiastic about paying more to the government, but if they're determined to squeeze more out of us, wouldn't it be a lot simpler to raise the gas tax than install gadgets in every car and every gas pump (and create a whole new infrastructure and bureaucracy to support them)? I see a *lot* of questions about a system like what's being discussed, and I just don't see the advantages to be gained (other than the politicians being able to say "we didn't raise the tax, we just added a fee" -- bull!). Gary |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
What idiots. They could try raising the gas tax instead. Not
politically the easiest thing to do, but then neither is strapping on a Big Brother to every single car in the state. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
As others said, increase fuel tax.
a) Doesn't involvement a bunch of privacy invading gizmos, thus much cheaper to implement. b) Encourages cars with improved fuel economy because the increase won't hurt as much as those driving gas guzzlers. Look in Europe for example. Fuel taxes are through the roof so everyone drives more fuel efficient cars. "Ed Stasiak" > wrote in message oups.com... > http://tinyurl.com/6kuzj > But tax-by-mile advocates say it may be > the only way to ensure that fuel efficiency > doesn't prevent smooth sailing down the road. The tax-by-mile advocates must also be privacy invading advocates if they actually believe that. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Ed Stasiak" > wrote in message oups.com... > http://tinyurl.com/6kuzj > States Mull Taxing Drivers By Mile > CORVALLIS, Ore., Feb. 14, 2005 > (snip) Well, if they are stupid enough to try to implement this totally unenforcable plan, I see a lot of cheap SOBs like me either stocking up on old grandfathered clunkers, or buying a lot of gas in cans, or simply finding and disabling the transponder. It would cost a fortune to make the things anywhere near unhackable. The only way to do it with off-the-shelf tech would basically be an e-pass box attached to the car computer, answering whenever it was polled. If you aren't a techie and want a new car, just have one car (maybe shared by neighbors) that never goes further than to corner gas station, and siphon the gas out of it into the road car. I ain't gonna lose any sleep over it. aem sends... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flashpoint Racing Series begins tonight! | [email protected] | Simulators | 34 | February 18th 05 01:37 AM |
This explains some of the bad drivers | Cashew | Driving | 0 | February 11th 05 10:50 PM |
Wed Night N2003 league looking for drivers | [email protected] | Simulators | 0 | November 30th 04 02:46 AM |
Truck Drivers Needed | Trucking Recruiter | 4x4 | 0 | April 14th 04 01:33 PM |