A Cars forum. AutoBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AutoBanter forum » Auto makers » Chrysler
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Chrysler 300 vs. Dodge Magnum?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old January 26th 05, 11:20 PM
Bill Putney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dori A Schmetterling wrote:
> Would it help if I took it out?



That's what *she* said. 8^)

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
adddress with the letter 'x')
Ads
  #32  
Old January 27th 05, 11:04 AM
Dori A Schmetterling
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

LoL

DAS

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

"Bill Putney" > wrote in message
...
> Dori A Schmetterling wrote:
>> Would it help if I took it out?

>
>
> That's what *she* said. 8^)
>
> Bill Putney
> (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
> adddress with the letter 'x')



  #33  
Old January 27th 05, 02:43 PM
news
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

my biggest problem with the 300 vs the magnum is the front end on the magnum
looks like crap compared to the 300. Why can't we have the 300 front on our
station wagons? chrysler sells it that way in europe.
http://www.clevelandjewishnews.com/a...europe1010.txt


  #34  
Old January 27th 05, 03:21 PM
Art
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Many were thinking the opposite. Put the Dodge grill on the Chrysler.


"news" > wrote in message
...
> my biggest problem with the 300 vs the magnum is the front end on the
> magnum looks like crap compared to the 300. Why can't we have the 300
> front on our station wagons? chrysler sells it that way in europe.
> http://www.clevelandjewishnews.com/a...europe1010.txt
>



  #35  
Old January 27th 05, 04:19 PM
Dori A Schmetterling
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Good summary altogther, I thought. Even in diesel-unfriendly Britain, the
share of new diesel sales is rising rapidly.

DAS

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

"news" > wrote in message
...

> http://www.clevelandjewishnews.com/a...europe1010.txt
>




  #36  
Old January 27th 05, 04:33 PM
Steve
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Looks the same, attribution still works.

The ones that were odd are where there's a block of text that starts out

"DAS: ..."



Dori A Schmetterling wrote:

> Test 2 of 2: Double dash manually removed. Does this look different from
> Test 1?
>
> DAS
>
> For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
> ---
>
> "Steve" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Well, whatever you did differently WORKED. This message (quoted below)
>>shows up with proper attribution when I hit "reply" (Mozilla 1.6, by the
>>way).
>>
>>
>>
>>Dori A Schmetterling wrote:
>>
>>
>>>That is odd. The body of the message is usually above the signature,
>>>unless I intersperse my comments ('bottom-post') with the previous
>>>poster's.
>>>
>>>Here I manually removed the double dash. I just checked. It looks like
>>>it's put in automatically.
>>>
>>>DAS
>>>
>>>For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
>>>---
>>>
>>>"Percival P. Cassidy" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Either remove the "-- " (may be added automatically by your newsreader
>>>>software if you specify a signature to be used automatically) or put the
>>>>body of your message above the sig.
>>>>
>>>>Perce
>>>>
>>>
>>>[...]
>>>

>
>

  #37  
Old January 27th 05, 04:34 PM
Steve
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dori A Schmetterling wrote:

> Test 1 of 2: double dash not removed.
>
> DAS



Now THIS one has all the other attribution deleted... so deleting the
double dash did the trick.

  #38  
Old January 27th 05, 04:35 PM
Steve
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Art wrote:

> Many were thinking the opposite. Put the Dodge grill on the Chrysler.
>



I think they got it right. The "formal" front end belongs on a Chrysler,
the "aggressive" front-end belongs on a Dodge.

  #39  
Old January 27th 05, 04:40 PM
Steve
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Modern passenger cars and light-truck diesels are a far cry from the
disasters of the 70s and 80s. Clean, powerful, and easy to live with.
Even the heavy-truck based Cummins we get in the full-sized Rams over
here is now almost as quiet as a gasoline engine, much more efficient,
and doesn't smoke even on our higher-sulfur diesel fuel.



Dori A Schmetterling wrote:

> Good summary altogther, I thought. Even in diesel-unfriendly Britain, the
> share of new diesel sales is rising rapidly.
>
> DAS
>
> For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
> ---
>
> "news" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>
>>http://www.clevelandjewishnews.com/a...europe1010.txt
>>

>
>
>
>

  #40  
Old January 28th 05, 12:28 PM
Dori A Schmetterling
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks. Shall try to remove double dash manually for all you Mozilla fans.

DAS

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

"Steve" > wrote in message
...
> Dori A Schmetterling wrote:
>
>> Test 1 of 2: double dash not removed.
>>
>> DAS

>
>
> Now THIS one has all the other attribution deleted... so deleting the
> double dash did the trick.
>



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 Dr. David Zatz Chrysler 10 January 2nd 05 05:15 AM
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 Dr. David Zatz Chrysler 10 December 18th 04 05:15 AM
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 Dr. David Zatz Chrysler 10 November 1st 04 05:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AutoBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.