If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#221
|
|||
|
|||
"Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message = ... > "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message=20 > ... > >> lol......now THERES something conclusive. <rolling eyes> >=20 > > They're not! >=20 > EXACTLY! your links are not conclusive. :-) Nothing would be, to you... dropout. =20 > > > > from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the = bottom > > > > under > > > > electronic leak detectors: > > > > "Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore > > > > refrigerants > > > > will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak > > > > detecting > > > > on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more = effective > > > > in > > > > detecting a leak and will save you time." >=20 > > "will be more effective "... that's not conclusive! >=20 > but the "Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore=20 > refrigerants will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures." = certainly is!=20 Outdoors? > > Your HVAC training links are not worthy of consideration... >=20 > TRANSLATION --> "i have no response because they clearly prove what = youve=20 > been saying" Pitiful! 'translation'... just how *much* HS did you=20 actually make it through? __ Steve .. |
Ads |
#222
|
|||
|
|||
Question: At this stage, do you two think you can convince the other ?
Dave Milne, Scotland '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message ... "Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message ... > "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message > ... > >> lol......now THERES something conclusive. <rolling eyes> > > > They're not! > > EXACTLY! your links are not conclusive. :-) Nothing would be, to you... dropout. > > > > from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom > > > > under > > > > electronic leak detectors: > > > > "Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore > > > > refrigerants > > > > will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak > > > > detecting > > > > on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective > > > > in > > > > detecting a leak and will save you time." > > > "will be more effective "... that's not conclusive! > > but the "Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore > refrigerants will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures." certainly is! Outdoors? > > Your HVAC training links are not worthy of consideration... > > TRANSLATION --> "i have no response because they clearly prove what youve > been saying" Pitiful! 'translation'... just how *much* HS did you actually make it through? __ Steve .. |
#223
|
|||
|
|||
Howard Dean, head of the Democratic party, doesn't seem so strange
anymore. God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O http://www.billhughes.com/ Dave Milne wrote: > > Question: At this stage, do you two think you can convince the other ? > > Dave Milne, Scotland > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ |
#224
|
|||
|
|||
"Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message
... > What an incredible lack of scientific acumen... spin all you wish, i proved you wrong and its obvious that it burns. :-) > They're not lining up to > support you heh....its been such easy work that "support" simply isnt required. > my personal email from this > little flamefest is going %100 my way. BUWHAHAHA! the old "my email" ploy. i _knew_ it was only a matter of time before you resorted that that one. :-) > Seriously, using a leak-checker manual to debate > the NOAA. the NOAA statement is nothing more than "could be's". my link, written by the very engineers you seem to worship, clearly states that refrigerant falls due to its weight with no room for doubt. you can pout, cry, whine, or attempt to spin off the issue as many times as you like but the statement is absolute and conclusive. here ya go. :-) from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under electronic leak detectors: "Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in detecting a leak and will save you time." from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic leak detector that i personally use): "Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend to fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way of finding such." :-) -- Nathan W. Collier http://7SlotGrille.com http://UtilityOffRoad.com |
#225
|
|||
|
|||
"Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message
... >> but the "Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore >> refrigerants will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures." certainly >> is! >Outdoors? that statement is absolute. atomic weight does not change being in or out of doors. nice try, liberal. :-) -- Nathan W. Collier http://7SlotGrille.com http://UtilityOffRoad.com |
#226
|
|||
|
|||
"L.W. ("ßill") Hughes III" > wrote in message
... > Howard Dean, head of the Democratic party, doesn't seem so strange > anymore. lol aint it the truth! -- Nathan W. Collier http://7SlotGrille.com http://UtilityOffRoad.com |
#227
|
|||
|
|||
"Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message = ... > "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message=20 > ... > > What an incredible lack of scientific acumen... >=20 > spin all you wish, i proved you wrong and its obvious that it burns. = :-) You still want to play 'Scientist and Dumbass'... OK.. > > They're not lining up to > > support you >=20 > heh....its been such easy work that "support" simply isnt required. You don't know what mental work is... remember dropping out? > > my personal email from this > > little flamefest is going %100 my way. >=20 > BUWHAHAHA! the old "my email" ploy. i _knew_ it was only a matter of = time=20 > before you resorted that that one. :-) Well? > > Seriously, using a leak-checker manual to debate > > the NOAA. >=20 > the NOAA statement is nothing more than "could be's". my link, = written by=20 > the very engineers you seem to worship, clearly states that = refrigerant=20 > falls due to its weight with no room for doubt. you can pout, cry, = whine,=20 > or attempt to spin off the issue as many times as you like but the = statement=20 > is absolute and conclusive. here ya go. :-) http://www.al.noaa.gov/WWWHD/pubdocs/StratO3.html <> In the stratosphere, the region of the atmosphere between about 10 and = 50 kilometers (6-30 miles) above the Earth's surface, ozone (O3) plays a = vital role by absorbing harmful ultraviolet radiation from the sun. = Stratospheric ozone is threatened by some of the human-made gases that have been = released into the atmosphere, including those known as chlorofluorocarbons = (CFCs). Once widely used as propellants in spray cans, refrigerants, electronics cleaning agents, and in foam and insulating products, the CFCs had been hailed as the "wonder chemicals." But the very properties that make them useful - chemical inertness, non-toxicity, insolubility in water - also = make them resistant to removal in the lower atmosphere. CFCs are mixed worldwide by the large-scale motions of the atmosphere = and survive until, after 1-2 years, they reach the stratosphere and are = broken down by ultraviolet radiation. The chlorine atoms within them are = released and directly attack ozone. In the process of destroying ozone, the = chlorine atoms are regenerated and begin to attack other ozone molecules... and = so on, for thousands of cycles before the chlorine atoms are removed from = the stratosphere by other processes. </> When will you respond to this link I've posted thrice now? =20 __ Steve playing 'Scientist and Dumbass'.... guess who stars as Dumbass... .. |
#228
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Milne" > wrote in message = . uk... > Question: At this stage, do you two think you can convince the other ? >=20 > Dave Milne, Scotland > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ Question: Who do *you* believe, Dave? Remember the trade winds? Obviously, there's no convincing going on... but I'm having fun wiping up the floor. As long as Nate keeps weebling back up, I'm punching... __ Steve |
#229
|
|||
|
|||
"Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message = ... > "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message=20 > ... > >> but the "Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, = therefore > >> refrigerants will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures." = certainly=20 > >> is! >=20 > >Outdoors? >=20 > that statement is absolute. atomic weight does not change being in or = out=20 > of doors. >=20 > nice try, liberal. :-) So, your answer is, hold the probe directly under the leak, even in the wind? Why not downwind, human? __ Steve : ) .. |
#230
|
|||
|
|||
"L.W. (=DFill) Hughes III" > wrote in message = ... > Howard Dean, head of the Democratic party, doesn't seem so strange > anymore.=20 Is he stranger than Jeff Gannon? : ) __ Steve .. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Conditioning (A/C) Trouble | [email protected] | Chrysler | 5 | June 2nd 05 04:24 AM |
Maxi-Frig for R12/R134A ? | Henry Kolesnik | Technology | 39 | May 26th 05 06:31 AM |
Disposal of Refrigerant 12 dichlorodifluoromethane? | Wayne Pein | Technology | 4 | April 13th 05 11:26 PM |
Climatronic Diagnostic Controls | Luís Lourenço | Audi | 1 | November 12th 04 08:22 AM |