A Cars forum. AutoBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AutoBanter forum » Auto makers » Chrysler
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

PT CRUISER THE WAY TO GO



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old December 14th 04, 10:27 PM
L
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


On 14-Dec-2004, "SRG" > wrote:

> Well, I've seen it in mine, at least one other club member, and its listed
>
> as one of the top 10 problems on PTDIY. I've also read numerous posts
> about it on different PT forums. As I said, "it seems to be cropping up
> more and more", probably because PTs are getting older.
>
> SRG


I just mentioned it in reply to another message in this thread. On my 2001
(delivered in 2000) the control started smoking and had to be replaced).
The problem occurred about a year ago.
Ads
  #22  
Old December 15th 04, 02:01 AM
Punch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Richard" > wrote in message
...
> Three big negatives with mine.
>
> Too slow (for me) with automatic.


240 hp with turbo high output and mopar stage 1 in automatic


> Poor fuel economy (18 to 20 over three years).


yep it sucks!!!


> Very very wide turning circle with automatic.


never noticed, but you could practice 3 point turns, or emergency brake
turns : )


  #23  
Old December 15th 04, 02:01 AM
Punch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Richard" > wrote in message
...
> Three big negatives with mine.
>
> Too slow (for me) with automatic.


240 hp with turbo high output and mopar stage 1 in automatic


> Poor fuel economy (18 to 20 over three years).


yep it sucks!!!


> Very very wide turning circle with automatic.


never noticed, but you could practice 3 point turns, or emergency brake
turns : )


  #24  
Old December 15th 04, 02:02 AM
Punch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"SRG" > wrote in message
m...
> Another problem that seems to be cropping up more and mo The
> multi-function switch, which controls the lights, fog lights, high-beams,
> dome (interior)lights and turn signals, fails and works erratically.


I belong to various pt groups and haven't come across this one yet,
hopefully that's a bug that's been ironed out of newer models.


  #25  
Old December 15th 04, 02:02 AM
Punch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"SRG" > wrote in message
m...
> Another problem that seems to be cropping up more and mo The
> multi-function switch, which controls the lights, fog lights, high-beams,
> dome (interior)lights and turn signals, fails and works erratically.


I belong to various pt groups and haven't come across this one yet,
hopefully that's a bug that's been ironed out of newer models.


  #26  
Old December 15th 04, 03:11 AM
do not spam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Richard wrote:
> Three big negatives with mine.
>
> Too slow (for me) with automatic.
> Poor fuel economy (18 to 20 over three years).
> Very very wide turning circle with automatic.
>
> Other than that it has been a great experience.
>
> Richard.
>
>

I have an 01 6 speed manual. It too has a wide turn radius. Why would
the automatic have a wider one?

Jerry
  #27  
Old December 15th 04, 03:11 AM
do not spam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Richard wrote:
> Three big negatives with mine.
>
> Too slow (for me) with automatic.
> Poor fuel economy (18 to 20 over three years).
> Very very wide turning circle with automatic.
>
> Other than that it has been a great experience.
>
> Richard.
>
>

I have an 01 6 speed manual. It too has a wide turn radius. Why would
the automatic have a wider one?

Jerry
  #28  
Old December 15th 04, 06:59 AM
Punch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"do not spam" <"do not > wrote in message
news:nWNvd.13299$1%.7080@fed1read03...
>
> Richard wrote:
>> Three big negatives with mine.
>>
>> Too slow (for me) with automatic.
>> Poor fuel economy (18 to 20 over three years).
>> Very very wide turning circle with automatic.
>>
>> Other than that it has been a great experience.
>>
>> Richard.

> I have an 01 6 speed manual. It too has a wide turn radius. Why would
> the automatic have a wider one?
>
> Jerry


not sure, but it does have wider, I believe the tranny casing is bigger,
thus not allowing the steering "linkages...." to turn as much as the
standard car.


  #29  
Old December 15th 04, 06:59 AM
Punch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"do not spam" <"do not > wrote in message
news:nWNvd.13299$1%.7080@fed1read03...
>
> Richard wrote:
>> Three big negatives with mine.
>>
>> Too slow (for me) with automatic.
>> Poor fuel economy (18 to 20 over three years).
>> Very very wide turning circle with automatic.
>>
>> Other than that it has been a great experience.
>>
>> Richard.

> I have an 01 6 speed manual. It too has a wide turn radius. Why would
> the automatic have a wider one?
>
> Jerry


not sure, but it does have wider, I believe the tranny casing is bigger,
thus not allowing the steering "linkages...." to turn as much as the
standard car.


  #30  
Old December 15th 04, 03:52 PM
Dan Gates
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Matt Whiting wrote:
> SRG wrote:
>
>> Another problem that seems to be cropping up more and mo The
>> multi-function switch, which controls the lights, fog lights,
>> high-beams, dome (interior)lights and turn signals, fails and works
>> erratically.

>
>
> This isn't unique to the PT. I've replaced the one on my 96 GV as well
> as my 94 Chevy K1500.
>
>
> Matt
>


I have never seen a good multi-function switch. They all have problems
because of all of the functions, and therefore connections and switches,
required in such a small space.

I have replaced them on Toyota Tercels, Dodge Neons, a Ford Taurus and
a Ford Escort GT.

Put the damned switches on the dash and reach, once in a while, it might
be good exercise! |>)

Dan


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Don't compare the PT Cruiser to a Gremlin Bill Putney Antique cars 14 May 18th 04 05:31 PM
'95 Toyota Land Cruiser No Start Hewie 4x4 4 April 11th 04 09:06 PM
Land Cruiser 80/Lexus LX450 Differential Question Rhett 4x4 8 April 5th 04 03:03 AM
83 CJ vs. 75 Land Cruiser Muuurgh 4x4 10 January 11th 04 12:57 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AutoBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.