If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
LFS : Check out the website
Looks they made a nice deal with an interesting company....
http://www.liveforspeed.net/wtf.html and http://www.liveforspeed.net/countdown/ Now we can only hope for other models... Greetz, Jimster |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
LFS : Check out the website
Jimster wrote:
> Looks they made a nice deal with an interesting company.... > > http://www.liveforspeed.net/wtf.html > > and http://www.liveforspeed.net/countdown/ > > Now we can only hope for other models... Slightly old news here I can't get excited about another crack at simulating modern F1. The real deal with F1 is the brutal forces on the driver, dealing with the acceleration on the body, incredible braking forces allied to neck wrenching cornering forces. During all this the driver has to operate the controls and make the split second decisions and race other drivers. To facilitate all that going on computer assists help the driver operate the gears (just flick a paddle) and manage the wheelspin via traction control. Strip out the forces on the driver and it just seems like a sped up game of reactions, hit the brake markers press a button the prerequisite number of times to get down the right gear turn, bury the throttle and let the traction control do its things and keep up with the gear changes until the next corner. All very frenetic but not quite a true simulation. Try doing it the real thing and the forces will be trying to pull your feet away from the pedals and you will fighting to keep your head in the right place let alone steer precisely. Hence simulated modern F1 has an element of arcade feel because so much is lost in the simulation. Whereas the lower or older formulas have other challenges that can be simulated. Throttle control, more pronounced sliding, gear changing, fading brakes and so on rather than computers simulating computers. Of course F1 includes a hefty strategy element if that is your thing, but for me the lower formulas offers more for simulating the experience than F1 can without some serious hydraulics... Cheers Tony |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
LFS : Check out the website
jeez..what a killbuzz...
"Tony Rickard" > wrote in message . uk... > Jimster wrote: >> Looks they made a nice deal with an interesting company.... >> >> http://www.liveforspeed.net/wtf.html >> >> and http://www.liveforspeed.net/countdown/ >> >> Now we can only hope for other models... > > Slightly old news here > > I can't get excited about another crack at simulating modern F1. The real > deal with F1 is the brutal forces on the driver, dealing with the > acceleration on the body, incredible braking forces allied to neck > wrenching cornering forces. During all this the driver has to operate the > controls and make the split second decisions and race other drivers. > > To facilitate all that going on computer assists help the driver operate > the gears (just flick a paddle) and manage the wheelspin via traction > control. > > Strip out the forces on the driver and it just seems like a sped up game > of reactions, hit the brake markers press a button the prerequisite number > of times to get down the right gear turn, bury the throttle and let the > traction control do its things and keep up with the gear changes until the > next corner. All very frenetic but not quite a true simulation. > > Try doing it the real thing and the forces will be trying to pull your > feet away from the pedals and you will fighting to keep your head in the > right place let alone steer precisely. > > Hence simulated modern F1 has an element of arcade feel because so much is > lost in the simulation. > > Whereas the lower or older formulas have other challenges that can be > simulated. Throttle control, more pronounced sliding, gear changing, > fading brakes and so on rather than computers simulating computers. Of > course F1 includes a hefty strategy element if that is your thing, but for > me the lower formulas offers more for simulating the experience than F1 > can without some serious hydraulics... > > Cheers > Tony |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
LFS : Check out the website
Tony Rickard > wrote in news:eEd1g.55555
: > Hence simulated modern F1 has an element of arcade feel because so much > is lost in the simulation. > > Whereas the lower or older formulas have other challenges that can be > simulated. Throttle control, more pronounced sliding, gear changing, > fading brakes and so on rather than computers simulating computers. Of > course F1 includes a hefty strategy element if that is your thing, but > for me the lower formulas offers more for simulating the experience than > F1 can without some serious hydraulics... > > Cheers > Tony So you crank your room up to 130 degrees F to simulate driving a Corvette at Le Mans? Must be arcade too eh? dave henrie |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
LFS : Check out the website
Dave Henrie wrote:
> Tony Rickard > wrote in news:eEd1g.55555 > : > >> Hence simulated modern F1 has an element of arcade feel because so much >> is lost in the simulation. >> >> Whereas the lower or older formulas have other challenges that can be >> simulated. Throttle control, more pronounced sliding, gear changing, >> fading brakes and so on rather than computers simulating computers. Of >> course F1 includes a hefty strategy element if that is your thing, but >> for me the lower formulas offers more for simulating the experience than >> F1 can without some serious hydraulics... >> >> Cheers >> Tony > So you crank your room up to 130 degrees F to simulate driving a Corvette > at Le Mans? Must be arcade too eh? Well you could Maybe a bad choice of words, I just feel modern F1 loses more in the translation to a full simulation than many other series, but its positions as the pinnacle of motorsports make it a natural choice. Cheers Tony |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
LFS : Check out the website
Timmy Ferrell wrote:
> jeez..what a killbuzz... I guess for a veteran simmer seeing "wtf" and "holy cow" for another stab at an F1 sim seems a bit much. Of course the fact that LFS is getting a real car and a serious name at that is big news so I should curtail my dampening of enthusiasm Cheers Tony |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
LFS : Check out the website
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
LFS : Check out the website
> However it's interesting to see the LFS team striking a deal of some
> kind with an F1 team. Maybe they managed to sell the "free advertising" > angle and didn't have to cough up any money. Note that Williams BMW F1 team did a deal with Toca Race Driver 3. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Check out the website
"Jimster" > wrote in message ... > Looks they made a nice deal with an interesting company.... > > http://www.liveforspeed.net/wtf.html > > and http://www.liveforspeed.net/countdown/ > > Now we can only hope for other models... > > Greetz, > > Jimster > > > > > ONE of the biggest things I think everyone is missing is also in the update is tyre side wall modelling !! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 | Dr. David Zatz | Chrysler | 6 | December 7th 06 04:55 PM |
2001 Accord maintenance question / concern ... | Leon Kiriliuk | Honda | 24 | April 5th 05 04:01 AM |
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 | Dr. David Zatz | Chrysler | 4 | February 2nd 05 05:22 AM |
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 | Dr. David Zatz | Chrysler | 7 | February 1st 05 01:43 PM |
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 | Dr. David Zatz | Chrysler | 10 | December 2nd 04 05:19 AM |