If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
In other words, YOU RESPONDED TO THE WRONG PERSON. I NEVER SAID ANYTHING
ABOUT GTR. -Larry "Darus" > wrote in message oups.com... > You're right. You're only post was "I think it's forgotten that Each > version of NRx, once patched, had NO > SHOWSTOPPERS. > > > You can't say that about any of the EA Games. > > > -Larry" > > and I still have no idea what you are talking about. Thus my reply from > earlier "HUH?" still applies. So now you have TWO posts that make > absolutely no sense. > |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
And it's not a show-stopper, which is obvious since NR2003 is the most
successful SIM that's been released. -Larry "jason moyer" > wrote in message oups.com... > Larry wrote: >> I think it's forgotten that Each version of NRx, once patched, had NO >> SHOWSTOPPERS. > > I dunno if you'd consider them showstoppers, but the physics bugs in > n2003 that survived the patch are pretty bad. > > - RF tire temps on road courses > - trick setups on superspeedways > - low drag/grip levels in cup/bgn physics > |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Well, Larry....no as a matter of fact, YOU did. If you take the time to
look at the progression of the thread, it's plain for all to see that "Byron Forbes" and I traded numerous posts with some of the content relating to GTR and his "problems" with it. Example: "Byron Forbes Jul 15, 1:19 pm On my GTR box it is clearly marked - "Distributed by Electronic Arts". It's all the same arseholes......." You replied with: "Larry Jul 15, 4:48 pm I think it's forgotten that Each version of NRx, once patched, had NO SHOWSTOPPERS. You can't say that about any of the EA Games. -Larry" Now, I type out a reply to "Byron Forbes". (Bear in mind that in my hatred of all things Microsoft, I don't use OE to read usenet posts, I use Google Groups. It's a little slow, but since I only read R.A.S., it's not a big deal). My reply: "Darus Jul 15, 5:26 pm I'm not sure where the hate mail for GTR came from, as this WAS a NSR/NR2003 thread, but I have no problem with GTR. What's yours?........" I then check for for new messages and see that your message about "SHOWSTOPPERS" and have no idea what you are talking about. I replied with my succinct post of "HUH?". As the thread moves along, I understand that you are referring to a "showstopper" as a <negative> aspect of either NSR or NRxxxx. I take that term to mean the opposite. Simple misunderstanding. Mssr. Forbes and I then traded 3 three more posts and then state that you never referred to GTR in your post. "I" never said that you did. Hopefully you can see that it was not I that erred by replying to the wrong post. Your post ended up in the middle of an exchange with Forbes and I and you ASSUMED that my reply "I'm not sure where the hate mail for GTR came from..." was intended for you. It was not. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
you're all losers
Darus wrote: > Well, Larry....no as a matter of fact, YOU did. If you take the time to > look at the progression of the thread, it's plain for all to see that > "Byron Forbes" and I traded numerous posts with some of the content > relating to GTR and his "problems" with it. > > Example: "Byron Forbes Jul 15, 1:19 pm > > On my GTR box it is clearly marked - "Distributed by Electronic Arts". > It's all the same arseholes......." > > You replied with: > > "Larry Jul 15, 4:48 pm > > I think it's forgotten that Each version of NRx, once patched, had NO > SHOWSTOPPERS. > > You can't say that about any of the EA Games. > > -Larry" > > Now, I type out a reply to "Byron Forbes". (Bear in mind that in my > hatred of all things Microsoft, I don't use OE to read usenet posts, I > use Google Groups. It's a little slow, but since I only read R.A.S., > it's not a big deal). My reply: > > "Darus Jul 15, 5:26 pm > > I'm not sure where the hate mail for GTR came from, as this WAS a > NSR/NR2003 thread, but I have no problem with GTR. What's > yours?........" > > I then check for for new messages and see that your message about > "SHOWSTOPPERS" and have no idea what you are talking about. I replied > with my succinct post of "HUH?". > > As the thread moves along, I understand that you are referring to a > "showstopper" as a <negative> aspect of either NSR or NRxxxx. I take > that term to mean the opposite. Simple misunderstanding. > > Mssr. Forbes and I then traded 3 three more posts and then state that > you never referred to GTR in your post. "I" never said that you did. > > Hopefully you can see that it was not I that erred by replying to the > wrong post. Your post ended up in the middle of an exchange with Forbes > and I and you ASSUMED that my reply "I'm not sure where the hate mail > for GTR came from..." was intended for you. It was not. > |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Larry wrote:
> And it's not a show-stopper, which is obvious since NR2003 is the most > successful SIM that's been released. In what way is n2003 the most successful? |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
You're a has been NFLer punk!
"reggie white" > wrote in message . .. > you're all losers > |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
I was going to post something along those lines, but since RW is dead,
I held off. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
That rings a bell - what from?
"Darus" > wrote in message oups.com... >I was going to post something along those lines, but since RW is dead, > I held off. > |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hi Guys. First Time Poster | roy958 | Driving | 0 | March 17th 05 11:32 PM |
Found a Sweepstakes to win a HUMMER H2! Limit of one entry perperson. | RaRly | Driving | 5 | March 13th 05 01:53 AM |
Wireless Keyless Entry | Teleplus Gatineau | Ford Explorer | 7 | January 25th 05 03:01 PM |
Part Number Request: 1996 Mustang GT: Keyless Entry Remote | Hucklebuck | Ford Mustang | 5 | January 4th 05 03:15 AM |