If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Preferences, opinions, experiences...
What is everyone's preferences, opinions, and experiences with the '95
Dodge Caravan 3.0, 3.3, and 3.8? What would you pick if nothing else mattered but the engine? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:49:27 -0600, Shades wrote:
> What is everyone's preferences, opinions, and experiences with the '95 > Dodge Caravan 3.0, 3.3, and 3.8? What would you pick if nothing else > mattered but the engine? The 3.3 -- If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space. Linux Registered User #327951 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I've got a 3.0 in my 92...I don't think I'd change anything. Except the
power of the 3.8 would be tempting. :-) The other big thing I like with mine is the 3.0 is paired up with the 3-speed rather than the 4-speed overdrive tranny. From what I gather, that's a better transmission. I bought mine at 84k, and now have 177k on it and have never had the tranny worked on. Had to put a head gasket on the engine at around 162k, but I'm guessing that's probably just par for the course no matter what engine... Wesley "Shades" <shades_1970(at)netins(dot)net> wrote in message ... > What is everyone's preferences, opinions, and experiences with the '95 > Dodge Caravan 3.0, 3.3, and 3.8? What would you pick if nothing else > mattered but the engine? > > |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Can you expand on your answer a bit, please?
"Dan C" > wrote in message news > On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:49:27 -0600, Shades wrote: > >> What is everyone's preferences, opinions, and experiences with the >> '95 >> Dodge Caravan 3.0, 3.3, and 3.8? What would you pick if nothing else >> mattered but the engine? > > The 3.3 > > -- > If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space. > Linux Registered User #327951 > |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:26:55 -0600, Shades wrote:
<stupid top-posting corrected> >>> What is everyone's preferences, opinions, and experiences with the >>> '95 Dodge Caravan 3.0, 3.3, and 3.8? What would you pick if nothing else >>> mattered but the engine? >> The 3.3 > Can you expand on your answer a bit, please? The 3.0 is an underpowered, failure-prone Mitsubishi. The 3.8 offers no real advantage over the 3.3 and sucks gas. -- If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space. Linux Registered User #327951 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Got a 92 GC with a 3.3. Bought it with 86,000 - at that time it burned
about 1 qt every 2000 or so. 177,000 now, burns the same amount with no end in sight. Plenty of pick up. I don't have experience with the 3.8. It's my understanding it's the same engine, basically as the 3.3. I was wondering how many miles a well cared for 3.3 would go? Anyone have 220+k on one of these babies? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
You cant top post for Dan, he will have a coniption fit, and by all means do
a spell check and use proper punuctuation....BUT WHATEVER YOU DO DONT TOP POST "Shades" <shades_1970(at)netins(dot)net> wrote in message ... > Can you expand on your answer a bit, please? > > > > "Dan C" > wrote in message > news > > On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:49:27 -0600, Shades wrote: > > > >> What is everyone's preferences, opinions, and experiences with the > >> '95 > >> Dodge Caravan 3.0, 3.3, and 3.8? What would you pick if nothing else > >> mattered but the engine? > > > > The 3.3 > > > > -- > > If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space. > > Linux Registered User #327951 > > > > |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
What are you talking about?
"maxpower" > wrote in message ... > You cant top post for Dan, he will have a coniption fit, and by all means > do > a spell check and use proper punuctuation....BUT WHATEVER YOU DO DONT TOP > POST > "Shades" <shades_1970(at)netins(dot)net> wrote in message > ... >> Can you expand on your answer a bit, please? >> >> >> >> "Dan C" > wrote in message >> news >> > On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:49:27 -0600, Shades wrote: >> > >> >> What is everyone's preferences, opinions, and experiences with the >> >> '95 >> >> Dodge Caravan 3.0, 3.3, and 3.8? What would you pick if nothing else >> >> mattered but the engine? >> > >> > The 3.3 >> > >> > -- >> > If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space. >> > Linux Registered User #327951 >> > >> >> > > |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Shades" <shades_1970(at)netins(dot)net> wrote in message ... > What are you talking about? > > > > "maxpower" > wrote in message > ... > > You cant top post for Dan, he will have a coniption fit, and by all means > > do > > a spell check and use proper punuctuation....BUT WHATEVER YOU DO DONT TOP > > POST > > "Shades" <shades_1970(at)netins(dot)net> wrote in message > > ... > >> Can you expand on your answer a bit, please? > >> > >> > >> > >> "Dan C" > wrote in message > >> news > >> > On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:49:27 -0600, Shades wrote: > >> > > >> >> What is everyone's preferences, opinions, and experiences with the > >> >> '95 > >> >> Dodge Caravan 3.0, 3.3, and 3.8? What would you pick if nothing else > >> >> mattered but the engine? > >> > > >> > The 3.3 > >> > > >> > -- > >> > If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space. > >> > Linux Registered User #327951 > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > Dan C made a comment to you about posting on the top of the OP and gets mad when you do that, read his comment to you..<stupid top-posting corrected>. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Is this from personal experience? I currently have a '92 3.0/3spd with
220K and neither engine or trans has ever been touched(Borrowed time, I know). I have never had allot of faith in em buy this thing has impressed me. What about the '94-'95 3.0? Had there been improvements by then? "Dan C" > wrote in message news > On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:26:55 -0600, Shades wrote: > > <stupid top-posting corrected> > >>>> What is everyone's preferences, opinions, and experiences with the >>>> '95 Dodge Caravan 3.0, 3.3, and 3.8? What would you pick if nothing >>>> else >>>> mattered but the engine? > >>> The 3.3 > >> Can you expand on your answer a bit, please? > > The 3.0 is an underpowered, failure-prone Mitsubishi. The 3.8 offers no > real advantage over the 3.3 and sucks gas. > > -- > If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space. > Linux Registered User #327951 > |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
looking for welder opinions | bige lewis | Technology | 3 | February 8th 05 02:49 PM |
Opinions on shocks? | Motorhead Lawyer | Jeep | 14 | February 5th 05 03:14 AM |
Opinions on the 2002 L100. | Rob | Saturn | 2 | December 27th 04 04:53 AM |
Experience and opinions on '86 635I | The Singers | BMW | 5 | November 29th 04 11:20 AM |
Opinions of the 1988 735i ---Should I buy one?? | Mark J. Amero | BMW | 7 | November 20th 04 08:47 PM |